Leash Law

Reply Wed 20 Nov, 2019 03:02 pm
Arizona State, Maricopa County and the City of Surprise have the same law with the same paragraph. " Hunting dogs need not wear a collar or harness with a valid licence attached" The City Prosecutor says it refers only to the tag meaning they still must wear a collar or harness. Is he right?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 2,595 • Replies: 1
No top replies

Reply Wed 20 Nov, 2019 09:29 pm
Well, this isn't a legal advice site, so you would have to take that up with with your attorney.

However, from a semantics viewpoint, one can take this to mean a few things.

It can mean that a dog that is actively hunting (as oppossed to just being a breed that is some type of hunting dog) doesn't need the collar/harness, but must wear them when they are not actively hunting.
I don't think it means that.

Or, and this is my take on it FWIW, that what is being discussed is the valid license, not the collar/harness.
Meaning they must wear a collar/harness, but it doesn't need to have the valid license attached. Maybe because it makes noise?

When you refer to "the tag", are you meaning the valid license? If that's the case, that's what the City Prosecutor said.

In any event, for the dogs sake, they should always wear a collar/harness, and be microchipped.
0 Replies

Related Topics

deutsch anyone?? - Discussion by tell me why
Languages and Thought - Discussion by rosborne979
english to latin phrase translation - Discussion by chelsea84
What other languages would you use a2k in? - Discussion by Craven de Kere
Translation of names into Hebrew - Discussion by Sandra Karl
Google searching in Russian - Discussion by gungasnake
  1. Forums
  2. » Leash Law
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 09/25/2023 at 08:22:35