Research on the Root of Quantum Mechanics

Piggy thinks of that good man Mr. From Opium and travels back to this galaxy to do something. Thanks him again.

Piggy added some more details into the chapter “The Solutions to Hard Problems about the Speed of Probability Wave” and has declared it elsewhere.

Latest:
The Solutions to Hard Problems about the Speed of Probability Wave

Now we have a try to solve those two hard problems about the speed of probability wave delivered in the first chapter with the new conception of “electric wave” and the “Chen’s Physical Model of elementary particle”.

1. The range of velocity of 0 ＜ v ＜ c is just the character of movement of spherical electromagnetic wave. (For details, please see my article of “Research on the Root of Special Relativity”.)
As a whole, spherical electromagnetic wave doesn’t demonstrate wave characteristic. It demonstrates particle characteristic only.
Wave is the wave characteristic of electric interaction, not the wave characteristic of the particle of matter state 1 such as electron itself. The “wave” and the “particle” are different independent things. It’s unnecessary for the speed of “electric wave” “u” to be in conformity with the moving speed of the particle “v”.
A vivid analogy: A boat moves on the water and activates water wave. The water wave and the boat are different independent things. It’s unnecessary for the speed of water wave to be in conformity with the moving speed of the boat.

2. The Chen’s physical model for a released photon is “a section of electromagnetic wave travelling in straight line”, “a section” is from the angle of “particle” while “electromagnetic wave” is from the angle of “wave”. Of course v = u = c. Perfect conformity. Notice, at this moment, “u” changes to be the speed of electromagnetic wave rather than the speed of the “electric wave”.

Addition:
In QM, for a free particle, ︱ Ψ ︱² = ︱ A ︱², A is a constant. It means the probability of presence of the particle is the same in the whole space. It’s not understandable. Even it’s not in conformity with fact. Now we have a try to employ the conception of “electric wave” explain it exactly.
Assume a free particle or say ideal neutral particle move relative to another free particle or say ideal neutral particle, no“electric wave” would be activated.
Ψ = 0, Ψ* = 0, ΨΨ* = ︱ Ψ ︱²= 0.
c∫0→+∞︱ Ψ ︱²d 𝛕 = 0
As illustrated ahead, the real physics meaning of “probability density” ︱ Ψ ︱² in QM should be to describe the electric force. The above equation can be interpreted as: for a free particle or say ideal neutral particle, the electric force it subjected should be zero, the same in the whole space.

The Chen’s physical model of elementary particle and the conception of “electric wave” can be in perfect consistent with Duc de Broglie’s original idea of “γ = E / h, while λ = h / P”.
The old flawed conception of probability wave should be given up.
QM should be the science to research the wave characteristics of electric interaction, or say, wave function should be to describe “electric wave”.

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
Pig Head Committee USA
Nov 26, 2025

Thanks that good man Mr. From Opium again, piggy moves a paragraph from “The Chen’s Physical Model of Subatomic Particles” here, which has been declared elsewhere:
The Chen’s physical model of elementary particle of matter state 1, (the simplified model “circle type standing wave”), demonstrates there are two sub - structures in an elementary particle of matter state 1: the forward travelling wave as well as the backward travelling wave. I call such sub - structure “layer”.
(diagram omitted)
A “layer” is considered to carry “1/2” unit charge.
The “layer” in my physical model of elementary particle is a specific physical sub - structure. I always worry people might misunderstand it as “level” or “surface”. So, I contemplate to create a new word “suber” to replace the word “layer”.
The number of “level” or “surface” can be infinite inside to the center in math. But although each “level” or “surface” deposits a bit of internal energy, such a solid body can deposit infinite internal energy. It’s not in conformity with fact.
Seems there are a few “level” or “surface” inside would be okay too. Human did created sandwich…But I appreciate the principle of “nature pursues simplicity”.
So, in my physics model of elementary particle of matter state 1, internal energy is deposited in one spherical surface.
I feel something wonderful: The mathematical model of unit charge also demonstrates there are two layers / subers in an elementary particle of matter state 1. (They activate two “electric waves” when they are moving.
1 = (1/2) + (1/2) = (1/π)∫0→+∞（1/r）sin r p dr + (1/π)∫0→+∞（1/r）sin r p dr
For details, please see my article “Research on the Root of Quantum Mechanics”.) The mathematical model is in conformity with the physics model. No contradiction happens with analysis from different angle. “Coincidence” again? Or Sciences are all interconnected?

Materials for reference:
The Philosophy of the Energy – Mass Equation
https://able2know.org/topic/555934-9#post-7404950
“Coincidence” again? Or Sciences are all interconnected?

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
Pig Head Committee USA
Nov 26, 2025

Now piggy doubts whether the pig head understands physics or not as the what coffin box from what CN said in PHF in 2020:
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/the-game-of-match-sticks.16181/post-50090
In fact, shortly after piggy left PHF in 2020, a local guy stopped piggy on the street and insisted he had a physics question to ask me. Piggy just replied to that guy: “I know nothing about physics”. Bounce…
Neila9876@htam9876:
This tramp in cosmos really doesn’t think that any normal Chinese would intentionally PRESENCE in PHF galaxy to attack this pig. It must be the trick of the First Order to sabotage my effort there.
他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代，全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵