9
   

Security Officials Blame Poor Intel for Failure to Blunt Capitol Attack

 
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Fri 5 Mar, 2021 09:26 am
Quote:
Officers maced, trampled: Docs expose depth of Jan. 6 chaos

Two firefighters loaned to Washington for the day were the only medics on the Capitol steps Jan. 6, trying to triage injured officers as they watched the angry mob swell and attack police working to protect Congress.

Law enforcement agents were “being pulled into the crowd and trampled, assaulted with scaffolding materials, and/or bear maced by protesters,” wrote Arlington County firefighter Taylor Blunt in an after-action memo. Some couldn’t walk, and had to be dragged to safety.

Even the attackers sought medical help, and Blunt and his colleague Nathan Waterfall treated those who were passing out or had been hit. But some “feigned illness to remain behind police lines,” Blunt wrote.

The memo is one of hundreds of emails, texts, photos and documents obtained by The Associated Press. Taken together, the materials shed new light on the sprawling patchwork of law enforcement agencies that tried to stop the siege and the lack of coordination and inadequate planning that stymied their efforts.

The AP obtained the materials through 35 Freedom of Information Act requests to law enforcement agencies that responded to the Capitol insurrection.

“We were among the first mutual aid teams to arrive and were critical to begin the process of driving protestors off the Capitol,” wrote Blunt.

Five people died in the attack, including a police officer. Two other officers killed themselves after. There were hundreds of injuries and more than 300 people, including members of extremist groups Proud Boys and Oathkeepers, have been charged with federal crimes. Federal agents are still investigating and hundreds more suspects are at large. Justice Department officials have said they may charge some with sedition.

The Arlington firefighters ended up at the Capitol because, two days earlier, Washington Metro Police Chief Robert J. Contee had formally asked the Arlington County Police Department, along with police departments from Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland, and Arlington County in Virginia, to lend them some officers trained for protests and riots, according to the documents.

Arlington’s acting police chief Andy Penn said they’d send help for the “planned and unplanned first amendment activities,” according to emails.

At the time, the Capitol Police department had issued a security assessment warning that militia members, white supremacists and other extremists were heading to Washington to target Congress in what they saw as a “last stand” to support President Donald Trump.

Federal agencies not responding were also preparing for potential violence. On Jan. 4, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said staff should try to telework for the week.

Two days later, it was 3:39 p.m. when Penn emailed county officials that he had “just been notified” that Arlington officers were responding to the Capitol attack and had been absorbed into the overall response led by Capitol Police.

That was almost 90 minutes after the mob first busted into the Capitol and more than an hour after the medics began treating injured police on the steps.

Members of Congress, who were locked down or rushed to safety that day as the attackers approached the House and Senate chambers, are holding hearings this week to get to the bottom of what went wrong with the law enforcement response that allowed the crowd to enter and ransack the Capitol building.

One question they are looking to answer is why the Capitol Police didn’t have more help on hand early in the day, before the rally near the White House devolved into insurrection at the Capitol.

The emails obtained by AP — hastily written and including misspellings and incomplete sentences — show that nearby police agencies were alerted two days earlier that there might be trouble and were prepared to help.

The night before the breach, after hours of rallies and speeches across the city, Federal Protective Service officers, who protect federal property, had noticed protesters trying to camp out on federal property and were “being vigilant for any suspicious activity," according to an email from the agency.

They were expecting large crowds, and by the next morning they were monitoring them closely.

At 9:45 a.m. a protective service liaison to the Capitol Police wrote, “Good morning Sir, what I have is the Ellipse is permitted for 30k but they expecting for there to be much more. Freedom Plaza original permit was 5k and it was raised to 30k, the permit outside Sylven Theater is permitted for 15K.”

The agents were particularly interested in the right wing extremist group, Proud Boys. They noted how many were in Washington, that they were staying at a downtown hotel, and what they planned.

In a briefing at noon on that day, just as Trump was encouraging supporters to “ fight like hell,” a Federal Protective Service email said about 300 Proud Boys were at the U.S. Capitol.

“No incidents at this time,” the email said. But then it warned, “The Proud Boys are threatening to shut down the water system in the downtown area, which includes government facilities.”

The email noted there was a man in a tree with what appeared to be a rifle near the Ellipse, and about 25,000 people were around the White House, including some who were hiding bags in bushes outside the building.

“Together we stand!” the officer signed off.

About 20 minutes later, a protective service officer whose name was redacted sent an email that read, “POTUS is encouraging the protesters to march to capitol grounds and continue protesting there.” POTUS stands for president of the United States.

In a series of emails that followed, protective service officers messages offered a blow-by-blow account of the march to the Capitol from the rally where Trump spoke.

"Protesters moving towards the capitol down Pennsylvania, Constitution and Madison in numbers estimated 10-15,000," read an email sent at 12:28 p.m.

The officers tracked them across the city and at 12:57 p.m. a message read, “Large group just breached the USCP barricade on the West Front,” referring to the Capitol Police barriers on west side of the Capitol Building.

About a half hour later, they reported several police officers were injured, and then at 2:14 a message screamed “CAPITOL HAS BEEN BREACHED. PROTESTERS ARE NOW INSIDE THE CAPITOL.” Two minutes later they reported the House and Senate chambers were being locked down.

“Shots fired 2nd floor house side inside the capitol,” read a message at 2:45, probably the moment when a Capitol Police officer fatally shot Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter who tried to hurl herself through a broken interior window into the Speaker's Lobby just outside the House chamber where lawmakers were taking cover.

Intelligence agents used Facebook to monitor dozens of protests planned for Jan. 6 and beyond, according to emails. These rallies had names such as the “Yugest Trump Parade of All (45 Exclamation Points)!,” “Fight for President Trump and Your Rights,” and “Wild Protest for Donald Trump (The Republican Mandate).” Some events were permitted, others were not.

Officers in the Virginia suburb of Vienna were already on edge two days before the Capitol breach after a video of a small, half-hour protest at the home of Republican Sen. Josh Hawley __ a Trump supporter __ attracted more than 100,000 pageviews.

“They claim they are coming back tonight,” Vienna Deputy Chief Daniel Janickey said in Jan. 5 emails to Fairfax County officials.

“WE will have some officers out there tonight monitoring in case (the) group shows up,” Janickey wrote. “Hawley and his staff have hired armed private security for (the) next 48 hours.”

Those protesters didn’t return. But within 24 hours, Fairfax County, Virginia, officials realized their Washington counterparts had much more trouble on their hands.

At 3:10 p.m. on Jan. 6, Fairfax County’s deputy county executive, Dave Rohrer, emailed more than 25 county officials: “Subject: Awareness - Police Mutual Aid Request U.S. Capitol Police."

That was about two hours after the first windows had been broken.

The U.S. Capitol had been breached, he said.

“It is obvious to me based on my experience and knowledge that an emergency exists,” said Rohrer. He said he had authorized the Fairfax County Police Department to send Civil Disturbance Unit officers and commanders “to assist gaining control for safety reasons.”

He added that they were monitoring the deployment closely. The redacted email refers to an early June episode when police from several jurisdictions used tear gas to violently break up a peaceful and legal protest in Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House.

On Jan. 6, Rohrer said he reminded commanders on the scene “that they are to cease operations if at any point they determine they are being used in an inappropriate, unethical, illegal manner, or are not under a competent authority... Maintaining life safety, regaining and establishing a safe perimeter, etc., should be the initial focus.”

Just 12 minutes later, Rohrer had an update: They were suspending any fire, rescue or emergency service transportation to hospitals in the District of Columbia and “upgrading response and command structure.”

For hours, Fairfax County’s police monitored Metro stations and acted as back up to Washington police, according to the emails. They were also checking with hotels where some in the mob were staying. Rohrer noted that many had been staying in Alexandria and Arlington..

The hotels “reported some problems with crowds and disorderly conduct the past few nights,” he said.

That evening, at 8:31 p.m., a Federal Protective Service memo alerted “there is a report of an armed militia group headed to dc from west Virginia. Query ongoing.”

As midnight approached, Rohrer emailed again. Although the Capitol was quiet, “Intel will be monitored throughout the night and, unfortunately, PD and US Capitol Police are investigating several threats targeting residences of Capitol VIPs or family members received late tonight.”

By Jan. 7, Fairfax County Police Department Major Shawn Bennett was bristling at former Capitol Police Chief Terry Gainer’s critique of the police response.

“Gainer throws a lot of shame but he doesn’t offer any answers to what ‘specifically’ he would have done differently to keep the initial group from breaking down the barriers,” emailed Bennett.

Also on Jan. 7, Fairfax County Executive Bryan Hill was thanking his staff.

“Our Police Department’s Civil Disturbance Unit answered the call yesterday, and as much as I hated to activate you, it was an activation to preserve our republic,” he wrote. “I am hopeful we will never again see what we witnessed yesterday, but I am most hopeful that yesterday’s events will galvanize our county and our nation as we do our best to vaccinate, maintain calm and create a sense of unity.”


AP
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Fri 5 Mar, 2021 09:44 am
Trump may have delayed sending National Guard to Capitol riot to serve his political narrative, former FBI agent says

Quote:
A former FBI agent alleged that Donald Trump intentionally stopped the National Guard from mobilising to respond to the Capitol insurrection in January.

Asha Rangappa, the former FBI agent and regular CNN commentator, said Mr Trump hobbled the National Guard response to the riot to serve his political goals.

During her interview, CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin asked Ms Rangappa if Mr Trump's decision to stave off the National Guard was for the sake of optics.

"Is that even in the realm of possibility that optics could be a reason?" Ms Baldwin said.

"I think with the prior administration, it absolutely could have been in the realm of possibly, and that's a problem," Ms Rangappa said.

"So let just go back to what we mean by optics. The narrative that was pushed by the former president was that the existential threat to the republic was Antifa as manifested in these Black Lives Matter protests, and which warranted this heavy military and law enforcement presence which we saw in DC and elsewhere. So when they are concerned about optics, what I think they are suggesting is that they did not want a similar presence for the people who were coming to the Capitol in support of the president, because what would that say? That would suggest that they are as dangerous as the other threat that they have been hyping up for some time."

Ms Rangappa theorised that Mr Trump did not want images of police beating his supporters because it would resemble the footage of police beating Black Lives Matter and Antifa members over the summer.

"So optics, to me, means is that he (was) deliberately mitigating the threat and the perception of the threat, I think, in service of this greater narrative of where the danger really is," she said.

Ms Rangappa's comments come in the wake of testimony made to Congress by DC National Guard commanding general William Walker.

Mr Walker said he was "stunned" that the Pentagon officials from the Trump administration refused to send reinforcements to the Capitol for more than three hours, citing the "optics."

On the day of the insurrection, senior Department of Defense officials Charles Flynn and Walter Piatt advised military commanders that "it would not be their best military advice to have uniformed guardsmen on the Capitol," pointing to the optics and the fear that deploying the National Guard might inflame the rioters.

Mr Walker said that the National Guard was given immediate approval to respond to Black Lives Matter and George Floyd protests last summer.

(...)
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  5  
Reply Sun 7 Mar, 2021 06:55 am
F.B.I. Finds Contact Between Proud Boys Member and Trump Associate Before Riot

0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Tue 9 Mar, 2021 10:27 am
Quote:
Don’t Let QAnon Bully Congress

Last Thursday was not Donald Trump’s triumphant return to power after all.

While this won’t surprise most people, it likely came as a shock to many QAnon followers. According to that movement’s expediently evolving lore, March 4 — the date on which U.S. presidents were inaugurated until the mid-1930s — was when Mr. Trump was to reclaim the presidency and resume his epic battle against Satan-worshiping, baby-eating Democrats and deep-state monsters.

This drivel is absurd. It is also alarming. Violent extremists, obsessed with the symbolism of March 4, were for weeks nattering about a possible attack on Congress, according to law enforcement officials.

On March 2, the F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security issued a joint intelligence bulletin to law enforcement agencies, warning that militia extremists might be plotting to overrun the Capitol complex and “remove Democratic lawmakers.” The details of the possible plot were hazy, but the threat unnerved enough people that House leaders canceled Thursday’s session. The voting schedule was condensed, and lawmakers left town early for the weekend.

Although March 4 came and went without a bloody coup attempt — that is, without another bloody coup attempt — damage was still done. Lawmakers abandoned their workplace out of fear of politically motivated violence. This not only disrupted the people’s business. It also sent a dangerous signal that Congress can be intimidated — that the state of American government is fragile.

Of course the safety of lawmakers and other Capitol Hill workers must be a priority. But allowing the government to be held hostage by political extremists is unacceptable.

The current security threat is not expected to dissipate any time soon. If anything, the intelligence community has cautioned that the Jan. 6 siege of the Capitol may have emboldened extremists. Having sacked the Capitol, the lunatic fringe is now dreaming of a bigger, bloodier encore.

March 4 was just one target. The acting chief of the Capitol Police, Yogananda Pittman, recently warned that extremists have been talking about possibly blowing up the Capitol during President Biden’s first address to a joint meeting of Congress, which has not yet been scheduled, with an eye toward killing “as many members as possible.”

Also in discussion around the QAnon water cooler is that Mr. Trump will be reinstalled on March 20, with the help of the U.S. military. Indeed, the F.B.I. and Homeland Security bulletin cited an increased risk from violent domestic extremists for all of 2021.

In the wake of Jan. 6, enhanced protections were put in place around Capitol Hill. There is an increased police presence along with thousands of National Guard troops. Last week, Chief Pittman requested that the Guard presence, originally set to expire Friday, be extended 60 days. (The Pentagon has yet to issue a final decision.) Inside the Capitol building, additional metal detectors have been installed. The grounds are ringed by security fencing. Lawmakers from both parties have complained that “the people’s house” now has the grim vibe of an armed camp — or a low-security prison.

But these safeguards failed to keep the House operating in the face of last week’s threat, despite it being somewhat nebulous. Law enforcement officials emphasized that the extremists’ chatter about March 4 was nowhere near as intense or detailed as that surrounding the Jan. 6 attack. Some officials characterized the threat as “aspirational.” The Senate, notably, opted to stick around and keep working on the Covid relief bill.

A longer-term, more sustainable approach is clearly needed.

On Monday, lawmakers were briefed on the findings of the security assessment that the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, requested in the wake of Jan. 6. Russel Honoré, a retired Army lieutenant general who led the task force, recommended a variety of permanent enhancements. These include beefing up the Capitol Police force, in terms of increased staffing, improved training, enhanced authority for its leadership and a new emphasis on intelligence work; creating a quick-reaction force to be on call 24-7 to handle imminent threats; installing a retractable fencing system; and adding protections for rank-and-file members of Congress at home and while they are traveling and back in their districts.

Congress can now start haggling over which measures to adopt. Don’t look for the process to be silky smooth. Republicans, many of them desperate to downplay the Jan. 6 tragedy, are already attacking General Honoré as biased. The general has not been shy about criticizing lawmakers and others he regards as having fed the postelection chaos, and he has suggested that some Capitol Police officers may have been complicit in allowing rioters into the building.

Representative Matt Gaetz, the Florida delegation’s mini-Trump, is in full froth. “Pelosi hired a bigot to hunt MAGA,” he charged last month. Last Tuesday, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to the speaker, arguing that General Honoré’s criticism of the police and lawmakers was “disqualifying.” On Thursday, Tucker Carlson told viewers: “Honoré is an unhinged partisan extremist. He’s nuttier than anyone affiliated with QAnon.”

Trump toadies should not be allowed to turn this issue into a partisan game. Steps must be taken to safeguard the seat of government. Going forward, lawmakers cannot be seen as bowing to political thugs, their work upended whenever there is a semi-credible threat. That is not the American way.


nyt
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2021 10:07 am
I know the following don't have any direct link to my title but, in a round about way, it is all connected with the our current political climate culture.

Journalist arrested while covering protests acquitted in Iowa case seen as attack on press

Quote:
An Iowa jury on Wednesday acquitted a journalist who was pepper-sprayed and arrested by police while covering a protest, in a case that critics have derided as an attack on press freedoms and an abuse of prosecutorial discretion.


After deliberating for less than two hours, the jury found Des Moines Register reporter Andrea Sahouri and her ex-boyfriend Spenser Robnett not guilty on misdemeanor charges of failure to disperse and interference with official acts.

The Des Moines verdict is an embarrassing outcome for the office of Polk County Attorney John Sarcone, which pursued the charges despite widespread condemnation from advocates for a free press and human rights.
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Sun 14 Mar, 2021 08:50 am
Police Shrugged Off the Proud Boys, Until They Attacked the Capitol

A protester was burning an American flag outside the 2016 Republican convention in Cleveland when Joseph Biggs rushed to attack. Jumping a police line, he ripped the man’s shirt off and “started pounding,” he boasted that night in an online video.

But the local police charged the flag burner with assaulting Mr. Biggs. The city later paid $225,000 to settle accusations that the police had falsified their reports out of sympathy with Mr. Biggs, who went on to become a leader of the far-right Proud Boys.

Two years later, in Portland, Ore., something similar occurred. A Proud Boy named Ethan Nordean was caught on video pushing his way through a crowd of counterprotesters, punching one of them, then slamming him to the ground, unconscious. Once again, the police charged only the other man in the skirmish, accusing him of swinging a baton at Mr. Nordean.

Now, Mr. Biggs, 37, and Mr. Nordean, 30, are major targets in a federal investigation that prosecutors on Thursday said could be “one of the largest in American history.” They face some of the most serious charges stemming from the attack on the U.S. Capitol in January: leading a mob of about 100 Proud Boys in a coordinated plan to disrupt the certification of President Donald J. Trump’s electoral defeat.

But an examination of the two men’s histories shows that local and federal law enforcement agencies passed up several opportunities to take action against them and their fellow Proud Boys long before they breached the Capitol.

The group’s propensity for violence and extremism was no secret. But the F.B.I. and other agencies had often seen the Proud Boys as they chose to portray themselves, according to more than a half-dozen current and former federal officials: as mere street brawlers who lacked the organization or ambition of typical bureau targets like neo-Nazis, international terrorists and Mexican drug cartels.

“There was a sense that, yes, their ideology is of concern, and, yes, they are known to have committed acts of violence that would be by definition terrorism, but we don’t worry about them,” said Elizabeth Neumann, an assistant secretary for threat prevention in the Department of Homeland Security who left last year. “The Proud Boys are just the guys-that-drink-too much-after-the-football-game-and-tend-to-get-into-bar-fights type of people — people that never looked organized enough to cause serious national security threats.”

Although law enforcements agencies cannot investigate political groups without reasonable suspicion of a crime, some former officials said they were surprised by the Proud Boys’ apparent impunity.

“They committed violence in public, used videos of that violence to promote themselves for other rallies and then traveled across the country to engage in violence again,” said Mike German, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University and a former F.B.I. agent who worked undercover among right-wing groups. “How that didn’t attract F.B.I. attention is hard for me to understand.”

Local police officers have appeared at times to side with the Proud Boys, especially when they have squared off against leftists openly critical of law enforcement. Some local officials have complained that without guidance from federal agencies, their police departments were ill equipped to understand the dangers of a national movement like the group.

“It has largely been left to the locals to sort things out for themselves,” said Mitchell Silber, the former director of intelligence analysis at the New York Police Department.

To pre-empt violence by other far-right groups, federal authorities have often used a tactic known as the “knock and talk.” Agents call or confront group members to warn them away from demonstrations, sometimes reviving past criminal offenses as leverage.

Christopher Wray, the F.B.I. director, told a Senate committee this month that agents had done that in the run-up to a pro-Trump rally in Washington on Jan. 6 that preceded the Capitol assault. They contacted “a handful” of people already under criminal inquiry to discourage attendance, he said.

Enrique Tarrio, the chairman of the Proud Boys, said that federal agents had called or visited him on eight or so occasions before rallies in recent years. But it was never to pressure him to stay away.

Instead, he said in an interview, the agents asked for march routes and other plans in order to separate the Proud Boys from counterprotesters. Other times, he said, agents warned that they had picked up potential threats from the left against him or his associates.

But before the Jan. 6 event, no one contacted the leaders of the Proud Boys, Mr. Tarrio said, even though their gatherings at previous Trump rallies in Washington had been marred by serious violence.

“They did not reach out to us,” he said.

‘Disavow, Disavow, Disavow’
In summer 2017, neo-Nazis, Klansmen and other white supremacists gathered in Charlottesville, Va., to announce their resurgence at the “Unite the Right” rally. Its organizer, Jason Kessler, was a member of the Proud Boys.

The group had been founded a year earlier by Gavin McInnes, now 50, the co-creator of the media outlet Vice. (The company has long since severed all ties.) He was a Canadian turned New Yorker with a record of statements attacking feminists and Muslims, and he often expressed a half-ironic appetite for mayhem. “Can you call for violence generally?” he once asked in an online video. “’Cause I am.”

The Proud Boys had been volunteering as body guards for right-wing firebrands like Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos and frequently clashed with left-wing crowds, especially at college campuses. Proud Boys “free speech” rallies in bastions of the left like Seattle, Portland or Berkeley, Calif., routinely ended in street fights.

Yet Mr. McInnes shunned the Unite the Right gathering, saying in an online video: “Disavow, disavow, disavow.” By his account, the Proud Boys were not white supremacists but merely “Western chauvinists.” That stance helped the Proud Boys evade scrutiny from federal law enforcement.

The rally turned violent — a participant drove his car into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing one and injuring more than a dozen — setting off a broad repudiation of the groups that attended.

Despite Mr. McInnes’s cautions, several prominent Proud Boys attended, including Mr. Tarrio, the current chairman, who was photographed blowing kisses to a crowd of counterprotesters. But members cite his role to argue that the Proud Boys are not racially exclusive: Mr. Tarrio’s background is Afro-Cuban, making him one of the rare nonwhite faces in the group.

The group, whose total membership is unknown but believed to be in the thousands, has never articulated a specific ideology or dogma. Its rallies, though, feature hyper-nationalist chants about immigration, Islam and Mr. Trump. Its members have lionized Augusto Pinochet, the Chilean dictator, and their events often appear to be thinly disguised pretexts to bait opponents into confrontations.

Indeed, the Proud Boys have made little effort to hide violent intentions. In fall 2018, for example, members of a New England chapter posted notes on the online service Venmo as they paid their monthly dues and transportation costs to an October “Resist Marxism” rally in Providence, R.I.

The event would quickly degenerate into brawls, just what some of the Proud Boys had anticipated.

“October blood money and bus,” one wrote with his payment.

“Right wing atrocities,” wrote another.

“Helicopter fuel. Those filthy commies are not going to push themselves out of helicopters,” quipped a third, alluding to Pinochet’s practice of executing dissidents by dropping them from the air.

The payments even revealed that one member of that chapter was a police officer: Kevin P. Wilcox of East Hampton, Conn. (He did not post violent messages.)

After a complaint from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the police department said the officer’s affiliation with the Proud Boys did not violate its policies, in part because it was not considered a white supremacist group. Officer Wilcox, now retired, could not be reached for comment.

“We tried to bring attention to the Proud Boys’ violence back then,” said Megan Squire, a computer scientist at Elon University who documented the Venmo transactions. “Nobody listened.”

Career officials in federal enforcement have complained that the Trump administration sought to divert investigative resources toward poorly defined threats from the left, such as the movement of violence-prone activists known as antifa.

Despite those distractions, the officials note, federal agents worked undercover for months last year to arrest members of a secretive neo-Nazi group, the Base. Prosecutors have accused members of the Base of detailed plots to murder a married couple for supporting antifa and to inject violence into a gun rally in Virginia, all with the aim of triggering a racial civil war.

The F.B.I. later broke up a group of militiamen accused of planning to kidnap Michigan’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer. An informant recorded them conspiring during an armed intrusion into the Michigan statehouse to protest Covid 19 stay-at-home orders.

Unlike with those groups, federal law enforcement officials said, no evidence emerged that the Proud Boys had plotted murders, kidnappings, gun crimes or — apart from Jan. 6 — insurrection.

Yet the Proud Boys’ belligerence fit the definition of terrorism, other officials said: unlawful violence and intimidation for political aims. Members raised money to travel across state lines to dozens of rallies with the intent of street fighting, at least once explicitly targeting a Muslim community in upstate New York for harassment — activities that could have justified the scrutiny of federal law enforcement.

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment on the group.

Some former officials said that the failure to recognize the threat of Proud Boys was a blind spot in the culture of law enforcement that transcended the Trump administration. “If the Proud Boys was not a white male chauvinist club but a Black male chauvinist club, I think that, sadly, we would have seen a different policing posture,” said Ms. Neumann, the former Homeland Security official.

Municipal police, without federal guidance, took a piecemeal approach, occasionally arresting Proud Boys for egregious violence but more often simply shooing the gang along.

About a week after the October 2018 clashes in Providence, members of the group set upon protesters outside a speech Mr. McInnes was giving at the Metropolitan Republican Club in Manhattan. Two of the Proud Boys were eventually convicted of assault and sentenced to four years in prison.

Critics argued that such arrests were rare because police generally favored the Proud Boys over their left-leaning opponents. Mr. McInnes apparently agreed.

“I have a lot of support in the N.Y.P.D.,” he said, without evidence, in an online video shortly after the arrests, “and I very much appreciate that.”

After a Philadelphia rally by Vice President Mike Pence last year, officers at a members-only police union bar mingled inside with about 10 Proud Boys wearing their distinctive regalia. When members of the group confronted journalists who were lingering outside, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, the police asked the Proud Boys if they were OK.

‘A Very Soft Civil War’
Mr. Nordean became one of the group’s marquee stars, mainly through a viral video of his 2018 knockout punch in Portland.

An amateur body builder who had once trained to be a Navy SEAL, Mr. Nordean was working at his family’s chowder restaurant near Seattle when he first encountered the Proud Boys in 2017, during a scuffle in the city with immigrant-rights demonstrators.

He quickly began to see Proud Boys street fights as part of a much loftier contest.

“You start to kind of develop this feeling that these people are no longer Americans per se but they are kind of anti-American,” Mr. Nordean later told the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on his Infowars program, calling the struggle “a very soft civil war.”

Mr. Nordean adopted the nom de guerre “Rufio Panman,” after a character in the Peter Pan movie “Hook.” About the same time, he went into business with a local police officer, Trevor Davidson, selling fitness supplements. (Although there is no evidence that he aided the Proud Boys, the Renton Police Department is investigating how much the officer knew of Mr. Nordean’s involvement.)

In June 2018, Mr. Nordean went to Portland, where the Proud Boys had repeatedly clashed with local leftists. After a so-called Freedom and Courage rally at a federal building, dozens of members marched around the block to confront waiting counterprotesters.

Video footage showed Mr. Nordean shoving one to the ground before another, David Busby, approached with a metal baton.

By then a street-fighting veteran, Mr. Nordean had put shin guards on his forearms to prepare for combat. Deflecting the baton with one arm, he delivered a right hook to Mr. Busby’s jaw that knocked him unconscious, then threw the man to the ground. Mr. Busby was hospitalized with a “significant concussion,” a police report noted.

Proud Boys websites replayed the video incessantly, calling it “the punch heard ’round the world.”

“I just love how you giant-roundhouse-right-hook and then shove him down so his head hits the pavement — that probably hurt him worse!” Mr. Jones exulted in an interview with Mr. Nordean, adding, “It’s so exciting!”

On six Facebook pages the group uses to vet new recruits, the number of prospective members jumped more than 70 percent over the next 30 days, adding more than 820 potential Proud Boys, said Cassie Miller, a researcher at the Southern Poverty Law Center. The number of active chapters around the country exploded, increasing from three in 2017 to about 44 by the end of 2018, according to a count by the center.

Two other Proud Boys were arrested that day for violence during previous clashes. But Mr. Nordean was not. He “claimed he exercised his right to defend himself and others,” the police report noted. The department declined to comment, as did Mr. Nordean’s lawyer.

Mr. Nordean said on Infowars that he could tell the Portland police despised the counterprotesters but left the fighting to the Proud Boys. The police, he added, were caught “in between doing what’s right and getting in trouble” because they were “entangled in a whole bunch of politically correct things.”

The ‘Thin Blue Line’
Mr. Biggs, the future Proud Boys leader who attacked the flag burner in Cleveland, was a barrel-chested Army veteran who had served in Afghanistan and Iraq. He got his start on the far right working as an Infowars correspondent, which is how he encountered Mr. Nordean and the Proud Boys.

Mr. Biggs’s record of violence predated his affiliation with the group. He was arrested in North Carolina on a domestic violence charge in 2007; prosecutors dropped the case after his wife failed to appear as a witness. He was convicted of resisting arrest in South Carolina in 2012 and sentenced to probation. And he was arrested in early 2016, accused of assaulting a security officer outside his apartment in Austin, Texas.

He boasted on Infowars that the Texas episode was a struggle against tyranny, but his account raised questions. He and a girlfriend had come home “tipsy” after drinking shots with a friend, he said, and he angrily refused a security guard’s instructions to keep the noise down and to go inside. The two men fought until the police arrived. But a grand jury declined to bring charges.

A few weeks later, Mr. Biggs was at the Republican convention in Cleveland as a correspondent for Infowars when he attacked the flag burner, Gregory Johnson, now 64.

A member of the Communist Party, he had been the plaintiff in the landmark 1989 Supreme Court case Johnson v. Texas, which established that the First Amendment protected flag burning.

Although video recordings indicated that Mr. Biggs started the melee by pummeling Mr. Johnson, a police officer said in an affidavit that Mr. Johnson “caused two media members to get burned by the fire” — Mr. Biggs and an Infowars colleague.

“He is a fascist,” Mr. Johnson said of Mr. Biggs in an interview.

A lawyer for Mr. Biggs declined to comment.

The Trump adviser Roger J. Stone Jr., an a Infowars regular, introduced Mr. Biggs to Mr. Tarrio, the Proud Boys chairman, and by 2019 he had started helping him organize events.

There was another flag-burning incident. On July 4, 2019, Mr. Biggs helped lead a Proud Boys rally in front of the White House to protest a demonstration by Mr. Johnson and fellow Communist Party members.

The Proud Boys attacked the flag burners, but the Metropolitan Police Department instead arrested two of the Communists, on assault and other charges. The police then escorted the Proud Boys to a nearby bar. Several officers were captured on video exchanging fist bumps with one of the them. Department officials said they found “insufficient facts” to identify any policy violation.

A month later, in August, Mr. Biggs helped organize an “End Domestic Terrorism” rally in Portland. He posted a series of social media messages threatening leftist counterprotesters, including photos of him wielding a huge spiked baseball bat emblazoned with Mr. Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again.”

F.B.I. agents pulled Mr. Biggs and Mr. Tarrio aside at the Portland airport but did not ask them to tone down the posts or stay away from the rally, the Proud Boys chairman recalled.

Instead, he explained, the agents warned the two Proud Boys of threats against them from antifa activists. (The Portland police separated the antagonists, avoiding major violence.)

At the end of the year, as Mr. Trump was trying to overturn his election loss, Mr. Biggs and Mr. Tarrio marched at the head of hundreds of Proud Boys during a pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally in Washington. That night, members stole a Black Lives Matter banner and burned it in the street.

In video footage, Mr. Biggs urged the crowd of Proud Boys to celebrate by drinking. As he led them to a bar, he chanted, “I like beer!” — a Proud Boys inside joke alluding to testimony by Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation.

Mr. Biggs’s mood changed after a tumultuous night of street clashes. Two Proud Boys were stabbed, and he grew angry at the police for failing to more actively defend the Proud Boys.

“We are the ones that back you!” he yelled through a megaphone at a phalanx of riot officers. “That thin blue line is getting thinner and thinner.”

The Washington police arrested Mr. Tarrio on Jan. 4, questioning him about the banner burning and charging him with illegal possession of two high-capacity magazines for an AR-15 (each stamped with the Proud Boys rooster logo). But the authorities released him on condition he stay out of the District of Columbia during the Trump rally two days later. No other Proud Boys were arrested in connection with the incident.

‘Want Your House Back? Take It’
The Proud Boys made no effort to hide their anticipation of political violence in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6. “If there ever was a time for there to be a second civil war, it’s now,” Mr. Biggs wrote in a blog post shortly after the election. “Buy ammo, clean your guns, get storable food and water.” In December, he helped spread the word on social media that when the Proud Boys showed up in Washington, they should do so not in their customary black-and-yellow polo shirts but “incognito.”

Mr. Nordean, meanwhile, used social media to solicit donations for “protective gear” and “communications equipment,” court papers say. After Mr. Tarrio was expelled from Washington, according to prosecutors, the Proud Boys tapped Mr. Nordean to assume “war powers” and lead them at the Capitol. (It is unclear exactly what “war powers” referred to.)

The 100-strong mob behind Mr. Biggs and Mr. Nordean was almost certainly the single largest organized group that took part in the attack, and prosecutors said its members spearheaded the violence. One Proud Boy, Dominic Pezzola, armed with a riot shield he had stolen from the police, was among the first to shatter a window and break into the Capitol, court papers say.

“Do you want your house back? Take it!” urged another Proud Boy, William Chrestman, clad in military gear and wielding an ax handle.

Federal agents have now executed search warrants on Proud Boys in four states, scoured members’ social media accounts and dug into their private communications. Prosecutors have so far accused 10 members of crimes including destruction of government property and threatening a federal officer. They are now seeking to link as many as possible in an overarching conspiracy indictment.

Agents came for Mr. Biggs on Inauguration Day, arresting him in Florida only hours before President Biden was sworn in.

When agents came for Mr. Nordean two weeks later, court papers say, they raided his home in the Seattle suburbs with assault rifles and flash-bang grenades.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Sun 14 Mar, 2021 08:59 am
@revelette3,
I think for a long time they were seen as one of their own, they waved the flag and appeared patriotic. The problem is that their version of America is completely at odds with a democracy, and all the talk of violent protests have born fruit.

From the outside it’s easy to see how it happened, but that doesn’t seem quite so clear inside Republican circles.
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Sun 14 Mar, 2021 09:59 am
@izzythepush,
As sad as I am to come to see, I think the reason they see the proud boys and the like as one of their own is because quite often, they were at one time, maybe even at the same time. (not retired) I have been shocked to read of late how many of the capitol riot weren't poor country hicks blowing off steam but active productive members of society.

Another aspect of this which upsets me is how these violent right wing groups got overlooked in the media last summer when the George Floyd summer fires were happening. I mean the likes of proud boys were there as well, purposely aggravating fights and making destruction of their own. Yet in talks about it in local communities so to speak, the whole thing got blamed on BLM and Antifa when the violent right wing extremist were as much to blame as any of the BLM protestors who used violence as a means of protest. All of those on any side were wrong to use violence as a means of protest, particularly, in my opinion, BLM as BLM is a good group fighting for a just cause and violence takes away the good ground they are trying/or have gain(ed).
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2021 10:03 am
Andrea Sahouri on her BLM protest arrest: 'I was the only journalist of color and the only journalist arrested'
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2021 12:58 pm
@revelette3,
revelette3 wrote:
BLM is a good group fighting for a just cause

I do not agree that allowing black people to rape and murder white people with impunity is a just cause.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2021 01:02 pm
Two charged in death of officer during the insurection.

Quote:
U.S. law enforcement agents have arrested two men who participated in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and charged them with assaulting a police officer who died after responding to the riot.

Julian Elie Khater, 32, of Pennsylvania and George Pierre Tanios, 39, of West Virginia were arrested Sunday and are expected to appear in federal court Monday, The Washington Post first reported.

Khater and Tanios are charged with nine counts, including assaulting U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick with a deadly weapon. Sicknick died as a result of the riot, though authorities have not determined his exact cause of death...

Khater and Tanios are also charged with assaulting another Capitol police officer and a D.C. police officer with a deadly weapon, as well as with civil disorder and obstruction of a congressional proceeding, the Post reported.
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2021 06:47 am
After the insurrection, America’s far-right groups get more extreme

0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2021 08:54 am
Army initially pushed to deny District’s request for National Guard before Jan. 6

Quote:
The Army initially pushed to reject the D.C. government’s request for a modest National Guard presence ahead of the Jan. 6 rally that led to the Capitol riot, underscoring the deep reluctance of some higher-ups at the Pentagon to involve the military in security arrangements that day.

In an internal draft memo obtained by The Washington Post, the Army said the U.S. military shouldn’t be needed to help police with traffic and crowd management, as city officials had requested, unless more than 100,000 demonstrators were expected.

The draft memo also said the request should be denied because a federal agency hadn’t been identified to run the preparations and on-the-day operations; the resources of other federal agencies hadn’t been exhausted; and law enforcement was “far better suited” for the task.

The Army leadership made its position clear in deliberations at the Pentagon the weekend before the event, citing those reasons among others, according to four people familiar with the discussions, who like others in this report spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal Defense Department matters.
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2021 12:37 pm
Momentum of Capitol riot inquiries stalls amid partisan flare-ups

I agree with Snood, democrats should begin to act like they won instead of trying to be accommodating all the time. But we never do. In the words of George W, I say to the republicans; "Bring it on." Let it all come in and then sort it out. Also time to end the filibuster.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2021 01:15 pm
@revelette3,
revelette3 wrote:
Also time to end the filibuster.

If there is one constant in politics, it's the fact that progressives always try to destroy America.

I suppose that's why progressives sided with the terrorists on the morning of 9/11.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2021 04:01 pm
@revelette3,
Quote:
But we never do.

It would have helped if we'd won convincingly in the last election. We didn't. Sure, we got Trump out of the White House. We managed to gain effective control of the Senate, thanks to the hard work of Stacey Abrams and others, but just barely. Meanwhile we lost seats in the House (!) — and we didn't fare that well in state legislatures which control redistricting. It's hard to swagger around D.C. as if we have some kind of mandate when our party barely won control. However, if Biden is seen to be doing a good job and if Trump's influence subsides a bit, we might be able to defy the odds and do better in the midterms. And since the Republican aren't going to compromise, we'll have to go it alone — we can and we will. But let's not pretend that our victory was overwhelming. Our majority is razor thin.

https://able2know.org/topic/555216-45#post-7113544
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Wed 17 Mar, 2021 07:54 am
@hightor,
I agree, however, not my point. In order to get Biden's agenda passed and be effective in house and senate, we should begin to aggressively use every tool at our disposal. Republicans have made it clear they are using the same obstructionist tactics they used during Obama administration. He tried to play nice, it didn't work then and it won't work now.
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Wed 17 Mar, 2021 07:57 am
Alleged Capitol rioters getting released on bail smacks of racial bias and hypocrisy

Quote:
More often than not, my primarily Black and brown clients are kept in custody. Hence my shock that so many suspected of violence on Jan. 6 have been released.
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  3  
Reply Wed 17 Mar, 2021 08:00 am
8 People Killed in Atlanta-Area Massage Parlor Shootings
Quote:

ACWORTH, Ga. — Eight people were shot to death at three massage parlors in the Atlanta area on Tuesday evening, the authorities said, raising fears that the crimes may have targeted people of Asian descent.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 17 Mar, 2021 08:07 am
@revelette3,
revelette3 wrote:
Republicans have made it clear they are using the same obstructionist tactics they used during Obama administration.

For those who are interested in reality, I'd like to remind them that the Republicans tried to work with Mr. Obama and it was Mr. Obama's inability to work with others that kept undermining the possibility of a deal.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 09:10:37