1
   

present continuous

 
 
Reply Tue 19 Jul, 2005 02:24 am
Hi everybody, I want to make sure if the negative interrogative can also

be contracted like negative in present continuous. I guess it can be, here

isn't mentioned,

He is working / He's working.

Why is he working? / Why's he working ?

Is he not working? / Isn't he working ?


Another thing, for rules of the present continuous spelling. Let's take the

following examples,

Get : one syllable, one vowel, last letter is consonant. So, when using in

present con. it would be getting, doubling the last letter.

Prefer : two syllables, the second one has a vowel and ends up with

a consonant, so it would be preferring. But, if we take budget,

this verb can't be written budgetting because the stress lies on

the first syllable.

Could somebody tell me about signal spelling ?, and what is the exception

in American English ?


Also,

taking the example,

She is knitting, and she is singing. Now, we have one subject, so we

might drop the second one,

She is knittig, and singing. Does this mean that the first sentence is

awkward ?, or it's fine.

Thanks everybody :wink:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 768 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Jul, 2005 09:31 am
Quote:
He is working / He's working.

Why is he working? / Why's he working ?

Is he not working? / Isn't he working ?


Yeah, these are all acceptable contractions. However, the last one changes things ever so slightly. If you say "Isn't he working?" most people will answer as if you said, "Is he working?" But grammatically, they're equivalent.

Quote:
Another thing, for rules of the present continuous spelling. Could somebody tell me about signal spelling ?, and what is the exception

in American English ?


Never knew about this rule...but I'm not surprised that it is not hard and fast! English is just not consistent enough to define all these exceptions with easy to remember rules. You'll just have to try to remember each word.

Quote:
She is knitting, and she is singing. Now, we have one subject, so we

might drop the second one,

She is knittig, and singing. Does this mean that the first sentence is

awkward ?, or it's fine.


There's no need for a comma in this sentence, so that makes it a little awkward. The top sentence is also awkward because you repeated the pronoun "she" twice which was unnecessary. Therefore, the second sentence is more acceptable.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » present continuous
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 01:33:38