1
   

Why do people hate God so much? Are they blind?

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 07:55 pm
J_B,

I didn't take it in a negative way at all. I am one of Jesus' flock and am so grateful and thankful that I am. Using the term flock is just like using teacher/student, shepherd/flock, etc.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:18 pm
I just read Small Gods by Terry Pratchett. It's not a serious work on religious philosophy, but thoughtful and thought-provoking all the same. And funny. His storyline points out the difference between god(s) and religion. And why I dislike religion falls into the dichotomy.

I find that when I like to religious books, I find that their tenets (is that the right word) are generally good. But what I see, currently and through history, religion doing sometimes makes me feel physically ill. Seeing people follow with their eyes closed in such blind faith makes me feel both envious and frutrated. Envious because while I'm a terrible follower, I'm also not a good leader. I sort of drift. Frustrated because it seems to me that good people can be persuaded to do bad things for their god.

At least that's the way I see it. I don't really have a beef with any of the gods I've learned about. It's the religions that buildup in a god's name that often irk me.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:19 pm
Well, upon reading up, I see I haven't added anything new (except maybe the book title) to this thread.....
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:29 pm
littlek,

I understand where you are coming from. But, I think it is important to realize that anyone that would fly airplanes into a building to kill innocent people is not doing it for God. They are doing it for their own motives.

God does not demand that we go out and kill for him. Once Christ came the old ways feel away.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:31 pm
Everything that everyone does is done for their own motives.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:34 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
littlek,

I understand where you are coming from. But, I think it is important to realize that anyone that would fly airplanes into a building to kill innocent people is not doing it for God. They are doing it for their own motives.

God does not demand that we go out and kill for him. Once Christ came the old ways feel away.


I agree with you Momma. However.... Those people who do bad things are thinking, in their mind, that they are doing those things in the name of God. Sure, they are irrational and perhaps deluded, but they seem to believe that.

We, as Christians, deplore that and in no way agree with it. It is, however, reality that we cannot ignore.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:39 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Quote:
Did you sleep through the atheistic Communist bloodbaths of the 20th century?


Real life-Are sociopathic atheistic societies proof that a theist society is, by definition, a kinder, gentler, one? There are rotten apples that abound in the entire spectrum of belief. The problem is, that religions have a long history of blood, guts and mayhem in the NAME of their God.

(BTW, did YOU sleep through hIstory class when they taught about the Crusades, or the Inquisition?)


You made a comparative statement that the most heinous acts in history had been committed with a religious motivation.

I disagree. The millions who were enslaved and perished in a few short decades under the boot of atheistic Communism far surpass the thousands that died in the Inquisition or the Crusades.

Even with the history of the European religious strife, any observer would have to conclude that on the whole the traditionally Christian nations of America and Europe have produced much freer societies than any others.

So perhaps by definition theistic societies are not better, but by experience nearly all would recognize that the predominantly Christian ones have been.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:40 pm
Intrepid,

I agree with you totally. It's just hard to understand anyone could think God would condone such behavior.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:42 pm
Momma, I don't understand why god would condone a lot of behavior people say he condones.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:44 pm
J_B wrote:
Let's discuss flocks...

I always had a problem being a follower. Flocks remind me of sheep, sheep remind me of followers, followers remind me of blind trust which scares the hell out of me. Particularly when the blind trust is being spoken by a human who claims to have a direct line to God's intent.

MA, I'm not trying to pick on you here, but when you called yourself one of the Flock, my radar alarms started screaming. It's the concept of flock that bothers me about organized religion, or at least that's one on the things that trouble me.

Anyone else?


I have little doubt that if we were to examine your life, we would find a high degree of conformity to the mores of your peers. You are a member of a flock somewhere, I am sure, even though it may not be religious.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:44 pm
littlek,

Well, I think the problem is people confuses what God condones with what God permits. God permits many things but He doesn't condone them.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:45 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Those people who do bad things are thinking, in their mind, that they are doing those things in the name of God. Sure, they are irrational and perhaps deluded, but they seem to believe that.

We, as Christians, deplore that and in no way agree with it. It is, however, reality that we cannot ignore.


It's called faith. Unquestioning faith. No matter the religion, when an individual carries out an act because he believes it is the will of God (whatever God he may be following) he imparts his faith on the lives of others. All acts of faith could be discounted as irrational and deluded. No one group has the market on faith. No one group has a justification to impose it's version of faith on the world. No one knows Truth.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:45 pm
Similar mores are one thing - entire belief systems are another all together.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:47 pm
J_B WRote:

Quote:
It's called faith. Unquestioning faith. No matter the religion, when an individual carries out an act because he believes it is the will of God (whatever God he may be following) he imparts his faith on the lives of others. All acts of faith could be discounted as irrational and deluded. No one group has the market on faith. No one group has a justification to impose it's version of faith on the world. No one knows Truth.


J_B, what good would faith be if we questioned it all the time? What good would God be if He had to prove Himself to mortal man?

I have to disagree with you about no one knows truth. I agree no one knows the 100% truth, but one can and does know truth.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:49 pm
real life wrote:

I have little doubt that if we were to examine your life, we would find a high degree of conformity to the mores of your peers. You are a member of a flock somewhere, I am sure, even though it may not be religious.


hmmm, let me think about that....

I'm self employed, not a soccer mom, don't drive an SUV, call foul where I see it in my community rather than avoid rocking the boat. It's possilbe real life, but I'm much more a coyote than a sheep. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:51 pm
J_B wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Those people who do bad things are thinking, in their mind, that they are doing those things in the name of God. Sure, they are irrational and perhaps deluded, but they seem to believe that.

We, as Christians, deplore that and in no way agree with it. It is, however, reality that we cannot ignore.


It's called faith. Unquestioning faith. No matter the religion, when an individual carries out an act because he believes it is the will of God (whatever God he may be following) he imparts his faith on the lives of others. All acts of faith could be discounted as irrational and deluded. No one group has the market on faith. No one group has a justification to impose it's version of faith on the world. No one knows Truth.


How about good acts? Do you dismiss those as well and suggest that because they are done in faith they should be discounted? Are you so naive as to think that those who do not have faith do not impart their views on others? If no one knows truth... then why should we believe what you are saying?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:53 pm
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:56 pm
And your point is?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:56 pm
J_B wrote:
real life wrote:

I have little doubt that if we were to examine your life, we would find a high degree of conformity to the mores of your peers. You are a member of a flock somewhere, I am sure, even though it may not be religious.


hmmm, let me think about that....

I'm self employed, not a soccer mom, don't drive an SUV, call foul where I see it in my community rather than avoid rocking the boat. It's possilbe real life, but I'm much more a coyote than a sheep. :wink:


Coyotes run in packs, don't they? :-)
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 08:56 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
[
J_B, what good would faith be if we questioned it all the time? What good would God be if He had to prove Himself to mortal man?

I have to disagree with you about no one knows truth. I agree no one knows the 100% truth, but one can and does know truth.


Faith brings solace to those who have it. That's where it is good. So for those who have faith, it wouldn't do them any good to question it because then they wouldn't have the solace they get from it. God doesn't have to prove anything. God either is or isn't. God can only be known through the lens of the person looking. You know the truth, and I know the truth, and everyone else knows the truth (with the exception of some agnostics who refuse to take a stand), but no one knows Truth. Maybe Truth is the compilation of all of our truths. Maybe we're all partially right and in combination we've got it covered, maybe not.

My point MA is as strongly as you believe your truth is right, so do those who believe only their truth is right. All acts carried out in the name of faith can be considered irrational and deluded because they are based on truth, not Truth.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 05:48:46