Kant and theology

Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher of the 18th century, was a deontologist, meaning that he believed that the morality of an action is determined by its conformity to duty, rather than its consequences. He argued that we should act in accordance with the Categorical Imperative, which is a universal moral law that we can derive through reason.

Kant would likely argue that homework cheating is morally wrong because it is a violation of the Categorical Imperative. Specifically, he would argue that cheating is a form of lying, and that lying is wrong because it undermines the trust that is essential for human relationships. Additionally, he would argue that cheating is unfair to other students who are putting in the hard work to learn the material.

Here is an example of how Kant might argue against homework cheating:

Premise 1: We should always act in accordance with the Categorical Imperative, which states that we should act only on maxims that we could will to be universal laws of nature.
Premise 2: Cheating is a form of lying.
Premise 3: Lying is wrong because it undermines the trust that is essential for human relationships.
Conclusion: Therefore, homework cheating is wrong.
Kant would also likely argue that homework cheating is wrong because it is a form of self-deception. When we cheat, we are essentially cheating ourselves out of an education. We are not learning the material, and we are not developing our critical thinking skills. As a result, we are more likely to struggle in the future, both academically and professionally.

Overall, Kant would likely argue that homework cheating is morally wrong because it is a violation of the Categorical Imperative, it undermines the trust that is essential for human relationships, and it is a form of self-deception.

The comments offered here are interesting, but ( I say with reluctance) irrelevant to my question. Can anyone answer my question?