1
   

Why Bush Can't Find bin Laden

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 05:48 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
I was hoping you might be able to help me with something I've been wondering about. Why is it that after WW2, the entire world failed to ever find Josef Mengele, the Auschwitz Angel of Death?


Well, after the war, he was serving four years as a farm stableman in the American Zone of what later became the state of Bavaria in Germany.

With the foundation of the Federal Republic, he escaped, via Genoa, Italy, to South America in 1949. ...

Brandon9000 wrote:
But how could it be that with so many people looking, they couldn't bring him to justice over such a length of time???


They didn't have the electronical, communication etc stuff as we have today in those days.
0 Replies
 
not2know
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 05:51 am
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
Because the bush family fortunes and the bin laden fortunes are too tightly entwined. Bin laden gets a free pass.
Money and personal gain...that's what bush cares about and that's his assignment from higher up.


well done blue ! :wink:

check this out, its defenetly worth watching, if anyone wants the link to download the one-hour documentry, let me know.

Bush Family Fortunes

Excellent one-hour documentary by Greg Palast about the Bush family that was aired on BBC Three. Covers basically all the major scandals: Bush's draft dodging, connections to Bin Laden's family, and the stealing of the election in Florida.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 05:58 am
not2know wrote:
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
Because the bush family fortunes and the bin laden fortunes are too tightly entwined. Bin laden gets a free pass.
Money and personal gain...that's what bush cares about and that's his assignment from higher up.


well done blue ! :wink:

check this out, its defenetly worth watching, if anyone wants the link to download the one-hour documentry, let me know.

Bush Family Fortunes

Excellent one-hour documentary by Greg Palast about the Bush family that was aired on BBC Three. Covers basically all the major scandals: Bush's draft dodging, connections to Bin Laden's family, and the stealing of the election in Florida.

I guess you mean Bush's honorable discharge and the election you lost. If you have some new evidence in those cases, I certainly urge you to turn it over to the authorities, or even to the Democratic part, which certainly possesses the resources to initiate a prosecution.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 07:53 am
Those of you laughing about this are idiots.

The fact that we can't find Bin Laden IS the number one threat to your and my safety, and your kids. Don't you remember? Have you forgotten already? Or do you just not believe he was responsible anymore?

While we're pissing around in Iraq, he's planning more attacks. The next one oughta be a doozy. But keep laughing about it.

:frown:

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 08:34 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Those of you laughing about this are idiots.

The fact that we can't find Bin Laden IS the number one threat to your and my safety, and your kids. Don't you remember? Have you forgotten already? Or do you just not believe he was responsible anymore?

While we're pissing around in Iraq, he's planning more attacks. The next one oughta be a doozy. But keep laughing about it.

:frown:

Cycloptichorn


What should we do about it, Cyclops? Besides not having invaded Iraq, I mean?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 08:58 am
Tico wrote:
Quote:
What should we do about it, Cyclops? Besides not having invaded Iraq, I mean?


Iraq notwithstanding, what IS being done? Seems to me that the fiasco in Iraq masks and overshadows the fact that OBL has done pretty much what he likes for the past 4 years. What is George W. actually doing? Anything? It begs the question that nobody can answer.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:03 am
I can answer if for you Intrepid.

George Bush has charged the US military to hunt down Osama Bin Laden. He has also tasked the diplomatic corp. with the job of getting the Pakistani govt as well as other governments to also hunt for Osama.

These tasks are in the process of being fulfilled.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:06 am
No, they are not in the process of being fufilled.

Tico, you hit the nail on the head. It's a matter of focus. It's still not too late to re-focus our forces and objectives around finding and catching OBL.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:08 am
McGentrix wrote:
I can answer if for you Intrepid.

George Bush has charged the US military to hunt down Osama Bin Laden. He has also tasked the diplomatic corp. with the job of getting the Pakistani govt as well as other governments to also hunt for Osama.

These tasks are in the process of being fulfilled.


Thanks. Just so I understand this correctly.. The military, most of whom are in Iraq, is looking for OBL. It is assumed that he is in Pakistan, so the diplomatic corp is charged with convincing the Pakitani government to help look for him. Other, unnamed, governments are also being asked to join in the endeavour. Is that about it?

What about the FBI, CIA, Interpol, CSS etc.? Are they involved as well? Why can they find all these other guys, but not him? Of course, when they find him, they will have to stop a lot of the other activities that they are involved in under the guise of hunting terrorists.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:11 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
No, they are not in the process of being fufilled.

Tico, you hit the nail on the head. It's a matter of focus. It's still not too late to re-focus our forces and objectives around finding and catching OBL.

Cycloptichorn


And with that renewed and refocused effort ... what shall we do? Shall we invade a particular country to look for him? I'm just wondering what you think needs to be done specifically once a change in focus is effected.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:11 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
No, they are not in the process of being fufilled.

Tico, you hit the nail on the head. It's a matter of focus. It's still not too late to re-focus our forces and objectives around finding and catching OBL.

Cycloptichorn


I missed the part where Tico talked about focus. Question
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:21 am
Intrepid wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
I can answer if for you Intrepid.

George Bush has charged the US military to hunt down Osama Bin Laden. He has also tasked the diplomatic corp. with the job of getting the Pakistani govt as well as other governments to also hunt for Osama.

These tasks are in the process of being fulfilled.


Thanks. Just so I understand this correctly.. The military, most of whom are in Iraq, is looking for OBL. It is assumed that he is in Pakistan, so the diplomatic corp is charged with convincing the Pakitani government to help look for him. Other, unnamed, governments are also being asked to join in the endeavour. Is that about it?

What about the FBI, CIA, Interpol, CSS etc.? Are they involved as well? Why can they find all these other guys, but not him? Of course, when they find him, they will have to stop a lot of the other activities that they are involved in under the guise of hunting terrorists.


I do not believe the entire military is needed to hunt for one guy. They are multi-tasking. I counted all the alphabet organizations in with the diplomatic corp. Also, do not forget the rather large boounty Bush has placed on Osama's head.

As an aside, I am not George Bush and therefore I am not privvy to everything he has done, I expect that no one on A2K is. Some obviously choose to believe nothing is being done, which when looked at abjectively is utter nonsense. Perhaps more could be done, but to claim nothing is being done is, well, crap.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:30 am
It is interesting that so many anti-Bush folks think so much of what Bush et al. do is calculated, hidden, and secret, yet they think they know everything that is being done to catch OBL.
0 Replies
 
not2know
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:37 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Those of you laughing about this are idiots.

The fact that we can't find Bin Laden IS the number one threat to your and my safety, and your kids. Don't you remember? Have you forgotten already? Or do you just not believe he was responsible anymore?

While we're pissing around in Iraq, he's planning more attacks. The next one oughta be a doozy. But keep laughing about it.

:frown:

Cycloptichorn


Cyclo, i think you are right, but don't you think the reason why we can't find OBL is because he doesn't exist, who knows he maybe dead according to the Israeli intelligence Bin Laden is dead, heir has been chosen
He might just be an imaginary puppet, we take him out when we need him.
The main question we need to ask is who benefited from the Terrorist Attacks ? and who benefited more from the Iraq war ?
and to reopen 911, catch the real terrorists.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 09:38 am
Well, we can certainly see the results of what is being done; not much to date...

I'd like nothing more than for Bush to wow me by unveiling a secret op that they've been working for four years in order to catch the guy that worked, and he's in custody.

This isn't about partisanship, it's about keeping one's eye on the ball. We suspect that the eye has been taken off the ball. This is not good.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 10:00 am
not2know wrote:
Cyclo, i think you are right, but don't you think the reason why we can't find OBL is because he doesn't exist, who knows he maybe dead according to the Israeli intelligence Bin Laden is dead, heir has been chosen
He might just be an imaginary puppet, we take him out when we need him.
The main question we need to ask is who benefited from the Terrorist Attacks ? and who benefited more from the Iraq war ?
and to reopen 911, catch the real terrorists.


N2K, that reminds me ... I think I saw your missing Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (AFDB) in another thread. Don't recall which one, but it looked similar to this one ....

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/afdbhead.jpg
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 10:02 am
God, Tico, that's right, anyone who disagrees with the party line is obvious a conspiracy theorist.

Rolling Eyes

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
not2know
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 10:14 am
Tico, Don't you realize that there are enough people to hate in the world already without your working so hard to give us another?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 10:15 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
God, Tico, that's right, anyone who disagrees with the party line is obvious a conspiracy theorist.

Rolling Eyes

Cycloptichorn


You think so? I don't.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 10:18 am
Really? Then why post the silly picture of the Tin Foil Hat? Just to be inflamatory?

Perhaps you should start taking your Lithium again.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/13/2025 at 12:53:05