0
   

Marijuana laws, racially motivated?

 
 
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 12:42 pm
Marijuana Stamp Act was passed on Oct. 2, 1937 - cannabis wasn't illegal til then. Certainly, it had been vilified in newspapers with headlines such as "Murder Weed Found Up and Down Coast: Deadly Marijuana Plant Ready for Harvest That Means Enslavement of California Children." Harry J. Anslinger commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, was a vociferous foe of cannabis. In his book, Assassin of Youth, he labeled marijuana "dangerous as a coiled rattlesnake," and anguished, "How many murders, suicides, robberies, criminal assaults, holdups, burglaries, and deeds of maniacal insanity it causes each year, especially among the young, can be only conjectured."
Indeed. Texas cops insisted that because it fueled a "lust for blood" and imbued its imbibers with "superhuman strength," pot was the catalyst for unspeakably violent crimes. Marijuana was associated with black jazz musicians and Mexicans in border towns.
"I wish I could show you what a small marijuana cigarette does to one of our degenerate, Spanish-speaking residents," was a comment from Floyd Baskett, editor of the Daily Courier in Alamosa in 1936.
On Oct. 2, 1937, in the somewhat shady Lexington Apartments at 1200 California St. in Denver, Samuel R. Caldwell became the first person in the United States to be arrested on a marijuana charge. Caldwell, a 58-year-old unemployed laborer moonlighting as a dealer, was nailed by the FBI and Denver police for peddling two marijuana cigarettes to one Moses Baca, 26. Caldwell was sentenced to four years' hard labor at Kansas' mighty Leavenworth Prison.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,726 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 01:04 pm
It's a Stamp Act! Isn't that unconstitutional or something? Around these parts (New England) some time back we Tared and Feathered people for trying to enforce one of those.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 01:07 pm
That's interesting, but consider how marijuana was associated with white college students 30-40 years ago. They should've legalized it then, if race were the criterion for these laws.

Then again, considering the difference in penalties for crack and cocaine, there definitely is a bias...
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 07:28 pm
I read somewhere that it had something to do with prejudice against Mexican farm labourers. But then I wouldn't be surprised if it was more that they weren't buying and consuming alcohol and using marijuana instead and outlawing marijuana was about protecting the brewers/distillers interests.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2005 10:56 pm
Yep, complaints about Mexican migrant workers and their "weed" started to surface around the 1920's. Anti-Marijuana laws sprung up in states with significant populations of Mexican immigrants. Basically, it was an attempt to control these populations. The situation came to a head during the great depression, and concern about Mexican immigrants taking sparse jobs away from Americans. As Dr. David Musto said in an interview with Frontline for a program about America's war on marijuana, "Then in the 1930s, when the Great Depression hit, these people became a feared surplus in our country. People tried to get them to go back to Mexico. They were thought to be undercutting Americans for jobs, and they were thought to take marijuana, go into town on the weekends, for example, and create mayhem."

Pressure for a national anti-marijuana law came primarily from Southwestern and Western states, areas with significant Mexican populations.

According to Musto, Anslinger didn't want an anti-marijuana law at first because of the burden it would put on the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.
"Now, how to control something that was in fact a weed, something that had been grown in the United States for hemp since the 18th century was a real problem. And the head of the narcotics bureau, Harry J. Anslinger, really did not want, in his heart, a federal anti- marijuana law. Because he saw it as putting a tremendous burden on the Federal Bureau of Narcotics [FBN]. They got no more money, they got no more agents, and they're supposed to stamp out a weed. He was telling me that once he was driving across a bridge in the upper Potomac, he stopped his car, and he got out, and he says, there it was-- marijuana, as far as you could see it on this river. And he said, 'This, they want me to stamp out.'"

BUSTED america's war on marijuana
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2005 11:11 pm
Prohibition has always been racially motivated, or at the very least class conscious.
The focus turned to the evil weed after the prohibitionists were unable to ban the firewater the dirty irish and italian catholics imbibed.
Black smoked pot, the orientals had their opium and hispanics the coca plant. Must be an ungodly pastime if all these ruffians are enjoying it, eh!
I wish, just for once, the christian right and their far reaching policies and misguided belief system would learn to lighten up and stop screwing up the world the rest of us want to enjoy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Marijuana laws, racially motivated?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 10:33:23