Looks like you guys were right. I found an old usenet FAQ list and it basically spells out a ton of stuff... it is or was a cult at some point under the premise of employment... I really don't know what to say about it other than I am a bit disappointed I suppose. There is some good reading although I don't see how he could not see the holes in some of his theories honestly...
Also, Dr Wallace (yeah he really is a dr in inorganic chemistry and worked for dupont at some point) was a huge gambler and wrote books about poker (advanced poker concepts) prior to NT. It kind of lends somewhat credence to his claim that he came upon NT while playing cards.. I really don't know. I think wallace may have been insane or at least bipolar. I am pretty sure he meant well in a lot of his theories at some point...
I dunno, check out the FAQ if you like:
http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/fedtax-l/msg02694.html
But you know, I wasn't there.. I guess if you are intersted in objectivism get the material online or stick to some more historically credible sources. I will disagree with the FAQ on a couple of points... FTL communication is somewhat plausable with some theory... the ether isn't quite 19th century anymore.. and I just heard on a mainstream science show (nova or something) the other night about escaping the universal collapse (big crunch) by dimensional hopping at the last minute... so I mean even with a critique.. critique the critique...
bi, I guess I should tell you that previously I was not suggesting that the founders were infallable. If you will look you will see that I was saying that they had rebelled against lesser restrictions (much less) than the gov't now practices... so for someone to get sick of the current gov't is not that big of a deal heh..
bleh... oh well.. c'est la vie!