@McGentrix,
I do not. The rules of science do dictate that we not spread false information knowingly. Only double blind studies with pacebos ON INFECTED INDIVIDUALS will enable us to evaluate the use of this. The "pile on" by both sides of the political aisle is, of course stupid and hasgotten toxic itself.
The paper you quoted up front had several major rrors with the big one asserting HOW the Hydroxycholoroquine really works.
There are about 4 other known drug with potential antiviral proprties that are being looked at QUIETLY. Im ure the guys working with HDC dont want all this publicity.
At the same time are studies of possible "herd immunity" effects as studies in Germany have come up with a range of potential immunity. (herd immunity kicks in at about 60% of the population with antibodies). However,but all their studies are possibly held back by some bad testing procedures and tests themselves)
At the same time Lash found information in Korea that some people, alrady cured, are showing "REINFECTION" with the antigen. There is reason to believe that the Korean tests may have some "false positive" rporting , or, if true, the antigen may be reactivated.
What we need is a quick series of highly accurate tests that provide antibody/antigen data so all these studies can be properly interpreted.
We are like at the age of flight, except we are just at the time slightly after the first flight at Kitty Hawk and still not at the time of the "Wright Flyer".