6
   

Voter/Election Fraud

 
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 06:58 am
@ntprof,
Quote:
Do you think anyone disagrees with that?

Well yeah. More than a few state legislatures have passed these laws and there are obviously quite a lot of people who would just as soon see less voter participation from groups they hate or fear. Someone even down-voted my comment within a few minutes of my posting it!

I thought it was telling that you, as a self-identified political naïf, raised concern about voter fraud (non-systemic and rare) but never mentioned voter suppression, which is actually sponsored by state governments. For some reason the misconceived "stolen election" story gets more attention than the reality of disenfranchised voters.
ntprof
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 07:09 am
The ERIC situation is interesting and seems logical based on my initial reading. I have a few immediate questions with more to follow:

New York and California do not use ERIC. Why not?

The founder, David Becker, appears to have George Soros ties. He also left ERIC to form CEIR. I haven't looked much into CEIR yet. Any thoughts there?

I see where a few Red states have bailed on ERIC. I'm still looking into their reasons, however, would anyone like to share their thoughts?
ntprof
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 07:22 am
@hightor,
I consider voter fraud and voter suppression to be very different, therefore did not wish to muck-up the topics. I hate rabbit-trails...

I'll start a suppression thread soon.
tsarstepan
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 07:34 am
@ntprof,
ntprof wrote:

New York and California do not use ERIC. Why not?


I'm not sure but I did find the following possible remedy to that.
Quote:
On the flipside, California and New York have bills to authorize joining multistate voter list maintenance organizations. That is, ERIC or an equivalent.

More Withdrawals From Voter Data Group ERIC Likely

From a 2023 article with the subheading:
Quote:
Eight Republican-controlled states so far have cut ties with the multistate consortium, which helps to ensure accurate voter rolls, citing concerns over privacy and transparency.
By Wendy Underhill | June 20, 2023
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 08:14 am
@ntprof,
Quote:
I consider voter fraud and voter suppression to be very different, therefore did not wish to muck-up the topics.

Hardly a "rabbit trail" as both frustrate the will of the electorate. My point is that allegations of voter fraud have gotten more attention but disenfranchisement has greater practical effect.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 08:14 pm
Fired director of US cyber agency Chris Krebs explains why he says vote was
"most secure in American history"

Chris Krebs, a lifelong Republican, was put in charge of the agency handling election security by President Trump two years ago. When Krebs said the 2020 election was the country's most secure ever, Mr. Trump fired him. Now, Krebs speaks to Scott Pelley


Published November 29, 2020

Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 08:30 pm
Rupert Murdoch and Fox surrendered. Truth won big. Rupert lost.

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell explains how Rupert Murdoch and his lawyers botched the legal strategy
in surrendering to Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million on the first day in court.


Published April 18, 2023


0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 08:37 pm
Rudy Giuliani concedes he made 'false' statements about Georgia election workers.

Rudy Giuliani conceded that he made “false” statements about two Georgia 2020 election workers in a court filing Tuesday
related to their lawsuit about baseless claims of fraud that he made against them.


Published July 26, 2023


0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 10:49 pm
@ntprof,
Quote:
At face-value, of course voter suppression would be an issue. Do you think anyone disagrees with that?


1. The problem I have is you stating that at face-value, voter suppression would be an issue.

2. I believe that voter suppression is clearly an issue.

3. There is a difference between the word "would" and "is"

4. The way you are using the word "would" implies that voting suppression (isn't) an issue.

5. Also, your use of term "at face value" is questionable.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 11:34 pm
Trump’s election fraud cases failing in court, still no evidence.

The Trump administration has brought more than two dozen cases to court, but judges have still not found evidence of widespread fraud.


Published November 16, 2020


0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Mar, 2024 11:44 pm
Trump campaign officials, led by Rudy Giuliani,
oversaw fake electors plot in 7 states
.



Published: January 20, 2022


Quote:
QuoteTrump campaign officials, led by Rudy Giuliani, oversaw efforts in December 2020 to put forward illegitimate electors from seven states that Trump lost, according to three sources with direct knowledge of the scheme.

The sources said members of former President Donald Trump's campaign team were far more involved than previously known in the plan, a core tenet of the broader plot to overturn President Joe Biden's victory when Congress counted the electoral votes on January 6.

Giuliani and his allies coordinated the nuts-and-bolts of the process on a state-by-state level, the sources told CNN. One source said there were multiple planning calls between Trump campaign officials and GOP state operatives, and that Giuliani participated in at least one call. The source also said the Trump campaign lined up supporters to fill elector slots, secured meeting rooms in statehouses for the fake electors to meet on December 14, 2020, and circulated drafts of fake certificates that were ultimately sent to the National Archives.

Trump and some of his top advisers publicly encouraged the "alternate electors" scheme in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada and New Mexico. But behind the scenes, Giuliani and Trump campaign officials actively choreographed the process, the sources said.

One fake elector from Michigan boasted at a recent event hosted by a local Republican organization that the Trump campaign directed the entire operation.

"We fought to seat the electors. The Trump campaign asked us to do that," Meshawn Maddock, co-chair of the Michigan Republican Party, said at a public event last week that was organized by the conservative group Stand Up Michigan, according to a recording obtained by CNN.

Maddock was also one of the 16 Trump supporters from Michigan who served as fake electors and signed the illegitimate certificate that was sent to the National Archives.

"It was Rudy and these misfit characters who started calling the shots," a former Trump campaign staffer said. "The campaign was throwing enough sh*t at the wall to see what would stick."

Integral to the Jan 6 plan

The scheme was integral to Trump's plan to get then-Vice President Mike Pence to throw out Biden's electors and replace them with the GOP electors on January 6 when Congress counted the electoral votes. It has also come under renewed scrutiny by the January 6 select committee and state attorneys general, raising questions about the involvement of Trump's campaign and whether any laws were broken.

Committee chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi told reporters Thursday the panel is looking into whether there was a broader conspiracy or involvement from the Trump White House in the creation or submission of these fake electors.

"That's a concern" Thompson said.

In its subpoena letter sent to Giuliani on Tuesday, the House committee specifically references his efforts to convince state legislatures to overturn election results. The document cites Giuliani's comments from December 2020 in which he publicly urged lawmakers in Michigan to award the state's electoral votes to Trump.

One of the pro-Trump electors from Pennsylvania, Sam DeMarco, told CNN there was a last-minute dispute, where the state's GOP electors pushed Trump campaign officials to add legal caveats to the fake certificate to say they were only electors-in-waiting, if Trump's legal challenges prevailed.

The fake documents from Pennsylvania and New Mexico ultimately contained these caveats, but the documents from the other five states explicitly claimed, falsely, that the pro-Trump electors were the rightful electors.

It's not clear that any of the fake electors themselves participated in strategy sessions with top Trump campaign brass. But both Maddock from Michigan and DeMarco from Pennsylvania have said they were in direct contact with members of the Trump campaign.

Many of the players involved in the scheme, including Maddock, stand by their actions and are still pushing the lie that the 2020 election was stolen. Giuliani, a Trump spokesperson and a representative from Stand Up Michigan did not respond to CNN's requests for comment.

Advancing the lie that the election was stolen

After Trump failed to stop battleground states from certifying Biden's victory, Trump campaign officials, led by Giuliani, launched its parallel effort to disrupt and undermine the Electoral College process. This included publicly promoting false claims of fraud, while quietly exploring the fast-diminishing avenues to overturn the results.

Trump hoped Republican legislators from the seven battleground states would replace Biden's authentic electors with the rogue GOP slate, and that Pence would seat those electors during the joint session of Congress on January 6.

A source familiar with the situation told CNN that Pence was concerned about the possibility of "alternate electors," and his team carefully worded what he said that day during the Electoral College certification to recognize only the legitimate electors.

One of the sources with direct knowledge of the scheme, a former Trump campaign staffer, told CNN that Giuliani worked closely on the seven-state stunt with Christina Bobb, a correspondent for the pro-Trump propaganda network One America News.

Many of Giuliani's unhinged conspiracies about the 2020 election found a home at OAN. And in a deposition last year as part of a civil lawsuit, Giuliani said Bobb was "very active in gathering evidence" as "part of the legal team" working for Trump's campaign during the presidential transition.

Bobb reached out to a top Arizona legislator about supposed voter fraud, according to emails obtained by the government oversight group American Oversight through a public records request. In the December 4, 2020, email Bobb said she was sending the message on Giuliani's behalf. The emails flesh out how Trump's team was trying to press state legislatures to overturn the results.

Bobb didn't respond to messages seeking comment about the pro-Trump electors.

"They were all working together. Rudy, John Eastman, and Christina Bobb, in tandem, to create this coverage for OAN, to advance the Big Lie," the former Trump campaign staffer told CNN.

While mainstream news outlets covered the Electoral College proceedings, which cemented Biden's position as President-elect, OAN focused on the rogue electors and voter fraud myths.

The Washington Post first reported new details about the role of Giuliani and Bobb.

Battleground Michigan

Republicans in Michigan were central to the effort to try and overturn the election results and Meshawn Maddock -- along with her husband State Rep. Matt Maddock -- were instrumental to the effort inside the state.

The Maddocks have deep ties to Trump. The former president has endorsed Matt Maddock in his bid to be Michigan House leader. Maddock tweeted a photo last year of an article written about his campaign that Trump had signed, and added, "Matt, I am with you all the way."

In the months leading up to January 6, Matt Maddock consistently pushed Trump's lie about the election. In early December 2020, Matt Maddock and other state GOP lawmakers in Michigan held a series of hearings seeking to validate unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud -- prompting a personal visit from Giuliani.

When the effort to convince state legislators in Michigan to block Biden's electors ultimately failed, Maddock was among the GOP lawmakers from five states who sent a letter to Pence on January 5, urging him to delay certification of the electoral votes. Pence refused to go along with the plan.

Meshawn Maddock is equally close to Trump and is still peddling the lie that the election was stolen.

Along with being an elector, she also helped organize buses to take GOP activists to Washington for protests around January 6 and took part in the march to the US Capitol. She later disavowed the violence that came after the march.

Maddock was named co-chair of the Michigan Republican Party one month after January 6. But as she is gaining prominence, her role as a fake elector is also attracting legal scrutiny.

"Under state law, I think clearly you have forgery of a public record, which is a 14-year offense, and election law forgery, which is a five-year offense," Michigan Attorney general Dana Nessel, a Democrat, told MSNBC last week, about the fake certificates signed by pro-Trump electors.

No one, including Meshawn Maddock, has been charged with any crimes related to the scheme.

"This is nothing more than political prosecution of convenience led by Dana Nessel," said Gustavo Portela, MIGOP Communications Director, when asked about Maddock's comments and role as a fake elector.

Hedged language in Pennsylvania

The documents from Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and Nevada explicitly stated, falsely, that the GOP electors were the rightful electors, representing 59 electoral votes.

But the documents from Pennsylvania and New Mexico contained clauses saying that the Trump supporters were electors-in-waiting, in case a court or some other proceeding later ruled that they were the "duly elected and qualified electors."

If anything, this provided a veneer of legal protection for Trump supporters who were trying to exploit the Electoral College process to overturn an election.

Demarco, who was one of the state's pro-Trump electors, and is the chairman of the Allegheny County Republican Committee, told CNN he and other alternate electors signed the certificate at the Trump campaign's request but first demanded the language be changed to make clear it was not intended to contest the will of voters in that state who voted for Biden.

The hedging language was included at the last moment as the Trump campaign had concerns, and questioned whether the change was appropriate in the immediate lead-up to December 14, according to a Trump campaign staffer with knowledge of the matter.

Ultimately the Trump campaign acquiesced. But the internal debate shows that even some of Trump's strongest allies were concerned about the attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

The office of Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said in a statement that they looked into the matter but concluded that the fake certificate was not an illegal forgery.

"These 'fake ballots' included a conditional clause that they were only to be used if a court overturned the results in Pennsylvania, which did not happen," the statement said. "Though their rhetoric and policy were intentionally misleading and purposefully damaging to our democracy, based on our initial review, our office does not believe this meets the legal standards for forgery."

Concerns about democracy

Democratic lawmakers, state officials, and Biden himself have roundly condemned the fake electors plot. Biden brought it up at a news conference Wednesday when asked about his stalled voting-rights bills in Congress.

"I never thought we would get into a place where we were talking about... what they tried to do this last time out -- Send different electors to the state legislative bodies to represent who won the election, saying that I didn't win but the Republican candidate won," Biden said. "I doubt that anyone thought that would happen in America in the 21st century, but it is happening."

The coordinated nature of these fake elector efforts and the rising power of Big Lie-promoters in Republican circles has concerned voting rights organizations across the country.

Nancy Wang, executive director of the Michigan-based Voters Not Politicians, said her group was founded in 2016 to address redistricting and voting access, but Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election spurred her group to focus on countering anti-democratic efforts at large.

"This is existential. This about the very fundamental institutions of our government - whether we can vote at all, whether we have any power whatsoever," Wang said. "It is a completely different time that we are facing in 2020 and 2022. It really feels urgent. It is a battle of a completely different kind. It is massive, it is coordinated at a national level. It is much more threatening."


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-campaign-officials-led-by-rudy-giuliani-oversaw-fake-electors-plot-in-7-states/ar-AASZb3H?ocid=uxbndlbing
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Mar, 2024 12:42 am
@ntprof,
Quote:
Accusations by both sides are a given, historically.

There is some admission and/or evidence of this fraud happening, however it seems to always be written off as 'Not enough to make a difference'.

Should anything be done about this?

If yes - what?


1. I'm not certain of these accusation by both sides you are asserting.

2. The relevant question is: What is deemed frivolous without merit that lacks evidence in a court of law?

3. The other relevant question is: What has merit and is supported by evidence in a court of law?

4. I hope you are not equating "cases that have merit and are supported by evidence" with "frivolous cases without merit that lacks evidence"
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Mar, 2024 10:09 am
Christopher Krebs defended election integrity. Trump fired him.

President Trump announced in a tweet Tuesday night that he was firing Christopher Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

Krebs has been credited by many for securing American elections from fraud and foreign interference -- but drew Trump’s disfavor by defending the election’s integrity from Trump’s false claims. Nick Schifrin joins Judy Woodruff to discuss.


Published November 17, 2020

0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Mar, 2024 11:18 am
My dreams and desires in American elections are as follows:

1. I wish that (one hundred percent) of every eligible voter participate in every election by casting a legal vote in every election.

2. When I say every election, I am referring to Presidential elections, midterm elections, special elections, off year elections, etc.

3. I wish that (one hundred percent) of all eligible voters (never) skip (any) election.

4. I wish that instead of having just (one day) as an election day, that we all would have (a whole month) leading up to that day to go to the polls to vote.

5. When I say (a whole month) I mean seven days a week for four consecutive weeks.

6. If people are gradually going to the polls for (a whole month) leading up to election day, that would eliminate long lines all the way through the election season.

7. I also wish that all voting machines have paper trails attached to each machine, just in case a hand recount is needed.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  3  
Reply Sun 24 Mar, 2024 01:24 pm
@ntprof,
Quote:
There have been accusations and convictions of voter fraud, including the 2020 election.
I'm independent and looking to make an informed vote(s). If any v-fraud is happening, I'd consider it important.



1. Do you feel that this thread you started, made you more informed as a voter?

2. There is nothing wrong with being an informed voter.
Phoenix32890
 
  3  
Reply Mon 25 Mar, 2024 06:00 am
My DIL voted in the 2020 election. She received a receipt stating her voting preferences. The receipt showed that she had supposedly voted for people in the opposite party. They changed her vote for the correct one.

My question to you all: How many people got their voting receipt, and didn't even bother to look at it???
ntprof
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 25 Mar, 2024 06:53 am
@hightor,
fyi: As promised, I started a separate thread about voter suppression... Thanks.
0 Replies
 
ntprof
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 25 Mar, 2024 07:33 am
@Real Music,
The 60 minutes video was interesting. Krebs did a compelling job of saying "trust me" and as then cyber-agency director, we should trust him.

Krebs is a staunch supporter of paper ballots.

I still find it odd that Arizona takes so long to process their election when Florida completes it in a day. (Both use paper ballots) I get it that Florida does things differently prior to voting day. But Arizona could adopt Florida's method and certainly get same day results with 3x less population. (7m v 22m) A delay like that is always going to cause controversy - and rightly so. It doesn't need to be that way.
0 Replies
 
ntprof
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Mar, 2024 07:38 am
@Real Music,
Quote:
1. Do you feel that this thread you started, made you more informed as a voter?

2. There is nothing wrong with being an informed voter.


Yes, it's certainly helping. Thanks...
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2024 08:44 pm
'The real voter fraud': Supreme Court stalling leaves illegal gerrymandered map in place for 2024


After South Carolina's congressional election map was found by a court to be unconstitutionally gerrymandered, the case was sent to the Supreme Court on expedited appeal. But the expedited request was apparently not enough to motivate the Supreme Court to rule in time for the 2024 election, so South Carolina will be using the unconstitutional map. Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, discusses with Alex Wagner.


Published March 29, 2024

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 03:42:03