1
   

saddest photo i have seen

 
 
Vivien
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:22 pm
I find it impossible to understand why he couldn't have helped

without the focussed. single track minded work of photographers like him the world wouldn't see these images though, to shock and make them think - a fine line to tread.

I couldn't do it - I feel the same about war photographers - some have done superb work but the ability to stand by as atrocities occur and photograph them? cold was the right word
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:31 pm
That picture makes me so sad....and the fact that that son of a bitch didn't run over there and take that little child into his arms makes me incredibly angry. He had every reason to be depressed after being such a f*cking a**hole.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:38 pm
boomerang wrote:
Millions and millions of people have seen this photo and done less than chasing a bird away.


That might be true boomerang, but he was at the scene. He could
have taken the picture, and picked up the child afterwards to help.

I doubt that there are many people, who would leave a starving
child next to them, and walk away. That was a most callous act.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:39 pm
It was heartless and cruel and cold and I can't even think about it.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:41 pm
I think that child was one of many many many many many.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:42 pm
ossobuco wrote:
I think that child was one of many many many many many.


I know and that is what makes it even sadder. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:44 pm
I agree osso..
but.. a few feet away?
A simple few steps?
Even in a group of thousands, that child was a few feet away..

I just cant excuse not helping that child in my mind.

Fact of the matter is , I WASNT THERE.. so I cant really say anything.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:49 pm
Gut instinct is to similarly condemn the man, but know nothing about the circumstances surrounding the incident, and, for all its poetic savagery, there are cold-hearted men and women in air-conditioned offices who have a lot more to do -- either through action or inaction -- with the surrounding tragedy than this guy did.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:54 pm
He was there in the first place, more than most. He had probably seen countless starving children and felt powerless, as he probably was - what did he have to give just one of the scattered thousands. He had his ability to document. I can understand his profound depression.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 12:58 pm
he had his ability to document, yes, and he did.
Those same arms and hands could have assisted that child to food.

Im stepping off this soap box.
I can understand the overwhelming feeling he must have had. I really can.
BUT- i wasnt there. I dont know what he was going through or what he had or had not done.
He suffered from depression? I think that may have been an understatement ...
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:12 pm
i just don't understand......
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:18 pm
More complicated, Dag, from this -

http://flatrock.org.nz/topics/odds_and_oddities/ultimate_in_unfair.htm
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:20 pm
It had been reported, early in this post that he had committed suicide.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:22 pm
more on the relief mess in those particular years -
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/sudan/SUDAWEB2-16.htm
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:25 pm
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:28 pm
Quote:
Friends said Mr Carter was a man of tumultuous emotions which brought passion to his work but also drove him to extremes of elation and depression. Last year, saying he needed a break from South Africa's turmoil, he paid his own way to the southern Sudan to photograph a civil war and famine that he felt the world was overlooking.

His picture of an emaciated girl collapsing on the way to a feeding centre, as a plump vulture lurked in the background, was published first in The New York Times and The Mail & Guardian, a Johannesburg weekly. The reaction to the picture was so strong that The New York Times published an unusual editor's note on the fate of the girl. Mr Carter said she resumed her trek to the feeding centre. He chased away the vulture.

Afterwards, he told an interviewer, he sat under a tree for a long time, "smoking cigarettes and crying". His father, Mr Jimmy Carter laid last night: "Kevin always carried around the horror of the work he did." - The New York Times





Quote:
Source: Sydney Morning Herald Saturday 30 July 1994



What are the odds the little girl is alive today? Not very high, I'd say. If she is alive, what quality of life is she likely to have? She almost certainly has permanent damage from her period of starvation during crucial development, both before and after birth. It is easy to criticise Kevin Carter. Why? Because he took a photo of one starving child among thousands? Let those who send all their spare cash to the needy cast the first stone...


Hmm...
ouch. Confused
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:30 pm
heeven,
you are so right it hurts.
0 Replies
 
bermbits
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:46 pm
A tumult of emotions here.

What I can say is wouldn't it be nice if there was a group of united nations that did more than think and talk about 'helping others less fortunate' (that quote taken from the Lions Club)? This international group of haves would actually help the have-nots. The current "united" nations is useless and a @!!#*!% joke!

I believe I read that so much of the aid and relief that was raised earlier never made it through because of corruption and the 'politics' of the region. I do not believe today is any different.

It takes such a picture and TV news coverage to get people to feel (fleetingly) and open their pocketbooks, but....
0 Replies
 
Vivien
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:49 pm
'let those who send all their spare cash to the needy cast the first stone'

yes

also the quote at the top of the article 'War doesn't determine who is right, war determines who is left'.

we can't know all the facts and without these images the hearts and minds of the world aren't touched - I do hope he did help her though - as Osso (?I think) said - one of many many many and such a daunting sickening sight - who to help?
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:51 pm
bermbits wrote:
wouldn't it be nice if there was a group of united nations that did more than think and talk about 'helping others less fortunate'? This international group of haves would actually help the have-nots. The current "united" nations is useless and a @!!#*!% joke!


Couldn't agree with you more on that!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/08/2024 at 06:05:10