0
   

Senate to Atone for Lynching Ban Delays

 
 
fishin
 
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 04:59 pm
Quote:
Senate to Atone for Lynching Ban Delays
Senate to Apologize for Never Passing Nearly 200 Anti-Lynching Bills Introduced in 20th Century

By JIM ABRAMS Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Jun 13, 2005 ?- The Senate on Monday is making amends for failing to stand against the lynching of thousands of black people, a practice that continued well into the 20th century.

Nearly 200 descendants of lynching victims, and a 91-year-old man thought to be the only living survivor of a lynching attempt, were on hand for the Senate apology for blocking anti-lynching legislation at a time when mob violence against blacks was commonplace.

"I came here to bear witness on behalf of my cousin Jimmy," said Janet Langhart Cohen, wife of former Defense Secretary William Cohen and a member of the group that has pushed for the apology.

Her third cousin, 17-year-old Jimmy Gillenwaters, was killed by a lynch mob near Bowling Green, Ky., in 1912.

He was one of 4,743 people killed by mob violence between 1882 and 1968, according to Tuskegee University records. Of those, nearly three-fourths, 3,446, were blacks. Lynchings reached a peak of 230 in 1892, but they were prevalent well into the 1930s. Twenty lynchings were reported in 1935.

During that time, nearly 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in Congress, and three passed the House. Seven presidents between 1890 and 1952 petitioned Congress to pass a federal law.

But the Senate, with Southern conservatives wielding their filibuster powers, refused to act. With the enactment of civil rights laws in the 1960s and changes in national attitudes, the issue faded away.

Lynching is variously defined as a violent act, usually racial in nature, that denies a person due process of law and is carried out with the complicity of the local society.

The sponsors of the resolution, Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and George Allen, R-Va., said they were motivated in part by a recent book, "Without Sanctuary, Lynching Photography in America," in which author James Allen collected lynch pictures, mostly taken by those participating in the killings.

"More than a half-century ago, mere feet from where we sit … the Senate failed you and your ancestors and our nation," Landrieu told descendants at a lunch in the Capitol.


Full ABC News Story here


So... Whaddya think? Should this be passed? Why? Why not?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 783 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 05:02 pm
Sounds well-meaning enough. Can't see any harm in it. Or am I missing something here?
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 05:06 pm
D'artagnan wrote:
Sounds well-meaning enough. Can't see any harm in it. Or am I missing something here?


I don't know! Looks plain enough to me on the face of it. I don't get the objections. 4,000+ people were lynched. I don't get why a public apology to their families shouldn't be made.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Senate to Atone for Lynching Ban Delays
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/21/2026 at 12:36:55