1
   

Which Religion is the one truly most Murderous?

 
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 11:50 am
Honor Killings in Palestine

"The Whore Lived Like a German"

The Sunday Express (U.K.) December 12 mentioned that UNFPA estimates that 5,000 women and girls are murdered by family members each year in so-called honor killings.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 12:52 pm
The 5,000 figure that is being thrown around is "honor killings". The religion or culture of perpretator or victim is irrelevent. Honor killings are a problem in some Moslem countries. However, the figure includes Hindu dowry killings and what the UN includes "similar attacks in Latin American countries".

The concept of honor killing is just as much a part of the Jewish religion as it is a part of the Muslim religion. It was established with the law of Moses.

Modern Jewish clerics, along with modern Islamic clerics now overwhelmingly condemn the practice.

There are plenty of examples of honor killings being practiced in Muslim contries, and in India (a predominantly Hindu country).

I think that it is now rare in Israel, not because of the superiority of the Jewish religion, but because Israel is an industrialized nation which is greatly influenced by European culture.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 12:56 pm
Terry wrote:
LionTamerX wrote:
Which part of "Thou shalt not kill." is so difficult to understand ?

God never said "thou shalt not kill." The commandment is "thou shalt not murder," and after dictating the commandments to Moses, God ordered the Israelites to slaughter every man, woman and child occupying the lands he intended them to have. In addition to the 10 Cs, God gave Moses a lot of other laws with a mandatory death penalty for witches, false prophets, relatives who entice you to worship other gods, disobedient children, cursing your parents, sexual misconduct, doing work on the Sabbath, blasphemy, etc.

Which part of the Bible did you not understand, the part where God orders His people to put miscreants to death and massacre their neighbors, or the part where God drowns almost everyone on earth, slaughters first-borns, inflicts plagues, fire and brimstone and kills in myriad other ways, or the part where God required his own son to be killed as a sacrifice to himself to keep himself from sending us to the hell he designed for us as a punishment for having the sins he inflicted on us by inheritance from Adam and Eve, whom he set up for failure in the first place?
A corporal of truth escorting an army of misconceptions - the largest of which is that Adam and Eve were set up to fail. This may be hard to believe, Terry, but Adam and Eve were mentally perfect. They were smarter than me. They were even smarter than Setanta. And they were surely smarter than you.

They had a clear choice of whether to accept or reject God's sovereignty. They and the god they chose to serve set in motion all the abominations you are so eager to attribute to the true God. The bible provides a complete explanation which you would have to read in order to understand.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 01:03 pm
Quote:

This may be hard to believe, Terry, but Adam and Eve were mentally perfect. They were smarter than me. They were even smarter than Setanta. And they were surely smarter than you.


Hey now, At least I am smart enough not to take fruit from a talking snake...
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 01:05 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

This may be hard to believe, Terry, but Adam and Eve were mentally perfect. They were smarter than me. They were even smarter than Setanta. And they were surely smarter than you.


Hey now, At least I am smart enough not to take fruit from a talking snake...
You should have been there. Then we wouldn't be going through all this. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 01:11 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
The 5,000 figure that is being thrown around is "honor killings". The religion or culture of perpretator or victim is irrelevent. Honor killings are a problem in some Moslem countries. However, the figure includes Hindu dowry killings and what the UN includes "similar attacks in Latin American countries".

The concept of honor killing is just as much a part of the Jewish religion as it is a part of the Muslim religion. It was established with the law of Moses.

Modern Jewish clerics, along with modern Islamic clerics now overwhelmingly condemn the practice.

There are plenty of examples of honor killings being practiced in Muslim contries, and in India (a predominantly Hindu country).

I think that it is now rare in Israel, not because of the superiority of the Jewish religion, but because Israel is an industrialized nation which is greatly influenced by European culture.

Okay... Rolling Eyes
I understand that you love Islam.
I understand that you will write anything to justify your love for Islam.
I just don't understand why.
Do you actually believe that Allah wants Muslims to murder the infidels?
Or is it something else?
And, if by some chance I am reading you incorrectly, then I have to ask the other question - What have you got against Jews?
I read you with your mighty sword smiting the bad people of Israel, but why? What have they done to you?
Why would you write some total crap such as "honor killing... was established with the law of Moses," if you didn't really have a thing against Judaism?
And nowadays "it's rare in Israel." Rolling Eyes Shocked
What the hell is wrong with you?
Oops. Sorry.... Ooommmm... Nam meyoho renge kiyoh.... mmmm....

Okay. I'm better.
Now either prove your stupid accusations or simply admit your idiotic anti-semitism.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 01:30 pm
From The law of Moses (Deuteronomy 22)

Moses wrote:

If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, "I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity," then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate.

The girl's father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him. They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.

If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.


This seems to be an example of the very definition of honor killing.
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 02:24 pm
neologist wrote:
A corporal of truth escorting an army of misconceptions - the largest of which is that Adam and Eve were set up to fail. This may be hard to believe, Terry, but Adam and Eve were mentally perfect. They were smarter than me. They were even smarter than Setanta. And they were surely smarter than you.

They had a clear choice of whether to accept or reject God's sovereignty. They and the god they chose to serve set in motion all the abominations you are so eager to attribute to the true God. The bible provides a complete explanation which you would have to read in order to understand.


I have read the Bible, but apparently you have not.

Adam and Eve were certainly NOT mentally perfect. They were ignorant and disobedient. We have no way of knowing their intelligence level, but I while I would agree that they were likely smarter than you, I would be willing to bet that they were not as smart or well-informed as Setanta, ebrown, me, and many other A2K members.

If God is omniscient, he knew when he created Adam and Eve that their particular brains and characters (which he gave them) would lead them to eat the fruit. Why do you suppose that he designed a test that he must have known they would fail? Why do you suppose that he gave a snake the magical ability to talk (reptilian brains lack the structures required for language and snakes have no vocal apparatus) and the understanding of the fruit's true powers that he denied to Adam and Eve? Why do you suppose that God wanted them to remain naked and ignorant?

God told Adam that he would die on the day he ate the fruit. The serpent told Eve that they would not die but that their eyes would be opened and they would be like God, knowing good and evil. They ate, they did not die, and their eyes were opened. The serpent was absolutely truthful but God lied.

If God created everything, then he is solely responsible for the abominations, including the ones blamed on the flawed beings he created.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 02:34 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
From The law of Moses (Deuteronomy 22)

Moses wrote:

If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, "I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity," then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate.

The girl's father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him. They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.

If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.


This seems to be an example of the very definition of honor killing.


I hope this doesn't come as a shock, but we have come a long way in 5000 years. Mostly in the past 2000 when Jesus was sent to erase these things.
0 Replies
 
Moishe3rd
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 03:20 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
From The law of Moses (Deuteronomy 22)

Moses wrote:

If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, "I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity," then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate.

The girl's father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, 'I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.' But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him. They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives.

If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.


This seems to be an example of the very definition of honor killing.

This is your definition of honor killing.
And, I would say that it appears to be Deuteronomy's definition of something, although it bears no resemblance to what is called honor killing amongst Muslims.
It sure as hell isn't the "law of Moses."
It is convenient to associate it with Judaism for your purposes.
It bears no resemblance whatsoever to what you wish to call the "law of Moses;" the first five books of the bible called the Five Books of Moses; the Torah; Jewish Law; or anything that even vaguely resembles anything Jewish.
None. Nada. Zilch.
It may have something to do with the laws of Jesus; or perhaps you are claiming it is part of the laws of Mohammad because he happen to read this Deuteronomy you are quoting, but it sure as hell ain't Moses.
And no, Israel doesn't practice this wierdness and never did.
It ain't Jewish eb.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 06:12 pm
Terry wrote:
neologist wrote:
A corporal of truth escorting an army of misconceptions - the largest of which is that Adam and Eve were set up to fail. This may be hard to believe, Terry, but Adam and Eve were mentally perfect. They were smarter than me. They were even smarter than Setanta. And they were surely smarter than you.

They had a clear choice of whether to accept or reject God's sovereignty. They and the god they chose to serve set in motion all the abominations you are so eager to attribute to the true God. The bible provides a complete explanation which you would have to read in order to understand.


I have read the Bible, but apparently you have not.

Adam and Eve were certainly NOT mentally perfect. They were ignorant and disobedient. We have no way of knowing their intelligence level, but I while I would agree that they were likely smarter than you, I would be willing to bet that they were not as smart or well-informed as Setanta, ebrown, me, and many other A2K members.

If God is omniscient, he knew when he created Adam and Eve that their particular brains and characters (which he gave them) would lead them to eat the fruit. Why do you suppose that he designed a test that he must have known they would fail? Why do you suppose that he gave a snake the magical ability to talk (reptilian brains lack the structures required for language and snakes have no vocal apparatus) and the understanding of the fruit's true powers that he denied to Adam and Eve? Why do you suppose that God wanted them to remain naked and ignorant?

God told Adam that he would die on the day he ate the fruit. The serpent told Eve that they would not die but that their eyes would be opened and they would be like God, knowing good and evil. They ate, they did not die, and their eyes were opened. The serpent was absolutely truthful but God lied.

If God created everything, then he is solely responsible for the abominations, including the ones blamed on the flawed beings he created.
Oh, this will be fun.

I would agree that Setanta is smarter than you and I put together and certainly Setanta is well informed to an impressive degree. No need for me to further trumpet my intelligence; I'll agree that you are smarter than I am. But Adam and Eve were smarter still. You assumed that because they chose to fail what seems to us a simple test, they must have lacked intelligence.

So you believe God, not Satan, is the cause of all the evil in the world. What you fail to take into account is the operation of free will. There was only one sin Adam and Eve could commit: the decision of whether or not to be bound by God's rules.

Since you are smarter than I, I'll just assume you were joking about God's giving the serpent vocal chords and intelligence. Surely you must realize Satan spoke through the serpent using his own powers. So, never mind Satan's use of the serpent. He could have used a hamster. Consider instead what was said:

Satan: "You positively will not die."
Fact: Adam and Eve lost their physical perfection and began their decline toward death on that same earth day. Additionally, they died within the thousand year period often referred to as a prophetic day. (Since you claim to know more about the bible than I do, I'll skip the citations.)

Satan: "YOUR eyes are bound to be opened and YOU are bound to be like God, KNOWING good and bad."
Fact: They ate and were given the knowledge of good and bad. Now they could decide for themselves. Tell me: How has humankind done in the thousands of years since in managing good and bad?

Free will a flaw? Don't leave the womb without it.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 07:57 pm
Y'all are havin' way more fun than i ever thought this thread would generate . . . Brahmin has no authority to answer for me. My object in this thread is actually to smoke out peoples' religious prejudices, but the question of the thread does not necessarily relate to which religion kills the most people for religious reasons. Simply, adherents of which religion are the most murderous. Now McG can make his considered response based on that criterion.

Neo, you may be a real fart smeller, but i've never made any claims to intellectual majesty, so do me the courtesy of not placing me on a pedestal i've never aspired to climb. Thank you.

Now folks, when venting your spleens on this topic, you need only deploy your personal animus based upon a contention that such-and-such a religion is productive of the most killers, without regard to whether or not said killers are religiously motivated when they do the dastardly deed.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 08:18 pm
Setanta wrote:
Neo, you may be a real fart smeller, but i've never made any claims to intellectual majesty, so do me the courtesy of not placing me on a pedestal i've never aspired to climb. Thank you.
Sorry, Setanta. But, in my defense, I only said you were smart and well informed. I didn't say I thought you were right, you, you etymologist! Exclamation

Now I have a question or, perhaps, an observation: Since murder is endemic to all religions, wouldn't the religion having the most adherents also produce the most murderers? Or are you asking which religion has the highest percentage of murderers?

Perhaps the poison finger should point at priests who by their authority incite others to commit murder whilst snuggling comfortably in their state authorized manses.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 08:21 pm
Etymologist . . . that's absurd, i hate bugs.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 08:23 pm
Setanta wrote:
Etymologist . . . that's absurd, i hate bugs.
Sorry, Boss. I call 'em as I see 'em.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 08:24 pm
As for the simple equation that most adherents=most killers, i think that can be quickly disposed of. It is entirely possible to have a non-violent community with deep religious conviction and a large population; it would not follow that the large number of adherents in such a community would be by default productive of a large number of killers.

I still vote for christianity--with or without benefit of clery, them boys has been akillin' and arapin' and aplunderin' to beat the band for nigh on to two millenia . . .
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 08:26 pm
Setanta wrote:
As for the simple equation that most adherents=most killers, i think that can be quickly disposed of. It is entirely possible to have a non-violent community with deep religious conviction and a large population; it would not follow that the large number of adherents in such a community would be by default productive of a large number of killers.

I still vote for christianity--with or without benefit of clery, them boys has been akillin' and arapin' and aplunderin' to beat the band for nigh on to two millenia . . .
Sadly, I agree. The religion which claims most loudly to have a covenant relationship with God has disgraced God's name with their carnage.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 09:13 pm
Quote:

And, I would say that it appears to be Deuteronomy's definition of something, although it bears no resemblance to what is called honor killing amongst Muslims.
It sure as hell isn't the "law of Moses."
It is convenient to associate it with Judaism for your purposes.
It bears no resemblance whatsoever to what you wish to call the "law of Moses;" the first five books of the bible called the Five Books of Moses; the Torah; Jewish Law; or anything that even vaguely resembles anything Jewish.


Moishe,

(It seems funny for me to have to teach you about your own religion.)

Deuteronomy is the English name for the fifth book of the Torah. In Hebrew it is דברים.

The passage I quoted, including the part about all the men of the town killing a woman for failure to provide proof of virginity, is right there.

Here is the same reference from a Jewish Torah site. The link has the original Hebrew.

Quote:

20 But if this thing be true, that the tokens of virginity were not found in the damsel; 21 then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die; because she hath wrought a wanton deed in Israel, to play the harlot in her father's house; so shalt thou put away the evil from the midst of thee.


Link to Torah
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 10:03 pm
Actually, Christendom, inasmuch as it does not represent true Christianity. Would you consider Christendom a political or religious entity, a combination, or what?
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Jul, 2005 03:59 am
neologist wrote:
But Adam and Eve were smarter still. You assumed that because they chose to fail what seems to us a simple test, they must have lacked intelligence.

No, I did not say that they lacked intelligence, but we have no way of knowing how smart they were. Odds are they were less intelligent than we are, both because our brains have had tens of thousands more years to evolve and because brains develop better in response to stimulation, which seems to have been lacking in Eden. They were certainly ignorant.

Quote:
So you believe God, not Satan, is the cause of all the evil in the world. What you fail to take into account is the operation of free will. There was only one sin Adam and Eve could commit: the decision of whether or not to be bound by God's rules.

If God created everything, then God also created evil. Why do you suppose that he gave the serpent knowledge that he withheld from Adam and Eve? Why would a perfect being choose evil, unless there was a design flaw in its character? How could Adam and Eve be held accountable for a decision made BEFORE they had any concept of good and evil?

Quote:
Surely you must realize Satan spoke through the serpent using his own powers.

Then why did God punish the snake, if it had no control over its use by Satan? (BTW, Satan seems to be a later concept.)

Quote:
Satan: "You positively will not die."
Fact: Adam and Eve lost their physical perfection and began their decline toward death on that same earth day. Additionally, they died within the thousand year period often referred to as a prophetic day.

It is NOT a "fact" that Adam and Eve "lost their physical perfection." The Bible says nothing of the kind. It only says that they were evicted from Eden so that they could not eat from the tree of life and live forever.

We do not know how long Eve lived, since most women were not important enough for their deaths to be recorded. She may have lived far longer than Adam's 930 years. In any case, God did not say to Adam that he would die within a thousand years of eating the fruit. He said that it would happen on the same day, and a day in Genesis had one evening and one morning. "Prophetic days" were invented to resolve the contradiction.

Quote:
Fact: They ate and were given the knowledge of good and bad. Now they could decide for themselves. Tell me: How has humankind done in the thousands of years since in managing good and bad?

We have improved tremendously in the last few thousand years. Human rights are recognized widely, in much of the world slavery has been outlawed, women are permitted to vote, children and animals are protected from abuse, violence is not tolerated, negotiation is attempted before declaring war, chemical and biological weapons are forbidden, many diseases can be cured, aid is given to the poor, and all in all, the world is a far better place to live now than it was.

Free will is not a flaw. The flaw lies in a God who punishes people for looking at the facts, correctly judging that the serpent spoke truthfully, and choosing knowledge over ignorance.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 4.35 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 01:23:04