The Ahmaud Arbury Murder Trial

Can you prove this accusation?



Can you prove this accusation?



Accidents happen.

And that's why it's Negligent Manslaughter, not Aggravated Homicide.

It sounds like Oralloy is saying she deliberately intended to fire her gun.

He doesn't really get how debate works poor lad.

Potter found guilty of manslaughter
https://nypost.com/2021/12/23/kim-potter-guilty-of-manslaughter-in-daunte-wright-killing/

Expect police in minority areas to stop carrying tasers, and to simply open fire whenever they need to use force.

It won't be my problem. I don't live in a minority neighborhood.

No it doesn't.

Although that will now be a likely outcome in future cases, as police in minority areas will be relying more and more on gunfire as their only use of force.



The fact that no one can prove my claims wrong shows that my arguments can hold their own.

Accidents do not mean negligence.

Oralloy can continue losing his battle with the English Language without any input from me other than, "Go English!"

why do you hate justice so much?

In this case, yes, it really does.

"The charges:

First-degree manslaughter in this case means prosecutors alleged that Potter caused Wright's death while committing a misdemeanor — the "reckless handling or use of a firearm so as to endanger the safety of another with such force and violence that death or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable."

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleged that she caused his death "by her culpable negligence," meaning that Potter "caused an unreasonable risk and consciously took a chance of causing death or great bodily harm" to Wright, while using or possessing a firearm.

Neither charge required prosecutors to prove Potter intended to kill Wright, and they pointed that out to the jury during opening statements.

https://www.wdsu.com/article/kim-potter-charges-and-potential-penalties/38605362#

why do you keep propounding these racist posts and then denying it?

These false accusations of racism only make progressives look even sillier than they usually do.

I mean, I get that there is no way to defend progressivism with facts or logic, but that is no reason to make progressivism look even worse.

No it doesn't. You just like to lynch innocent people.

Don't whine when cops stop using tasers in minority neighborhoods. The risk of getting lynched over an honest mistake just isn't worth it. For the police it is far safer to avoid all less-lethal measures when dealing with minorities.

That you call refer to lynching innocent people as justice just proves that progressives are irredeemably evil.

You cannot show any language errors in any of my posts.

What is the point of always lying about people?

Instead of lying about me, how about condemning the lynching of this poor police officer?

I can't dumb down my response enough for you to understand.

My post was prompted by you failing to understand basic English.

I am not entertaining your delusions any longer.

Your racist advocacy of cops murdering minorities for any perceived infraction or interaction, mo matter how imaginary or minolr iit may be, is noted.

I keep telling you, these endless false accusations of racism only make progressives look even sillier than they usually do.

And no. Justified shootings by police officers are not murder.

The rise in the number of justified shootings of minorities is the fault of progressivism. The police are just trying to keep everyone safe.

Again you lie about me. There is nothing that I can't understand.



That's a lie. I suffered no such failure.



Another lie. You cannot point out anything untrue in my posts.

She was tried and convicted by a jury of her peers, not any different than being found not guilty for Kyle Rittenhouse.

Don't whine when the outcome isn't what you wanted. The law was applied evenly.