1
   

Bush Proves How Far Removed He Is

 
 
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 10:18 am
Rep. George Miller
09.09.2005
Bush Proves How Far Removed He Is

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, President Bush proved once again just how far removed he and his Administration are from the life experiences of most Americans. The President issued an executive order on Thursday that makes it possible for federal contractors to pay extremely low wages to workers hired for the Gulf Coast rebuilding. Bush accomplished this by suspending the 1931 Davis-Bacon law, which says that federal contractors must pay their workers a "prevailing wage" on construction projects.

Contrary to the misinformation coming from the right wing - that prevailing wages are actually high "union wages," as John Fund wrote on The Huffington Post last week - the truth is that the prevailing wage is just the average wage for a specific job function in a local area. In parts of the Gulf Coast, these wages for construction workers can be low - even as low as $7, $8, or $9 an hour.

Deep poverty is a major part of the story of Hurricane Katrina, as is now plain for all of us to see. How are New Orleanians and other people in the region supposed to get back on their feet if they can't even make $7 an hour? Hundreds of thousands of people have just lost everything they had. America has to put Gulf Coast workers back to work - and at wages that can help them and their families get back on their feet. Davis-Bacon guarantees a wage floor when they get back to work. If the President wants to help storm victims he should rescind his executive order immediately.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,648 • Replies: 35
No top replies

 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 10:24 am
no matter how far removed from Americans. it can't be far enough.
0 Replies
 
Chrissee
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 10:29 am
The prevailing wage is $8 an hour, Bush wants to pay less than that!!! This is unconscionable.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 10:43 am
Well, look who raised him?? His mother thinks that most of the victims of katrina are now better off than they were before. The fact that, no matter how less-than-grand their surroundings were, at least they had something to call their own, apparently escapes her. Now they have maybe three or four feet of space on a bleacher in the Astrodome to share with their kids and parents, if their lucky enough to have their family with them. But your president's mama says that they're better off now. That's the mindset that he was raised under.
0 Replies
 
Chrissee
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 03:26 pm
White House Faces a Firestorm

Casualty of Firestorm: Outrage, Bush and FEMA Chief


By ELISABETH BUMILLER
Published: September 10, 2005
Quote:


WASHINGTON, Sept. 9 - To Democrats, Republicans, local officials and Hurricane Katrina's victims, the question was not why, but what took so long?

Republicans had been pressing the White House for days to fire "Brownie," Michael D. Brown, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who had stunned many television viewers in admitting that he did not know until 24 hours after the first news reports that there was a swelling crowd of 25,000 people desperate for food and water at the New Orleans convention center.



Mr. Brown, who was removed from his Gulf Coast duties on Friday, though not from his post as FEMA's chief, is the first casualty of the political furor generated by the government's faltering response to the hurricane. With Democrats and Republicans caustically criticizing the performance of his agency, and with the White House under increasing attack for populating FEMA's top ranks with politically connected officials who lack disaster relief experience, Mr. Brown had become a symbol of President Bush's own hesitant response.

The president, long reluctant to fire subordinates, came to a belated recognition that his administration was in trouble for the way it had dealt with the disaster, many of his supporters say. One moment of realization occurred on Thursday of last week when an aide carried a news agency report from New Orleans into the Oval Office for him to see.

The report was about the evacuees at the convention center, some dying and some already dead. Mr. Bush had been briefed that morning by his homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, who was getting much of his information from Mr. Brown and was not aware of what was occurring there. The news account was the first that the president and his top advisers had heard not only of the conditions at the convention center but even that there were people there at all.

"He's not a screamer," a senior aide said of the president. But Mr. Bush, angry, directed the White House chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., to find out what was going on.

"The frustration throughout the week was getting good, reliable information," said the aide, who demanded anonymity so as not to be identified in disclosing inner workings of the White House. "Getting truth on the ground in New Orleans was very difficult."

If Mr. Bush was upset with Mr. Brown at that point, he did not show it. When he traveled to the Gulf Coast the next day, he stood with him and, before the cameras, cheerfully said, "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."

But the political pressures on Mr. Bush, and the anxiety at the White House, were only growing. Behind the president's public embrace of Mr. Brown was the realization within the administration that the director's ignorance about the evacuees had further inflamed the rage of the storm's poor, black victims and created an impression of a White House that did not care about their lives.

One prominent African-American supporter of Mr. Bush who is close to Karl Rove, the White House political chief, said the president did not go into the heart of New Orleans and meet with black victims on his first trip there, last Friday, because he knew that White House officials were "scared to death" of the reaction.

"If I'm Karl, do I want the visual of black people hollering at the president as if we're living in Rwanda?" said the supporter, who spoke only anonymously because he did not want to antagonize Mr. Rove.

At the same time, news reports quickly appeared about Mr. Brown's qualifications for the job: he was a former commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association and for 30 years a friend of Joe M. Allbaugh, who managed Mr. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign and was the administration's first FEMA director. Mr. Brown's credentials came to roost at the White House, where Mr. Bush faced angry accusations that the director's hiring had amounted to nothing more than cronyism.

Members of Congress quickly weighed in. Senator Mary L. Landrieu, a Louisiana Democrat who was in New Orleans or Baton Rouge for more than a week after the hurricane swept ashore, said of Mr. Brown last Friday that "I have been telling him from the moment he arrived about the urgency of the situation" and "I just have to tell you that he had a difficult time understanding the enormity of the task before us."

Members of Mr. Bush's party also were angry. Last week House Republicans pressed the White House to fire Mr. Brown. Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi pulled the president aside for a private meeting on Monday in Poplarville, Miss., to ask him to intervene personally to untangle FEMA red tape. Mr. Lott, exasperated, told Mr. Bush that he needed to press the agency to send the state 46,000 trailers, promised for days as temporary housing for hurricane victims.

For a time, Mr. Lott did not directly criticize Mr. Brown or the federal response in public. "My mama didn't raise no idiot," he joked on Capitol Hill last week. "I ain't going to bite the hand that's trying to save me."

But on Friday, with Mr. Brown's tenure in the relief role at an end, the senator issued a statement that made clear his views, and those of many others.

"Something needed to happen," Mr. Lott's statement said. "Michael Brown has been acting like a private instead of a general. When you're in the middle of a disaster, you can't stop to check the legal niceties or to review FEMA regulations before deciding to help Mississippians knocked flat on their backs."

Mr. Bush, characteristically, did not officially dismiss Mr. Brown, instead calling him back to Washington to run FEMA while a crisis-tested Coast Guard commander, Vice Adm. Thad W. Allen, was given oversight of the relief effort. The take-charge Admiral Allen, who commanded the Coast Guard's response up and down the Atlantic Seaboard after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, immediately appeared on television as the public face of the administration's response.

In Baton Rouge, Mr. Brown appeared briefly at Mr. Chertoff's side before heading back to the capital, where, the secretary said, the director was needed for potential disasters.

"We've got tropical storms and hurricanes brewing in the ocean," Mr. Chertoff said.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 03:50 pm
Great! If Ophelia comes ashore in my neck of the woods, Brown need not show up at all.

From the above article Chrissee posted:

Quote:
One moment of realization occurred on Thursday of last week when an aide carried a news agency report from New Orleans into the Oval Office for him to see.

The report was about the evacuees at the convention center, some dying and some already dead. Mr. Bush had been briefed that morning by his homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, who was getting much of his information from Mr. Brown and was not aware of what was occurring there. The news account was the first that the president and his top advisers had heard not only of the conditions at the convention center but even that there were people there at all.

"He's not a screamer," a senior aide said of the president. But Mr. Bush, angry, directed the White House chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., to find out what was going on.

"The frustration throughout the week was getting good, reliable information," said the aide, who demanded anonymity so as not to be identified in disclosing inner workings of the White House. "Getting truth on the ground in New Orleans was very difficult."


Bull! You can't tell me that NO ONE closer to the president than Chertoff had turned on a single newscast in the four days following the largest natural disaster to hit this country.

The above is an out and out LIE! Someone purposely passed on, under condition of anonymity, (Rove?) this image of Bush as angry to push the blame onto Brown and away from the president. Reporters were all over the place broadcasting live and showing the horror, but the White House can't get reliable information for four days?

PATHETIC little Weasel!
0 Replies
 
Chrissee
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 03:57 pm
Quote:
"He's not a screamer," a senior aide said of the president. But Mr. Bush, angry, directed the White House chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., to find out what was going on.

"The frustration throughout the week was getting good, reliable information," said the aide, who demanded anonymity so as not to be identified in disclosing inner workings of the White House. "Getting truth on the ground in New Orleans was very difficult."


I guess Bush didn't pay his cable bill?


Can you believe this spin?
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 04:02 pm
Contracts have already been issued to Haliburton / KBR for repairs and clean up related to Katrina. You wouldn't want them to have to cut into their profits by actually having to pay a decent wage, would you?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 05:29 pm
squinney wrote:


PATHETIC little Weasel!


Laughing How do you Really feel about him, Squinney? Laughing
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 05:44 pm
I could go on, but I really don't need any dark coats showing up.

At this time, when the plight of the poor is highlighted as never before in his lifetime, he has the nerve to sign an executive order benefiting corporations AGAIN?

My previous comment was too kind.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 05:45 pm
BUSH PROVES HOW WE HAVE TO REMOVE HIM
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 05:51 pm
Can we call for a vote of no confidence? Wrong country, I know, but I like the concept.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 05:59 pm
I don't care what we do, but lets do somthing.Look how people helped people in New Orleans.The government acually made it worse.We would have been better off without them.If their not going to do the job we created them to do then they should get out of the way.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 06:05 pm
Although the president is responsible for everything that happens in the country, everything that happens in the country isn't his fault. When it became clear that the relief efforts were ineffective, Bush publicly declared that they were "unacceptable" and went down there personally. Now he has relieved the FEMA director of Katrina responsibility and put someone else in charge. He has acted as a strong leader to solve problems which were not of his making.

Your Bush expose #1000 is just as absurd as your previous 999, and as your next thousand will be. I'm still waiting for him to receive a dishonorable discharge from the National Guard.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 06:06 pm
It was bad enough he got elected the first time. It was depressing when he was re-elected. Many said it was the voice of the Moral Majority who won him the election but his own campaign position was that between he and Kerry, ONLY HE COULD KEEP THE COUNTRY SAFE!!! I firmly believe that position kept him in the White House more than his position on gay marriage and family values.

Obviously he was, and is, full of crap.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 06:10 pm
He didn't really win.Do some reseach and you will see for yourself.The truth is out their
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 06:21 pm
Brandon, Bush IS the problem. He declared an emergency in the wrong half of Louisiana. His signature is on the line.

He appointed Brown. His signature is on the line.

Leaders lead and take responsibility for their staff. The manager at Home Depot hires people to help run the store. When a load falls off a forklift and onto a customer, the home office doesn't just fire the employee that stacked the boxes when it's clear the Manager didn't qualify or train the employee for driving a forklift. The Manager is held accountable. Too many screw ups and the regional manager may be in danger as well for allowing a poor manager to stay in charge. Can you imagine the home office listening to excuse after excuse from the manager or regional manager for why it is never their fault?

We are the home office. Our representatives in DC are the regional managers. Bush is the manager and Brown the employee.

Get it? Bush works for us and he's really screwing our bottom line. He has failed to ever take responsibility for anything. Bush is not a leader.

We need to send him to New Orleans to help rebuild at $7 an hour.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 11:59 pm
Amigo wrote:
He didn't really win.Do some reseach and you will see for yourself.The truth is out their


Laughing And where should we go to do this "research"?

Shall I check the nut job conspiracy theorist websites in my bookmarks?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2005 12:16 am
squinney wrote:
Brandon, Bush IS the problem. He declared an emergency in the wrong half of Louisiana. His signature is on the line.

He appointed Brown. His signature is on the line.

Leaders lead and take responsibility for their staff. The manager at Home Depot hires people to help run the store. When a load falls off a forklift and onto a customer, the home office doesn't just fire the employee that stacked the boxes when it's clear the Manager didn't qualify or train the employee for driving a forklift. The Manager is held accountable. Too many screw ups and the regional manager may be in danger as well for allowing a poor manager to stay in charge. Can you imagine the home office listening to excuse after excuse from the manager or regional manager for why it is never their fault?

We are the home office. Our representatives in DC are the regional managers. Bush is the manager and Brown the employee.

Get it? Bush works for us and he's really screwing our bottom line. He has failed to ever take responsibility for anything. Bush is not a leader.

We need to send him to New Orleans to help rebuild at $7 an hour.

Like I said, everything that goes wrong in the country is his responsibility, but not everything that goes wrong is his fault. That is true of every manager. Is Clinton at fault for the $40 billion damage from the Northridge earthquake? As soon as it became apparent that things weren't proceeding well, Bush both acted and went to the affected areas personally. Louisiana has existed for a long time. Why did no one ever build adequate levees? Why is there so much poverty and crime in New Orleans? Why don't you blame the past few governors? This is just another absurd chapter in your continuing effort to pin everything from poverty to solar flares on Bush.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2005 08:04 am
Brandon, Tico, your president is a punk.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Proves How Far Removed He Is
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 01:47:28