@hightor,
Contributor "hightor" wrote:
Quote:[...] I mistakenly assumed you were sophisticated enough to separate objective facts from a partisan interpretation. [...]
While one can gain an impression from biased sources, the impression one has to accept is really more an understanding of the author's bias; such sources are not a good guide to accurate information.
I do not agree, as the contributor alleges, that:
"objective facts" can be "separated" "from a partisan interpretation".
Contributor "hightor" copied a Fact Check from MSN, which includes the following:
Quote: [...] former U.S. President Donald Trump praising the formation of plans for Project 2025 [...] [my italics]
Therefore what Donald Trump said was
prior to the issuance of "Project 2025".
Contributor "hightor" also wrote about the clip within the video in question and my comment upon the clip that it appears to be heavily-edited:
Quote:Of course it is. The event was probably hours long. The excerpted clip, however, does not appear to have been edited
The contributor appears to be conflicted whether the clip in question was heavily-edited.
He wrote: "Of course it is."
Or,
whether the contributor considers the clip to not have been edited.
Because he also wrote about it: "The excerpted clip, however, does not appear to have been edited".
The clip in question is clearly heavily-edited as anyone who views it can see. This means the extracted bits shown, are untrustworthy on their own.