1
   

A professional's evaluation of Bush's mental health

 
 
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:21 am
A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
A professional's evaluation of Bush's mental health

Dear President Bush,

At this time of national crisis, I would like to offer my assistance to you. As a practicing psychologist for more than thirty years, it has become clear to me that your mental health has been seriously neglected. In the interest of our nation, I would like to offer my services as a psychologist to you on a "pro bono" basis. It would, after all, be for the good of the country.

Of course, it would be presumptuous of me to attempt to diagnose your emotional difficulties without meeting you face to face. However, I believe that I have had sufficient opportunity to observe you to put forth a few hypotheses of "trouble" areas with which you seem to need assistance.

First, and of great concern, is evidence of delusional thinking - a symptom of psychosis. The delusion that seems most evident is that bombing a people into submission is a strong foundation for democracy, and for generating good will in a nation. There is also the delusion that Saddam Hussein poses an imminent threat to the USA. (Or was that just a lie, suggesting psychopathic deviance?) Another symptom that many people have noted is disorganized and incoherent speech, which, unfortunately, can be another symptom of psychosis.

Confused thinking is also a problem for you, as demonstrated by the idea that our reason for going to war is Iraq's defiance of the UN, yet you are defying the UN by going to war. This suggests rather muddled cognitive functioning.

These symptoms suggest that I would feel that a referral to a psychiatrist for medication might be indicated. However, your history of multiple substance abuse should lead to caution in the use of certain psychotropic medications.

While there are some indicators of psychosis, there are also many signs of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which include arrogance and grandiosity, as well as a need for unlimited power. There is also a lack of empathy for others, and, in your case, no regard for them at all if they speak another language.

You suffer from an excessive need for admiration and a sense of entitlement. Evidence for that includes your refusal to speak before the European Union unless you could be guaranteed a standing ovation. Your actions regarding attacking Iraq in spite of negative world reaction reveal your arrogance in a clear and obvious way.

Emotional immaturity has been in evidence as well. The tendency toward black and white thinking is one sign of emotional immaturity. Statements that divide the world into good and evil, and "you're with us or against us" reflect thinking typical of a young child. Emotional growth and development is known to be stunted by substance abuse. Could that be what happened with you?

Problems with the truth are also in evidence, as in such statements as "I am a man of peace", "I am a uniter (sic) not a divider" and "I'm hopeful that we can avoid a war." None of these statements enjoy the support of your behavior. While a certain amount of lying is expected from politicians, yours seems to be well in excess of the norm.

Although I have a busy schedule, I am confident that my current patients, in the service of their country, would be willing to change their schedules to accommodate you. I also need to warn you that I cannot guarantee relief from all the above symptoms, as personality disorders are notoriously difficult to treat.

Therefore, in order to pursue your recovery, it might be wise to consider resigning from the stresses of your current position to devote your time to your psychological well being.

Sincerely,
Diana DeVito
Clinical Psychologist
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,804 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:29 am
BBB- Could you please supply a link to this article? And who is Diana DeVito, and what are her credentials that would enable her to diagnose Bush?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:41 am
The link to Buzzflash follows - I don't know anything of the author. BBB

http://www.buzzflash.com/
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:43 am
Much as I dislike Bush's policies and find his public persona quite repellent, I find myself quite irritated by these sorts of things.

Either the writer is a qualified mental health professional, in which case they ought to know better than to engage in such an exercise in arrogance and misuse of their skills - not to mention the ethical problem in pretending, without proper assessment, and in a public manner, to diagnose mental disorders.

Or, they are not, in which case this is futile posturing.

Why not attack the man's policies and decisions - and leave diagnosis of his personality to any mental health providers he may have, or to history?

If he is really believed by a qualified person to be psychotic, then there are, presumably, proper channels to follow?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:20 am
long history of presidential mental health evaluation
The author obviously has an opinion re Bush and may well have applied the same criteria to a number of presidents. However, there is a long history of professionals evaluating the mental health of presidents and presidential candidates without direct examination of the person. There have been a number of books written by respected professionals on this subject.

I found some interesting sites re this topic:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0765804263/qid=1048950832/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/103-7162021-2313434?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

http://www.csbsju.edu/uspp/Resources/Syllabus.html

http://www.cqpressbookstore.com/polofpresrev.html
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:24 am
I will have a look - though I think it a highly questionable activity if undertaken by real professionals - on living subjects - unless they are really mad and need to be removed.

If Bush is actually mad, then so are many of his close advisers - a folie au mille!
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:26 am
Exactly Deb. Even if this person is a real professional, they have ZERO clue as to what is going on day to day in the Whitehouse and ZERO knowledge of why he may be saying things.

Perhaps the writer should be consulting a professional themselves since she apparently is having delusions of granduer... Of course, one shouldn't expect anything more than that from "BuzzFlash".
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:33 am
Oh? I know nothing of Buzzflash - I better go have a look!

(Nice to see ya!)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:42 am
Heehee - I signed up!
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 09:42 am
BuzzFlash et al
BuzzFlash is one of the more rabid anti-bush, anti anything except Democrats sites. Its article headlines are often misleading. However, the site is a good source for news articles from a variety of sources. I usually ignore the personal opinion comments because of their bias, but sometimes they are fun to read.

BushWatch, on the other hand is a much more responsible site and less misleading in its article headlines. It is anti-Bush and anti Republican et al, but has excellent news article sources I find of value---that I can judge for myself.

I enjoy sites that express ironic and parody humor that reflect Mark Twain's comment that "Sacred Cows make the best hamburger."

There are other equally rabid anti-Democrat sites that one can visit if one is inclined to that perspective.

As for myself, I say a pox on both their houses!

BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:01 am
LOL!

I liked the number of different sources one could get a glimpse of - not especially interested in American poliutics in terms of the Dem/Repub thing - only really how America affects the rest of the world.
0 Replies
 
CodeBorg
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:24 am
LAUGHTER IS THE BEST THERAPY
Dudes ... did you really take this therapist letter as real?
In a friendly way, I say "Lighten up ... Don't focus so hard and take everything so seriously!"

Oh, no, no, no.... By the third paragraph it's obviously sarcasm. A joke.
Somebody thinks "our President is a madman!" and is just pointing out all the reasons why they think so.

It's a spoof. A satire. Tongue-in-cheek. Hamming it up.
Absolutely and clearly not genuine offer for free therapy services.
The vocabulary and crude approach is completely off for a therapist,
though the humor is very dry.

As a political statement, s/he does make some good points, and make us think.


The final tip-off, if it's not clear by the end: "Danny DeVito" is the pudgy comedian who plays Louie on "Taxi".
0 Replies
 
PatriUgg
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:37 am
Gadzooks!
Isn't every practitioner required to display "PhD", "LCSW", "MFCC", "CMT", "DCM" or other licensing/certification after their name?












ñlt;a href="http://www.leafspinner.com"ñgt;infoñlt;/añgt;
Code:ñlt;a href="http://www.leafspinner.com"ñgt;infoñlt;/añgt;

Quote:
ñlt;a href="http://www.leafspinner.com"ñgt;infoñlt;/añgt;


<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>
Code:<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>

Quote:
<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>


<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>
Code:<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>

Quote:
<a href="http://www.leafspinner.com">info</a>


http://www.leafspinner.com
http://www.leafspinner.com

www.leafspinner.com
www.leafspinner.com

leafspinner.com
[url]leafspinner.com[/url]
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:39 am
Code, The only thing serious now is the war in Iraq. Otherwise, everything else is open to "lighten up." c.i.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 11:04 am
Re: LAUGHTER IS THE BEST THERAPY
CodeBorg wrote:
The final tip-off, if it's not clear by the end: "Danny DeVito" is the pudgy comedian who plays Louie on "Taxi".


It isn't signed "Danny DiVito". The name listed is "Diana DeVito". She may still be short and pudgy but the gender difference might be significant to her. Wink
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 11:43 am
We have no problem with people creating satire about anyone. One of the joys of living in free countries is the ability of people to make fun of their leaders, without fear of recrimination.

Our problem is that the thread was posted to the General News Forum, which is reserved for REAL news and commentary. Therefore, we will move it to our "Jokes" Forum, where it belongs.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 04:27 pm
I knpw, CodeBorg - I still just find that stuff, even as satire, repugnant - prolly cos it is my area! And prolly cos such labelling has often been used as a weapon against really vulnerable people.

You have a good point, though.
0 Replies
 
CodeBorg
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:10 pm
1) It just hit me how important it is for every practical joke
to have a clear disclaimer, identifying it as a joke, and who to contact
if any unintended damage was incurred.

CalTech hell-week requires this for every prank pulled! Now I appreciate why.

dlowan wrote:
... such labelling has often been used as a weapon against really vulnerable people.

2) Mental health is certainly considered a loaded hot topic (even taboo!) to many, like insulting the Pope. Best to step carefully.

3) And how many lives have been altered by some school counselor saying "You're crazy... You'll never amount to anything". Labelling creates powerful destiny.

4) Also, depending on background, many people may not pick up on a very dry joke -- best to spell things out clearly if you don't want a misunderstanding mob at your door.



... Interesting thoughts in an idle moment. Hmm.
------------
PS -- Using "Diana" instead of "Danny" just struck me as too close for coincidence -- triggered more warning bells for me. (My deep apologies if Diana DeVito is a real psychologist! I couldn't find one on the internet, but that doesn't mean she doesn't exist).

Another tip-off: The letter simply lists one grievance after another, on and on, whereas someone truly offering help would be more interested in tactfully offering help. The letter claims one thing, but does another.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:16 pm
Practical joke disclaimers!

Do I detect the happy voice of irony, CodeBorg?
0 Replies
 
CodeBorg
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 10:18 pm
Disclaimers
Oops, it is more of a "claimer" than a "disclaimer", isn't it? Smile

( or are you thinking of something else...? )
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Oddities and Humor - Discussion by edgarblythe
Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Caption The Cartoon - Discussion by panzade
Geek and Nerd Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Caption The Cartoon Part Deux - Discussion by panzade
IS IT OK FOR ME TO CHEAT? - Question by Setanta
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
  1. Forums
  2. » A professional's evaluation of Bush's mental health
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.79 seconds on 12/03/2024 at 03:50:00