cjhsa wrote:Only someone who wants to spin facts could possibly find that illogical.
I'm not spinning facts. In fact I'm quite willing to concede (if only for the sake of argument) that the facts stated in the original article are entirely accurate: that crime rates are now lower, after the expiration of the assault weapons ban, than before. But, as Ronald Reagan insightfully commented: "facts are stupid things." Facts, by themselves, tell us little. It is only the connection of those facts in an orderly, logical process that makes them
mean anything. And, in this case, you may have the facts right but your logic has more holes in it than a target at a submachine gun shooting range.
cjhsa wrote:Where is the huge crime wave?
Crime waves are like economic depressions: they tend to have many causes. Ascribing a single cause for a crime wave (or the lack thereof) is both overly reductive and exceedingly simplistic.