1
   

filmgoer ?

 
 
Lin
 
Reply Sat 18 Jun, 2005 11:33 pm
Hi everybody,

I found a new word (a new word to me) "filmgoer". I'm wondering if filmgoer means "one who goes to see movies" or "one who love seeing movies"?

And I also saw somebody wrote "film-goer". Which one is correct?

Can I also say "moviegoer", "cinemagoer"?

Thank you very much!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 747 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Valpower
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Jun, 2005 01:21 am
Yes, a filmgoer is "one who goes to see movies". The hyphen is not standard usage. Moviegoer and cinemagoer are also perfectly acceptable terms.
0 Replies
 
navigator
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Jun, 2005 10:03 pm
Hi Lin. Hi Val. they are compound nouns ofcourse, right ?. Is it a formal way to use hyphen for compound nouns.

Thanks
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Jun, 2005 11:51 pm
navigator wrote:
Hi Lin. Hi Val. they are compound nouns ofcourse, right ?. Is it a formal way to use hyphen for compound nouns.

Thanks


No, Nav, hyphens do not denote formality. Hyphens are often used for new additions to the language, ie. new word combinations. After a time, the hyphen is dropped.

When exactly this happens is not exactly clear but many prescriptivists tend to be rather anal retentive so you often see someone screaming that a hyphen is necessary when it actually isn't.
0 Replies
 
navigator
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 07:52 am
Hi JTT, long time no see Smile
0 Replies
 
syntinen
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 04:21 am
Sometimes the hyphen is never dropped, if the compound would read oddly or just look ugly without it. Many people write "book-keeper" rather than "bookkeeper" simply because the double K looks unnatural. And "co-operative usually keeps its hyphen, although the word is 400 years old, because the two Os in "cooperative" inevitably look as though they were a single sound.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jun, 2005 07:51 am
I agree with Syntinen that some words do retain hyphens but from my reading, the tendency seems to be towards dropping them, at least in NaE.

Googled: at <.com>

Results 1 - 10 of about 49,900,000 English pages for "cooperative".

Results 1 - 10 of about 3,930,000 English pages for "co-operative".

Results 1 - 10 of about 907,000 English pages for "bookkeeper".

Results 1 - 10 of about 122,000 English pages for "book-keeper".

+++++++++++++++

Googled: UK pages only

Results 1 - 10 of about 657,000 for "cooperative"

Results 1 - 10 of about 730,000 for "co-operative".

Results 1 - 10 of about 62,700 for "bookkeeper".

Results 1 - 10 of about 42,800 for "book-keeper".

+++++++++++++

What I did notice was that many people treat 'book keeper' as a two word compound rather than a one word.
0 Replies
 
Valpower
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jun, 2005 09:04 pm
I remember being taught by one insistent teacher to spell coöperative with a diaeresis (not, properly speaking, an umlaut). Anything else could not be properly pronounced. I failed to kuperate, though.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » filmgoer ?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 03:39:26