The holes in the cosmos

PRESENCE's only concern with the right and left or the left and right is that they are symmetrical. PRESENCE steps back therefore and views both the left and right or right and left knowing that it is only possible to obtain that symmetry if you balance a +/- with a +/- or black and white with black and white

PRESENCE therefore only sees "glassy" holes or a "glassy" sea within an electromagnetic field. All matter having disappeared within the holes.

SYMMETRY.

Metaphysics-

PRESENCE is a definite term in REAL science.

PRESENCE must not be confused with Observer/Observed.If we talk Observer/Observed then to obtain symmetry we can only balance Observer/Observed by the formula Observer/Observed=Observer/Observed. I mean how would you ever decide what you were for goodness sake.... the observer or the observed? That just forms part of the dualistic "merry go round" or "hamsters wheel" as I call it.

PRESENCE is AWARE of this so does not associate with Observer or the Observed.

So rather than associate with the components of the system PRESENCE sees the overall balanced system and works within the constraints of it. An example of this being that the electromagnetic force interactions between two spinning objects cannot be cancelled out. They can only be VIBRATORY balanced,once gain by the formula +/-=+/- .PRESENCE does not associate with these two equal but opposite forces therefore.

PRESENCE has to be seen as completely separate from Observer or Observed.

Another term for PRESENCE is "i am"

Science has to start considering that the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos preceded the big bangs and big crunches. The only reason it can't broaden its horizons to consider this possibility is because it is so hung up on the gravity theory which scientifically is a "one sided" theory. It therefore remains trapped in UNAWARENESS with this one sided theory.

Science requires a SYMMETRICAL theory.

Modern day scientific theories have reach the end of the road.They are unsymmetrical theories that can go no further.These theories are being found to be incorrect by observation.Science needs a symmetrical theory.There will always be scientists who prefer to keep returning back again and again to the same old vomit, which is a shame.

If all matter disappears into all the spinning holes in the cosmos (observations are confirming this is work in progress) then all that will be left is spinning holes within electromagnetic fields because the electromagnetic fields which saturate the cosmos will still remain.

If any scientist in the world thinks not, then they will need to explain why not.

Your topic is superlative, although we should note that massive galactic holes are either spinning or not, and charged or not, according to those who know a little about such matters.

Ontological perspectives are a valuable yet separate discipline to epistemological theory.

What we should note is that matter is presently disappearing into multiple holes which should not be described as "black" because that is not the correct scientific term for a hole. A hole is a hole and "glassy" is the correct term to use.
These holes are within electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos. These elctro-magnetic fields will still be in place when all matter disappears into these multiple holes.

If you think not, then you will need to provide the scientific proof for that.

All sciences are interconnected so you are mistaken when you state .......Ontological perspectives are a valuable yet separate discipline to epistemological theory.

Where this is going is that the electromagnetic fields that remain and the 2 forces that these fields produce throughout the cosmos absolutely do not cancel out but rather they vibratory balance by the formula +/-=+/-

SYMMETRY.

As all the sciences are interconnected then we need be able to relate these sound philosophical and scientific principles to the cognitive.

PRESENCE resides in the midst of the vibrating electromagnetic fields.The thoughts of PRESENCE oscillate as they pass through these vibrating electromagnetic fields.

PRESENCE experiences a vibrating/oscillating or “toggling” experience, as I call it, at the consciousness level in the form of the in and out of the moment consciousness states.

Both Tesla and Einstein did agree on one thing at least.

Everything in the cosmos vibrates.This isn’t due to unsymmetrical science however.It is due to SYMMETRICAL science.

Tesla practiced symmetrical science.Einstein practiced unsymmetrical science.

Science prefers to guess that all matter entered the cosmos via a single hole and will disappear via a single hole.

Personally, I prefer to know that all matter enters the cosmos via multiple holes and will disappear via multiple holes.

The electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos preceded all matter.

It can only have happened that way for symmetrical science.

So we have PRESENCE and “glassy” holes within vibrating electromagnetic fields and not a single BB or single BC for the start and end of everything.

PRESENCE absolutely does not see holes as “black” or “white” but rather PRESENCE sees them as “glassy”.

“Glassy” is the correct scientific term for the holes in the cosmos because it is a SYMMETRICAL scientific term and not an UNSYMMETRICAL scientific term like “black” which is presently adopted by modern day science.

One day you're plus the next day you're minus
You can't face the world with your head up your finest
Cut glass is always greener on the other side, they say
To not worry boy, presence is on it's way

Interesting lyrics....

Modern day scientific theories don't do PRESENCE. They don't believe presence exists you see.They still believe that + and - cancel out.

They still don't understand electromagnetic force interactions and the effects that these balanced +/- vibratory reactions have on the consciousness experience.

PRESENCE balances these + and - forces across the sciences by the formula
+/-=+/-

Glassy is NEUTRAL but still has decision making within.

Glassy=Glassy

SYMMETRY.

The fundamental point to grasp with + and - is that as they cannot be defined, philosophically, you should not GUESS and assume +=- and -=+.

The only way to be absolutely sure that the formula balances is by adopting the formula +/-=+/- and see if nature agrees.

This formula matches with nature as this is the only way that you can balance the electromagnetic forces between 2 spinning electromagnets thus producing a vibratory balance and SYMMETRY.

All things spin at both the macro and micro levels within the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos.

A hole is a hole and in REAL science and is described as “glassy” and NOT black or white.

REAL science has balanced the electromagnetic forces of nature with the SYMMETRICAL formula +/-=+/-

When it comes to the ultimate morality question of good and bad, let me ask this question.

If good and bad cannot be defined then what is the wiser SCIENTIFIC option (PHILOSOPHICALLY) for a formula/s if you want assurance that SYMMETRY is always maintained in a UNITED rather than DIVIDED formula/s

Good =Bad and Bad=Good OR Good/Bad=Good/Bad

Real science has all matter disappearing into multiples holes.These hole are described as “glassy” and not black or white.The electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos remain after all matter has disappeared and the holes within these electromagnetic fields still have their 2 equal but opposite pole forces which are vibratory balanced with all the other holes.PRESENCE remains having successfully balanced these forces of nature SYMMETRICALLY with the formula +/-=+/-