Setanta wrote:You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Who me?
Quote:For a third party to succeed in this country, they'd have an uphill struggle all the way--the entire process is now set up to exclude a third party, precisely because the Republicans and Democrats fear such an event.
Well, we agree that a third party won't be of much use after its formation. Just for different reasons.
Quote:That does not, however, make it impossible. Arguments from analogy about "a spokesperson for alcoholics anonymous" are just silly, and have no force.
That was just a passing remark.
Here is a list of Prime Ministers from the United Kingdom. Notice how Liberal Democrats are nowhere on the list. The Liberal Party, which later on merged with the Social Democrats to become the Liberal Democrats used to be the Second Party back when Labour was an early party.
The third Party has never been elected into power. Only when one of the two major parties weakens does the third Party get elected into power and once that happens, the Third Party never seems to get back into the top two.
This in effect means, despite how many parties you have, you will always end up with a Two Party System with a race between the top two parties, which is, I guess what you described.
Quote:Certainly a two party system might be ok if the two parties are substantially different. Here we have nothing of the sort and what's happened is that one party is completely marginalized and no longer a true opposition. We need something else to step in. Could it end up a two party system again with this new party displacing the democrats or the republicans? Probably, and maybe that would be ok. But right now, voters need a third option.
I don't know, but it seems as if the political climate in the US and UK are identical in that the opposition party isn't much of an opposition and the third party isn't much of an opposition either.
I fear for our politics.