1
   

What is the language of understanding - Julius Fann, Jr - May 12, 2011

 
 
jufa
 
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2025 10:18 am
https://attachment.tapatalk-cdn.com/17598/202310/1267138_eaa76372d690deff2f2cbd5aa53078a7.jpg


When one has not reached into their own discerning Spirit and touched their secret place of silence from which their inner man receives Christ's revelational Word, they cannot become a companion to the universal. What then is the language of flesh which the Creator can comprehend and understand of humanity's outer objective vision, or inner subjective feelings?

The sleeper lives in dual relativism defying objectification of silence precision, never comprehending there is never evolution within a seed, only a freeing awakening and bursting from the imprisonment of seed's shell of containment.

Words spoken by supposed sages or idiots using the label bishop of prophet are relative only to those uttering them and never definitive. To become aware of words spoken, one must realize all languages automatically apply to living and attest to the reality of human existence within individuals, groups, organizations and accepted definitions according to thoughts and feelings objectifying the consciousness of the human head, whether of high or low comprehensive understanding.

Wisdom's language isn't something gained from books, or passed words of hearsay in the sense of application to humanhood in a lifetime, but mentalism of material touching does. Wisdom is the structure that applies to the Causation of all things, even that which has not been discovered by the human mind. This is why discrimination of words cannot be applied to gender, race, sex, creed, color, or shape. All are concepts based upon yesterday's determination of our ancestor's assumption as to what this is, and this is not. What does this mean, and what does it not mean? The true meaning is individualized to the individual's language experience capped by feelings, events or activities concerning their lives, not the lives of writers, philosophers, sages, and gurus. Only the activity which has affected one's individual consciousness nerve system and vibrating sensitivity conditioning beliefs, then building, and existing within those beliefs which has cause and effect towards their linguistic decisions made.

Such decisions are never balanced because the penetrating influential minds have intruded into one's experiential understanding to speak of reality to another mind without the experience of precisive objective and subjective mind patterns of thoughts adopted by the mass language, which cannot be generalized to fit one and all minds. Individuals, no matter the breed or gender, therefore, are always under the influence of other minds, which means individual will of responsibility of any circumstance, condition, or situation alters the reality of that which is whole, perfect, complete, and pure. Any concept, theory, or idea, offered by another, accepted, then given out as reality is dead. When one's life is lived as if these adopted influences were originally their experiences, one becomes a walking dead man.

For one to apply and affiliated anyone with religion, God or standard of living outside of the actuality of what they know and have experienced is a disease that becomes a death warrant to all who believe, and then attach, or allow that disease to become a part of breathing, and the blood flow of their utterance.

"Awake thou that sleepest, arise from the dead and Christ will give thee life." What Christ?

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 45 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

Related Topics

Languages and Thought - Discussion by rosborne979
english to latin phrase translation - Discussion by chelsea84
What other languages would you use a2k in? - Discussion by Craven de Kere
Translation of names into Hebrew - Discussion by Sandra Karl
Google searching in Russian - Discussion by gungasnake
Can you give me a advice? - Discussion by sfsling
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is the language of understanding - Julius Fann, Jr - May 12, 2011
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/07/2025 at 06:22:35