trespassers will wrote:
I changed it when I realized I had skimmed your comments and had come away with a less than accurate impression of what you had written.
Again, you did not lead in here by expressing concern about the validity of the news, you led in with a cheap shot at FoxNews. Everything else aside, this story gives no one any reason to consider FoxNews any more or less reliable than any other outlet.
I'm not sure about "lead". Lead one was the title, about truth in journalism in general. Next came the title of the article. Third came a comment about Fox News, which I most definitely don't trust. Fourth was about implications in general.
Phoenix brought up the thing about singling out Fox news early on, and I specified that I was not just referring to Fox, that I was concerned about the news reporting that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11 and not facing any legal sanction.
Now, again, I most definitely don't trust Fox News. We can start a new discussion on that. There are few sources I DO trust, with the New York Times probably being at the top of that list, though I do not accept everything they say without question, either.