3
   

Authors of the Gospels

 
 
Reply Sun 26 Oct, 2025 03:05 pm
My analysis finds that three of the Gospels are eyewitness testimonies about Jesus and one is a creation of false teachers to help the take control of the beginning church of Jesus Christ.
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Oct, 2025 03:58 pm
@Investigator,
Prove it.
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 26 Oct, 2025 04:09 pm
@Investigator,
Quote:
My analysis finds that three of the Gospels are eyewitness testimonies about Jesus and one is a creation of false teachers to help the take control of the beginning church of Jesus Christ.


And who are the false teachers that you are referring to? Are they the three Gospel authors who recorded their eyewitness testimonies about Jesus, or are you referring to some un-named others?
Investigator
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 02:13 am
@edgarblythe,
First prove to me that three of them are Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
Investigator
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 02:16 am
@The Anointed,
According to Daniel and Revelation prophecy, the group of false teachers who is also referred to as the beast and the Mother of All Prostitutes, is the Catholic Church.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 05:12 am
@Investigator,
You made the assertion. The burden is on you.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 05:26 am
@Investigator,
Quote:
My analysis finds...

Reinterpreting mythological texts from long ago doesn't prove anything and merely adds to the volumes of nonsensical claptrap that have already been foisted on gullible people for two thousand years.
Investigator
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 06:03 pm
@Investigator,
I make that comment because there is no evidence to prove that those men authored the Gospels. The first step in realizing that eyewitnesses of Jesus wrote three of the Gospels is to prove it to yourself that the stated authors named Matthew, Mark, and Luke are fictional stories of tradition because there is no evidence to support them.
0 Replies
 
Investigator
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 06:04 pm
@edgarblythe,
Reinterpreting mythological texts from long ago doesn't prove anything and merely adds to the volumes of nonsensical claptrap that have already been foisted on gullible people for two thousand years.
0 Replies
 
Investigator
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 06:08 pm
@hightor,
They are far from being mythological texts. A document analysis indicates that they are eyewitness testimony and the contents of them can be used to identify the authors. In addition, my analysis of miracles in the Gospels-including about half of the resurrection accounts, prove that Jesus rose from the dead.
The Anointed
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 07:06 pm
@Investigator,
Luke, like his companion Saul, who was later named Paul, never knew the living man Jesus and wrote his Gospel according to the stories told by others who had known the man Jesus.

Mark who is believed to be the son of Peter, and John the beloved disciple and nephew of Jesus, being one of the two sons of Salome, one of the sisters of Jesus who had married Zebedee.

And Matthew who knew that Mary was pregnant, before Joseph ben Jacob consummated his union with her, only after she had given birth to her firstborn son Jesus, the biological son of her half-brother Joseph ben Heli AKA Alexander Helios, who was the father of both Mary and her half-brother Joseph by different mothers.

And it was Matthew who said; “Now all this happened to make come true the words of the prophet (Isaiah) ‘An unmarried woman will conceive and bear a son and he shall be called Immanuel, which means God (Who filled the man Jesus with his spirit on the day of his baptism) is with us. For everyone who has ever seriously studied the scriptures knows that Isaiah never did say that a virgin would conceive, etc.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2025 07:41 pm
@Investigator,
Investigator wrote:

According to Daniel and Revelation prophecy, the group of false teachers who is also referred to as the beast and the Mother of All Prostitutes, is the Catholic Church.



So if the Catholic Church wasn't established, we would all be Jewish. Stick that in your pipe.
The Anointed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 28 Oct, 2025 01:26 am
@glitterbag,
Why would we be Jewish? There were many Christian bodies before Constantine established the Roman church as the one belief that all others should agree with.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Oct, 2025 09:05 am
@The Anointed,
Constantine did not establish the Catholic Church
Constantine did not establish the Catholic Church, but he played a significant role in its organization. In 325 AD, he convened the First Council of Nicaea, which aimed to address theological disputes and resulted in the establishment of the Nicene Creed, a foundational statement of faith for many Christian denominations, including the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church considers itself a continuation of the early Christian community established by the Disciples of Jesus, dating back to the day of Pentecost. Additionally, the term "Catholic" was used before Constantine's time, indicating that the Church existed prior to his influence. Thus, while Constantine was instrumental in shaping the Church's structure, he did not create it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Authors of the Gospels
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/28/2025 at 09:43:27