Doktor S wrote:Rights are arbitrary, I was suggesting a distinction based on reason
No, you are suggesting a distinction based on merit, based on earning it.
Your concept of rights has some folks 'worthy' and others not.
The American concept of rights, including the right to life cannot be based on your standard. It is arbitrary, as you admit.
Americans have stood for rights, not based on the whim of government but on the worth of the individual. We have fought (sometimes each other) , bled and died for rights based on a very different concept than what you espouse.
We'll stick with the Founders idea of rights, but there are plenty of totalitarian states around the world where your ideas would fit right in. Why don't you visit some of them?
Your view is not based on reason, but on the arbitrary use of power to kill or save alive based on your own personal whim. You'll be very popular in many countries of the world. Just not here.