The only way you could have known about this already is if you were psychic. This is breaking news.
Next, if I want to share my opinion, I will. Until then, get off my jock.
Lastly, it is not "OK in Texas but not OK in Kentucky." These cases are very fact specific. The facts were different in both, so the decisions were different in both.
and please stop defecating in threads.
No, not psychic, little one...just plugged in.
Seems your more interested in posting articles and have no opinions. Maybe you should be working for Drudge since you have nothing else to offer.
The last of the internet tough guys.
Come on man - you know you would cork it in public or to a persons face. Let your keyboard be your mouth.
TF
0 Replies
Dartagnan
1
Reply
Mon 27 Jun, 2005 11:20 am
ConstitutionalGirl wrote:
They should have the right to bear the Ten Conmandments, without going to court.
Is the right to "bear the Ten Commandments" similar to the right to bear arms? Just wondering...
Anyhow, I think the ruling is exemplary.
0 Replies
thethinkfactory
1
Reply
Mon 27 Jun, 2005 11:23 am
Good response Woiyo.
TF
0 Replies
thethinkfactory
1
Reply
Mon 27 Jun, 2005 11:24 am
McGentrix wrote:
I'd like to see more monuments featuring the Four Noble Truths, myself. They are far more satisfying...
You got the word brother.
TF
0 Replies
Dartagnan
1
Reply
Mon 27 Jun, 2005 11:47 am
Amen to that...
0 Replies
Cycloptichorn
1
Reply
Mon 27 Jun, 2005 12:11 pm
ConstitutionalGirl wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
Of coarse they would applause, that's their abnormal nature.
You are absolutely, ridiculously unqualified to talk about this subject....
Cheers, lol
Cycloptichorn
Think before you post, you don't want to embarras yourself.