Yossarian's Roost Resuscitated

aun King
shaunking
·
I think it’s safe to say that International Law is dead.

The mechanisms to enforce it have all failed.

The UN has failed.
It has literally allowed a member state to kill hundreds of its workers.

Every treaty, law, convention to prevent genocide has completely failed.

aitlin Johnstone
caitoz
·
People really need to stop taking seriously the idea that Israel has any intention of ever agreeing to a ceasefire. They've made it clear that they're not going to stop until they've kicked all the Palestinians out of Gaza and annexed it, and we should believe them.

Sabby Sabs
SabbySabs2
I think whoever killed Charlie Kirk was a professional shooter. They were pretty far away. And no one saw the shooter aiming the gun. Guess who benefits from this? Israel, the police state, and surveillance. Think about it.
Quote
Jaybefaunt🏳️‍🌈
Jaybefaunt
·
3h
Replying to @realnikohouse
I'm starting to think that Charlie Kirk wasn't killed, he was sacrificed. Now you have top levels of the Israeli government mourning his death. And Charlie Kirk was friends with President Trump. This is going to be used to bring about a massive police state.

They get rid of a voice that makes people hate them, while instigating a series of such incidents, paving the way for Trump to declare martial law and cancel the midterms. Speculation, of course, but -?

I cannot overstate how much Donald Trump and his family loved Charlie Kirk. And you need to understand every move Trump makes through that lens. They were arguably closer with Charlie than any single person in Trump’s entire administration. He was trusted by them. Charlie traveled around the world with them and was truly given open access to their world. And they all felt like Charlie played an essential role in getting Trump reelected.


I say that to say that it may seem to an outsider that Trump is overreacting, but nobody inside of Trump’s feels that way. He was like family to many of them.

I don’t think any of us fully understand how much the daily images of the atrocities in Gaza have impacted how our brains process graphic violence. I saw so many people, who weren’t being callous about Charlie Kirk being killed, commenting on how they now see worse than that 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

And it’s true. I knew Charlie wouldn’t survive, in part, because I’ve seen that same wound on men, women, boys, and girls in Gaza a thousand times. Suddenly, seeing a famous man get shot in the neck and killed doesn’t stand out in our brains the way it should.

Millions of people all over the world are blaming Israel. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like that before. First, a prominent conservative posted online last month that Charlie was afraid Israel would kill him if he said too much about them - which is a pretty huge deal. But secondly, the entire world now knows they will kill anyone, anywhere, so they just conclude they must be listed on the possible subject list. I have no idea who killed Charlie, but I certainly understand how people are coming to this conclusion.

Anybody that is a public speaker in the United States, particularly if you are thought of as controversial at all, has imagined this could happen to them at any given moment, and it’s clear that it’s almost impossible to stop it. Charlie was surrounded by private security. But in a country with more guns than people, it’s almost impossible to stop every scenario with a sniper shooting from 2 football fields away.

I have to run - my hand is already hurting - but I want to make one final point. People have lost so much faith in the government, as we witness governments around the world so willing to cover for Jeffery Epstein, that I don’t think people are going to believe the government when they finally arrest the shooter - unless some kind of indisputable proof exists. They could trot anyone out at this point and we have no idea if they are telling the truth or not.

Sorry I had to end kind of abruptly, but this was a big deal for me as I get back to writing. I will try to write more as soon as I can.

Please forgive any errors - I didn’t have time to proofread, but I hope these thoughts were insightful or helpful in some way.

Love and appreciate you all.

Shaun

They're trawling social media looking for foreigners to ban.

Tourism has already dropped considerably due to stories of being strip searched, having all your devices confiscated and a good chance of incarceration just for not loving Trump.

That's no way to start a holiday, and then there's a good chance of being shot by the natives.

I have no plans to visit America at all, and won't have for a very long time, not until Trump gets the same treatment as Bolsanaro.

If I were anywhere else on Earth I would not consider visiting here. Some of my descendants are partial Hispanic and I have begun to worry abouit them.

I think it's wishful thinking, tying the Israelis in.

I've done a quick google search which shows Israel paying tribute to Kirk.

The people saying it are the same ones who said Israel was behind 9/11, and that was bollocks.

I'm not pushing an Israel tie-in for now, although I wouldn't be at all surprised. Mainly I think it is part of a setup allowing Trump to declare martial law and cancel the midterms.
________________________________________________
eorge Orwell's Angry Ghost
ChrisMarx1917
·
This is right on the mark! We are being played people. Wake up.
Quote
Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚
hippyygoat
·

WAKE UP NOTHING IS RANDOM…
It's all planned...

ALL YOU HAVE TO ASK IS WHO BENEFITS

I just saw a video of the man insisting the Epstein files be made public.

Then I saw that he backed away from that position.

I think that's more likely.

Michael Cavolina
·
THE SUSPECT, TURNED IN BY HIS FAMILY, IS A UTAH MORMON FROM A CONSERVATIVE FAMILY. WHEN DOES THE WHITEWASH BEGIN?

now watch them quickly fry the kid.

no due process needed in this regime...

ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸
ImBreckWorsham
Okay. I'm going to anger many of you here and many of you are going to choose to "unfollow" me and let me start by saying I truly do not care. Unlike many paid "influencers," I make no money off my social media so there is no financial interest in my keeping you here. This isn't prison. Each and every one of you are under no obligation to be here and you are completely free to go. You will not hurt my feelings in the slightest.

Let me also note that I not only voted for Donald Trump during all three of his presidential runs and worked for his 2016 presidential campaigns, but I knew Charlie Kirk. We were in no way best friends by any means, but I met him several times at various campaign events and considered him a friend. He was a good and decent man.

That said, there have been a lot of theories in regard to what happened to Charlie Kirk since his murder on Wednesday and several people have asked me what my theory is.

I don't have a theory. As a former victims rights advocate and Officer of the Court assigned to hundreds of criminal cases, and being trained to spot inconsistencies in investigations, I was quickly able to put the pieces together based on the official story, which simply made no sense.

One of the most notable aspects relating to Charlie Kirk was his very public praise of Donald Trump. Charlie was a tremendous Trump supporter and was very open and vocal regarding his advocacy of the Trump administration. He was also very pro-Israel. Both are something that stood firm all the way up to the weeks just prior to Charlie's assassination.

In his final weeks, if you go back and watch those final interviews and his final shows, he had begun to openly question Mossad. He also said it may be time to question Mossad's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and its influence on the government.

When that happened, that made him a liability.

I am not saying in any way shape or form that I believe Donald Trump had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.

I AM saying I believe the same people who are controlling Trump and who ordered him to do an about face on the Epstein issue, murdered Charlie Kirk.

Having someone who was such a strong public advocate for the president beginning to openly question Israel's involvement in influencing our government, at that point, made him a liability. Charlie had a tremendous reach and an enormous platform with Turning Point. When he began to question who was actually running our government, he stopped being an asset and became a liability.

I believe Trump came into this with, and retained all the way up to his second election in November, the best of intentions and a true desire to save America from the Deep State. But I believe the powers that be pulled him aside after Butler and told him that if they had wanted to kill him that day, they would have, that he should consider that a warning shot and that if he refuses to play the game going forward that they will by no means miss next time. I also believe they have compromising information on him that they are threatening to make public, whether that be about him or one of his children, I do not know, but I believe the combination of the information they have on him and their threats to kill him or harm his family is why he pulled back on the Epstein issue.

Charlie had begun to make the connection.

It is clear to me based on all the information I've reviewed and all thats occurred in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday that Charlie Kirk was murdered by members of the US Government in connection with and at the direct orders of Mossad.

It was done publicly in order to send a very clear and direct message to anyone else with a platform who may dare to publicly question the system.
8:20 AM · Sep 13, 2025
·
163.6K

ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸
ImBreckWorsham
·
6h
The radical left messaging scribbled on the bullets was done to create infighting between left vs right and deflect from government involvement.
ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸
@ImBreckWorsham
·
4h
You have to ask questions. As a woman who owns nearly every gun known to man and who's trained in forensic analysis, personal knowledge dictates a shot with a high powered rifle, as the FBI claims occurred, would have left a much larger wound to the throat. His throat would have essentially exploded. Further, the FBI claims the shot was fired with a Mauser 98 with a 30-06 round. However, the gun they've shown as evidence, which they claim to have found in the woods, appears to be a Remington 700 short action rifle, which will not hold a 30-06 round. That was indication number one that the entire official story was a complete fabrication.
ThePatrioticBlonde🇺🇸
@ImBreckWorsham
·
4h
And let me clarify that I obviously have not examined the weapon they claim to have recovered. I'm saying the photo they released appears to be a Remington 700 Short based only on personal experience with such firearms and based on the government's claim that it was a Mauser with a 30-06 round that was used to kill him.

Interesting responses. My question? Which photo that's been released by the FBI are you basing your arguments that it was, indeed, a Mauser?

Because according to my count, they've released three different photos of what they claim to be the weapon used, each representing three entirely different guns.

Tara
EmbracingTara
·
I can't help thinking that this is all very bizarre and disgusting theatre.

Trump announcing the death. Kirk's wife "Addressing America" not 48 hours after her husband dies when he held no political office and was basically just a well known podcaster (no offense at all). Thanking Trump profusely at the beginning of her speech when Trump was laughing and old-man dancing at a baseball game 24 hours after the murder. Netanyahu repeatedly denying any involvement (very weird). Vance flying the body back on an official government plane, literally carrying the coffin and his wife comforting Erika Kirk for an amazing photo op, sealing the 2028 nomination. His body lying in state!!?!!

His wife uploading videos to Instagram sobbing over his dead body in the coffin, pointedly showing the hands. Stephen Miller claiming Kirk's last words to him were to "destroy the left". Vance's Palantir ties and the digital surveillance state. Social credit scores and the suppression of free speech.

Also a very huge well-timed distraction from the Epstein Files.

The close up video of the graphic murder suddenly appearing everywhere online minutes after his death instead of having been directly handed to the FBI - to traumatize and radicalize the public.

That's not even touching the gunman's story and background, Kirk being threatened for speaking out about Gaza, every influencer and politician (except a precious few)completely capitalizing off this in a really shameful and opportunistic disgusting way.

It is just all very, very WEIRD to me.

I'm seeing many posts on the net showing reasons why the confessed killer of Kirk could not have done it. Some of them actually make sense. What the alternate explanations I've seen fail to do is explain why the confessed killer was on the building and why he turned himself in.

The problem with conspiracies is that they focus attention elsewhere and ignore the very real crimes being perpetrated by Trump's regime.

If he was a patsy he'd be some firebrand leftie with a long history of activism like Trump said. Instead we have a right wing religious nut shooting another right wing religious nut.

A patsy would have been caught/shot with lots of fanfare crediting the FBI for sterling effort instead of being handed in by his dad while the muppet in charge of the FBI was boasting about a wrongful arrest.

The trial should be interesting.

I post many suppositional posts here while waiting for this to make sense. So far I tend to see it much as you described here.

Yes yes yes