Philosophical Implications of Quantum Physics & Relativity

My statement above, I believe, is about the common knowledge on the fact of brain functioning.

From where or what does common knowledge originate?

Time causes memory. Memory lets us notice time.

"Common knowledge" is an oxymoron. c.i.

Elaborate please, C.I..

What's so common about knowledge? c.i.

It's only certain knowledge that is common. Like if I said "Lennox Lewis can hit hard", or "C.I., is a bright guy." Those things are common knowledge, eveyone knows that! :wink:

If time causes memory and memory lets us notice time, would it be safe to say that time lets us notice time?

How do you know that time causes memory?

Memory is a recognition of time. The sun rise of yesterday is a memory at the moment of the sun rise of today. There was a duration of one day.

Time does not exist as an entity. It is a measurement , which means it can be arbitrarily controlled, as it was arbitrarily created, therefore, it can't cause anything.

Booman..
It is your opinion that [t]ime does not exist as an entity. Another person can say, "I think time must be an entity."

Well, it's only a theory of a high school dropout, but I did state a basis for my theory. So perhaps a more learned person could tell me how an arbitrarily determined measurement could be an entity.
(I hope no one saw this before I edited.

Booman..
It could be said that the number "two" was found through measurement. However many working mathematicians think numbers are entities.

Sounds to me like two is the name given to an amount. What I've said is theoretical on my part. If I saw the writings of the people you speak of, I'd either have a basis to argue the point, or back off if I felt my theory was wrong at that point. I'm stubborn, and debative, but not immovable.

Booman..

http://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/bernays/Pdf/bernays13_2002-11-26.pdf

Me and my big mouth. Now I've got homework. I was almost glad the window said try again., but I am curious, I'll check it out after some sleep.

How do you know memory is a recognition of time? Couldn't time be a recognition of memory?

Also Satt..

http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/unm.html

Time can be recognized through memory in its rudimentary form of noticing the lapse of a day, which was stated above.


BTW, I think you should explain what your intention of the link is in this context. Time is a concept of physics, or of life more generally. Mathematics is not concerned with time proper. Math deals with time variable in mechanical systems, but the time variable is simply a variable without any concrete meaning.

The intention of the link was in response to your link.

Chaitin's work in mathematics is largely founded upon Godel's work. Godel worked through Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to discover Godel Universes (GU's). GU's are logically consistent with relativity, but further expound upon the concept of time, ultimately concluding that time possesses no fundamental truth in reality.

Quantum theory (Bell's Theorem, Aspect's experiment, quantum entanglement/tunneling,...) also suggests that time possesses no fundamental truth in reality.

For these reasons as well as others, we were attempting to move beyond the traditionally engrained notion of time and suggest another phenomena which may be able to account for the perception of time while accommodating the implications of mathematics and physics - namely, memory.

My link was in response to Booman's request.