1
   

The Shroud of Turin

 
 
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 11:49 am
Does anyone believe the image on the shroud is Jesus Christ or an art work of Leonardo Da Vinci? Confused
The image does resemble Da Vinci Smile

[/QUOTE]IPSA SCIENTIA POTESTAS EST.
"Knowledge itself is power"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,074 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 11:54 am
I don't have the citation handy, but they did some scientific dating of it, and all authorities agreed that it originated in the 13th century, making it a fake. This is a dead issue.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 11:55 am
And if it dates to the thirteenth century, Leonardo was not yet even a gleem in his daddy's eye . . .
0 Replies
 
Aurelius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 11:59 am
They could only date the shroud but they couldn't date the image on the shroud.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 12:00 pm
so you are saying that the shroud could be only from the 13th century but the image may be thousands of years older Aurelius??
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 12:01 pm
I believe he's still trying to put Leonardo in as a pinch hitter . . .
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 12:01 pm
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Aurelius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 12:06 pm
You have a point there shewolfnm. Since they can't date the image, it can be older.Smile
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 12:19 pm
I wasnt making a point, i was asking if that is what you were getting at?
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 08:03 am
Aurelius wrote:
You have a point there shewolfnm. Since they can't date the image, it can be older.Smile


No, the image would have to be younger. If the shroud itself dates only to the 13th century, the image on it cannot be older. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Aug, 2005 01:06 am
The C14 dating was explained away by believers, saying that the scientists mistakenly tested fibres from a part of the shroud that had been patched in the Middle Ages (leaving open the possibility that the shroud itself is much older).
The scientists testing the shroud also found that the blood stains on the shroud were not made by blood but by a colouring agent containing ironoxide. That part hasn't been explained away, yet.
0 Replies
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Aug, 2005 02:00 am
This thread reminds me of the corny dipiction of how the shroud came about in 'The Passion of Christ'.
Does anyone remember that bit in the film when Jesus mopped his face with a cloth, someone else picked it up, held it up and on it was waht looked like a smiley face!!
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Aug, 2005 05:54 am
material girl wrote:
This thread reminds me of the corny dipiction of how the shroud came about in 'The Passion of Christ'.
Does anyone remember that bit in the film when Jesus mopped his face with a cloth, someone else picked it up, held it up and on it was waht looked like a smiley face!!


And that in turn reminds me of the "Have a Nice Day" scene in Forrest Gump! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Aug, 2005 06:07 am
I think the scene in the movie (which I did not see) would refer to St. Veronica. She is said to have given Jesus her veil to wipe away his sweat and blood. When it was returned to her, his image was on the cloth. There are various religious paintings that illustrate the scene.
0 Replies
 
Badboy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Sep, 2005 06:38 am
One thing does get me.

How did forger know the way cruxifation(sp) worked eg right way nails should go in?
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Sep, 2005 06:51 am
There is nothing mysterious about execution by crucifixion. It remained a common way to kill criminals well into the middle ages. The artist could even have witnessed such a killing.

I always feel if people want to believe in such things they are welcome to do so. Personally, when I look at the shroud I think "early medieval artist's rendering". The guy probably made a tidy sum selling to some rich believers.
0 Replies
 
Badboy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Sep, 2005 06:55 am
Thanks for the explanion,GREENWITCH
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Shroud of Turin
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 05:02:14