Kyle Rittenhouse question

No. There are some crazy people who identify with the political left. Riots represent anomie, not political action. I wouldn't dignify a destructive mob by labeling their acts as "political protest".

You're denouncing people who represent a very small percentage of progressives and liberals. Most progressives and liberals are not extremists.

In Kenosha we had this unrest where people reacting to a police shooting looted, attacked police and burned down buildings.

Do we all agree that this was a violent mob (ratger than a political prot st)?

Your little cartoon here is spewing lies. Kyle did not carry a gun across state lines.

"Kyle Rittenhouse cleared of gun charges in Illinois: 'Gun never left the state of Wisconsin'" "“Kyle did not carry a gun across state lines. The gun belonged to his friend, a Wisconsin resident."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-cleared-of-gun-charges-in-illinois-gun-never-left-the-state-of-wisconsin

So you are posting lies.

The media and the Joe Biden administration are proven liars.

Social Media Companies Suppressed Claims of Kyle Rittenhouse’s Innocence

https://freebeacon.com/media/social-media-companies-suppressed-claims-of-kyle-rittenhouses-innocence/

CBS is 'straight up libelous' as they tweet Rittenhouse 'told the jury he murdered two men' 'They will slander you happily if they think you have bad politics'

https://www.lawofficer.com/cbs-is-straight-up-libelous-as-they-tweet-rittenhouse-told-the-jury-he-murdered-two-men/

‘If you want to understand why no one trusts the press’: AG Hamilton looks at some headlines on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2021/11/08/if-you-want-to-understand-why-no-one-trust-the-press-ag-hamilton-looks-at-some-headlines-on-the-kyle-rittenhouse-trial/?utm_content=buffer1d76a&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&fbclid=IwAR2__2LeL5_UZLKhM33IkzOeLighr6pG6Joj0bh7geSw5q5acA-wJQOdi6g

Kyle Rittenhouse’s Mom Slams Joe Biden for Defaming Her Son: ‘He Did It for Votes'

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/11/12/kyle-rittenhouses-mom-slams-joe-biden-for-defaming-her-son-he-did-it-for-votes-n1532262

Look at all the proof that the communists are lying about Kyle. Why must we pretend that what's going on is anything other than lies?

Kyle Rittenhouse shooting a clear case of self-defense: Devine

https://nypost.com/2021/11/10/kyle-rittenhouse-shooting-a-clear-case-of-self-defense-devine/

you need to acknowledge that you're lying. I posted proof that you were lying

I don't think that's how it works.

Well that's how it works with grown ups honey. He posted a claim that was a flat out lie that Kyle illegally carried a firearm across state lines. I posted proof that this is not true. In fact, everything he's posting here are lies. he needs to acknowledge that he's lying. When people are bald faced lying and they are shown proof that what they're saying is wrong, they need to grow up and accept the truth. That is what is ridiculous about the Kyle case. People to this day call Kyle a 'white supremacist' because that's what joe biden called him even though it's not true. And some people don't even realize that everyone shot was a white person. And all this information has been readily avilbe for over a year, it's nothing new. the videos and all of it.

Kyle killed two people and severely wounded a third.

Why are you celebrating the killer?

Are you aware that there's a thing called the second amendment in the United States? Maybe you live in a different country. Anyway, in the US, the right to own a gun and prtect yourself from tyranny and bodily harm is partof the constitution. communists want people not to be able to defend themselves. It's really pretty insane that people here are making the argument that kyle was supposed to just sit there and let these child molesters murder him. Is that what you think that he should have done? Just sit there and allow the child molester to murder him? Would you just sit there and allow a child molester to murder you without putting up resistance?

This isn't a 2nd Amendment issue -- nor is there any justification for him to be there at all. He killed. He's a killer. There's no imaginary child molestor, no communist, no gun rights issue.

He killed two human beings and severely injured a third. Acknowledge the truth.

Wow. Three thumbs up within a minute of posting. Not bad.

you don't seem to understand reality. Kyle was there to protect the businesses that were being looted by antifa and black lives matter. People tried to murder him, and in self-defense he shot them. This was all shown on video evidence from multiple angles. On the witness stand the guy that survived admitted that he pointed a loaded gun at Kyle's head before Kyle shot him. HE ADMITED THAT. Rosenbaum was a convicted child molesting pedophile. That's a fact backed by publicly available court records and widely reported. The other two boys were antifa communists. The guy who got his bicep blown off was a convicted felon who was carrying a gun illegally. None of this is my opinion, these are all facts verified by witnesses, video evidence, and court records. You need to live in reality and acknowledge that you are 100% wrong

Advocating for vigilante justice only serves to prove your inability to focus on the facts at hand:

" The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel released a statement on Sept. 1 in which it explained why the newspaper had not reported on the victims’ past legal records. The statement read:

There is no evidence so far that the backgrounds of the three victims — Anthony Huber, Joseph Rosenbaum and Gaige Grosskreutz — had anything to do with the clashes that led to the deaths of Huber and Rosenbaum and the wounding of Grosskreutz.

They are the victims of a shooting, and as far as we can tell their past legal records have no bearing on them being shot during a protest.

If more facts emerge that show their backgrounds are relevant to what happened that night in Kenosha, we would revisit our decision. For instance, if there is evidence that any of the victims’ backgrounds could have affected their interactions with Rittenhouse, or if he knew anything about them before the shooting."

What is also true is that Kyle had no crowd control experience, no security guard experience nor no set training on how to actually protect physical property. He didn't have a weapons training course, he didn't have a medical background, not even a first aid kit with him.

He answered a blanket call for protect without being fully knowledgeable or prepared for the situation. He left his hometime with the full intention of breaking the city's curfew, walking around aimlessly looking for a fight.

Then he killed two people and seriously wounded a third.

That is reality. Please acknowledge you understand the concept.

You're an idiot.

VIDEO proof from MULTIPLE angles isn't sufficient?

When Kyle is proven innocent I expect an apology and an admission that you are wrong.

seems like that isn't real

This is little argument is fascinating... we are seeing the arguments from the two extremes. However, the arguments of neptune and ginger are irrelevant to the most serious charges.

For the murder charge, the defense is self-defense. The only question is whether at the moment this 17 year old kid legitimately felt in danger of losing his life.

That is why he will be acquitted. It's not that complicated.

Kyle killed two humans and severely wounded a third.

There's no apology that makes that fact go away.

Why do you think he might be acquitted?

Could it possibly be that MULTIPLE sources of direct evidence prove that he did nothing wrong? It's a Scooby Doo mystery as the kids say. I mean, I guess we could just disregard evidence that we all have the ability to see with our our own two eyes.