@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Quote:I will just look for posts of yours that seem like real gems and downvote them until they are "below viewing threshold."
How christian of you!
Good luck finding any "gems" in the garbage I usually spew. But if you have the power to downvote posts below the viewing threshold that would suggest you are gaming the system and are somehow able to thumb multiple times. Hmm...maybe I should report you to the forensic experts on the site.
Well, I probably won't actually downvote posts to try to get them below viewing threshold, but I say so to get people to realize that they don't want it to happen to their posts. Some people will still not realize it from me saying it, however, so then I have to actually do it for them realize it.
You're right, in Christianity we are supposed to turn the other cheek; but of course there is a way to downvote to rebuke instead of doing it to spite. The difference is just in your attitude/spirit when doing it. You might say that doesn't matter, but if you think about it, it does matter.
Quote:Quote:So your solution for being censored is to self-censor.
No, just don't invest so much of your identity and effort into trying to increase your audience share.
If I just wanted to 'increase my audience share," I would say whatever I thought would make more people read my posts.
Of course I want more people to read my posts and read them more thoroughly/deeply, but that is because I am trying to reach out with information that not too many people get, like, or receive well.
You could teach a class and only a few students would understand or care what you're talking about, let alone like it. So with the internet you have the ability to cast material over a much broader audience, only a small fraction of whom might benefit from reading what have to say.
So it matters when some censorial people downvote your posts "below viewing threshold" to prevent others who might benefit from reading something you posted from ever noticing it to begin with.