Why it would be Un-Islamic for Muslims to oppose Israel’s right to exist

The dispute over the land of Israel is not due to religion, but rather to the “Palestinian” Arab “Palestinian” Arab territorial ambitions, and their ethnic-hatred of Jews.

The following is why it would be Un-Islamic for Muslims to oppose Israel’s right to exist:

The right of the Jewish people to their ancestral homeland of Israel is recognised in the noble Quran. There are references within the Quran to the Jewish Scriptures (aka “Old” Testament), being connections usually overlooked by Muslims because Muslims do not recognise nor study those Scriptures.

The “Palestinian” Arabs (and their anti-Semitic supporters) are obliged to claim propaganda-fantasy that both falsely-denies the Judah heritage of the Jewish people (“Jew”=citizen of “Judah” - Judaism is both an ethnicity as well as a religion), and also falsely-claims the “Palestinian” Arabs are descendants of Jews. This is to dishonestly evade the noble Quran’s recognition that the Land of Israel is given by Allah / God to the Jewish people (noble Quran: Sura “Al-Maaida” 5:21).

The reason for such propaganda is to perpetrate a hoax that Jewish Israelis are foreign invaders, as an attempt to justify stealing the land from its indigenous Jews.

Note:
Obviously there is room here only for quoting the relevant verses. Regarding those who automatically claim I have quoted “out of context”, the reader should be aware that there is nothing contraditory within the “context”. If there were, they would be able to explain how the context changes one’s understanding of the quoted verses.

Referring to the Bible where it talks about the Jewish people being given the land of Canaan by Allah / God, the noble Quran recognizes that the Land of Israel is given by Allah / God to the Jewish people, saying:


The context from which the extract from the Quran is taken supports that recognition (for example, the previous verse 20 mentions Moses); and if someone alleges that it does not, then the reader should expect them to be able to explain that !

Where the noble Quran recognises (“Al-Maaida” 5:21) that the land of Israel is given by Allah / God to the Children of Israel (Jews), the Quran is referring to the Jewish Scriptures (aka “Old” Testament) - IN WHICH the Covenant between Allah / God and the Children of Israel, IS Everlasting.

In recent times Muslims have been inaccurately-taught that the Jewish Scriptures are “corrupted”, causing them to ignore it. The Arabic word “tahrif” used in the noble Quran has in recent times been interpreted to mean “corrupt”, but means either: “alteration” or “misinterpretation”, and past Islamic scholars translated it to mean rather: “misinterpretation”:
http://www.judaism-islam.com/islam-teaches-torah-is-corrupted-tahrif-but-what-does-that-mean/


The Jewish Temple built at the Temple Mount / Haram al-Sharif, is mentioned in the noble Quran, and is also described by it as a “Masjid” meaning “Mosque”:


In Surah Al-Isra (The Journey by Night) 17, the Islamic Prophet Muhammad was miraculously transported overnight, from the “Al-Masjid al-Haram” (the Sacred Mosque) in the vicinity of the Ka’ba Mecca, to the “Al–Masjid-al–Aqsâ” (the Farthest Mosque) identified in Islamic teaching as the “Haram al-Sharif” / “Temple Mount” Jerusalem.

However, during the Islamic Prophet’s lifetime there was NO mosque in Jerusalem, as the Islamic conquest of Jerusalem did not take place until 637 CE / 16 AH, which was after the Islamic Prophet’s death in 632 CE / 11 AH.

Therefore the “Masjid” at the “Al–Masjid-al–Aqsâ” (“the Farthest Mosque”) to which the above verse refers, can only be the Jewish Temple:



The reader can view a simulation of King Solomon’s Temple, (King of the Jewish Kingdom of Israel), here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiF-wObznds


The noble Quran also mentions kings of Israel - examples: