When Daniel Patrick Moynihan retired as a New York senator, several prominent New York Democrats urged Clinton to run for the office. She had attended Wellesley College in Massachusetts (she was from the Chicago suburbs) and then Yale Law School, where she met her future husband. She was familiiar with and well-known in the East. She had always been a conservative, and had campaigned for Goldwater in 1964. Marrying a classic southern Democratic conservative and moving to Arkansas was completely in line with her political history. When Charles Rangel, one of the longest serving Congressmen in the House, and a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus and then chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee urged her to run for Moynihan's Senate seat, it was a 24 carat gold invitation. She visited every county in New York, and ran an exemplary campaign. (Which leaves me bemused when I think of the train wreck of her campaign in 2016.) Her elections to the Senate were her own accomplishments, and had notying to do with her husband, who had zero political pull in New York.
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
And you think she could have been elected senator in New York if she hadn't married Bill Clinton first, and if he hadn't been elected president?
Sure, there are so many male politician's wives currently serving in elected office, do you really want to hang your hat on that?
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
Evidently, it cannot be proven either way, but I don't buy it.
Oh Gosh, that's too...........never mind, nobody cares.
@glitterbag,
To each his or her own opinions about folks. I can't force you to love Sanders and you can't force me to see Hillary Clinton as this big overachiever you seem to think she is. I think she benefitted from her husband career. She's not the only one. W Bush was daddy's son, whith well-known results. In the US system name recognition is key, and this and other factors empower political dynasties. Look at how some people wanted Michelle Obama to run for president.
@glitterbag,
That proves his point. They all owe their husband’s coattails. Sheesh, the echo chamber eventually does rot Centrist brains.
@Olivier5,
You better agree with them. The next step is for Blatham to make a big Nazi statement about you, telling everyone you’re a russian, and not to speak yo you.
Great example of American political discourse.
@Setanta,
Excellent recap. What I find so acutely concerning is how that information has been subsumed under avalanches of disinformation.
@hightor,
There are few weeks that pass where I don't turn to some youtube discussion or debate with Hitchens. Astonishingly brilliant and he was anything but cowardly.
But to your main point, the comfort and dangerous limitations of certainty, Packer has it right. Thanks for that one.
Hillary Clinton would have been just another Wellesley grad if her husband hadn’t been president.
See if you can answer this question: WHY was Hillary Clinton asked and supported by the DNC over other Wellesley grads?
You people have no association with truth left in you.
@Lash,
Gee, another Ollie clone.
@Lash,
"American political discourse"? Is that supposed to be some sort of gold standard?
Blatham is Canadian; I'm French. We know better than that.
@Olivier5,
I mean exactly what I said.
@Setanta,
Quote:When Charles Rangel, one of the longest serving Congressmen in the House, and a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus and then chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee urged her to run for Moynihan's Senate seat, it was a 24 carat gold invitation.
I suppose it was. Is the theory that when Rangel made this proposal to Hillary Clinton, in 1998, he did so without considering in the least her name recognition potential (she had just spent 5 years in the White House) and keeping his relation with her husband, Bill Clinton, then POTUS, behind some kind of mental firewall?
@Olivier5,
Once upon a time, an American, a Canadian and a Frenchman tried to share a common standard of political discourse... the rest belongs to the Very Bad Jokes thread.