Consider the new IPhone I'm willing to bet that the programming is very similar to the previous IPhone with some changes. Would anyone suggest that the iPhone evolved from the previous one? Of course not!
The technology applied to new devices has way evolved when you compare the old ones with the new ones.
Before a computer was a wall to wall machine, with a program that required books similar to the old big size telephone books for learning how to use it.
Today, computers inside watches and phones replace and have more, better, and easy to learn programs than the old wall to wall computers.
Evolving means to expand, to unfold, a change from worst, inferior and simple status into a better, superior and more complex status.
Looking an DNA keeping in mind that the genetic code comes from a four letters alphabet is it any wonder that there are similarity between organisms in their DNA?
The answer is as it follows. You use the same or similar construction materials to build homes, skyscrapers, building stores, etc.
The materials are cement, wood, glass, iron, plastic, paint, nails, etc.
Then, you have similarities between single houses with skyscrapers, because both use similar materials. The quality of the materials are different but the materials themselves are similar, like wood floors, perhaps different brands and finish, but wood floors in both constructions.
This is the explanation I have presented in 1999, when creating the theory of the recycling process of life on earth.
Just like the IPhone needed a programmer to make the upgrades between the addition so to organisms need a programmer to make the upgrades between organisms. That programmer is Hashem.
Actually what Hashem has made is the first organisms.
Since their creation, the process throughout generations has not been "upgrading" but "degrading".
Our genetic composition is a degenerated one when is compared with the primeval genetic composition. The genetic structure of the first organisms was more complex. It is a fact that the primeval cells were more complex when compared with the current cells of the species.
On the other hand, our technology has evolved, but remember that this is about technology only, because when is about wisdom, men in the past were wiser than today's man.
In simple words, our organisms keep degenerating while our technology keeps evolving.
If anyone can understand what exactly this comparison is saying please shed some light
I understand that your comparison falls in the category of "error".