1
   

Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath

 
 
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:06 am
AP
Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath

Thu Nov 10, 8:36 PM ET

JERUSALEM - Archaeologists digging at the purported biblical home of Goliath have unearthed a shard of pottery bearing an inscription of the Philistine's name, a find they claimed lends historical credence to the Bible's tale of David's battle with the giant.


While the discovery is not definitive evidence of Goliath's existence, it does support the Bible's depiction of life at the time the battle was supposed to have occurred, said Dr. Aren Maeir, a professor at Bar-Ilan University and director of the excavation.

"What this means is that at the time there were people there named Goliath," he said. "It shows us that David and Goliath's story reflects the cultural reality of the time." In the story, David slew Goliath with a slingshot.

Some scholars assert the story of David slaying the giant Goliath is a myth written down hundreds of years later. Maeir said finding the scraps lends historical credence to the biblical story.

The shard dates back to around 950 B.C., within 70 years of when biblical chronology asserts David squared off against Goliath, making it the oldest Philistine inscription ever found, the archaeologists said.

Scientists made the discovery at Tel es-Safi, a dig site in southern
Israel thought to be to be the location of the Philistine city of Gath.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 645 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:14 am
well know we have scientific evidence that there was a person named goliath. Fascinating.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:18 am
The records of the Roman Empire show that there was once an "Arturus, Dux Bellorum Britannicum"--Arthur, War Duke of Britain. In the two centuries after Arthur was reputed to have lived, the name Arthur is found to frequently have been given to first sons--and families recording births were often the more affluent families in the community--people weren't much interested in serfs, whether they had children, and what those children were named.

None of which supports a contention that the King Arthur as described in Le Mort d'Arthur printed by Caxton in 1485 bears any resemblance to the truth.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Finding Said to Boost Proof of Goliath
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 07:53:16