1
   

Give Your DVD Player the Finger

 
 
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 11:15 am
Now they want your fingerprint in order to buy and watch DVDs... big brother is watching.

Quote:
Researchers in Los Angeles are developing a new form of piracy protection for DVDs that could make common practices like loaning a movie to a friend impossible.


University of California at Los Angeles engineering professor Rajit Gadh is leading research to turn radio frequency identification, or RFID, tags into an extremely restrictive form of digital rights management to protect DVD movies.


RFID tags have been called "wireless bar codes" -- though they hold more data -- and are commonly used for things like ID badges or keeping track of inventory in a retail store or hospital.


Though RFID tags are usually read by a wireless data reader, the proposed DVD-protection scheme would make no use of RFID's wireless capabilities.


Rather, the researchers are interested in the ability to write data to the tags, which can't be done on a DVD once it's been burned.


Here's how the system might work:


At the store, someone buying a new DVD would have to provide a password or some kind of biometric data, like a fingerprint or iris scan, which would be added to the DVD's RFID tag.


Then, when the DVD was popped into a specially equipped DVD player, the viewer would be required to re-enter his or her password or fingerprint. The system would require consumers to buy new DVD players with RFID readers.


Gadh said his research group is trying to address the problem of piracy for the movie industry.


"Content owners would like to have extremely tight control on the content so they can maximize revenue," Gadh said. "Users want to move stuff around."


Gadh said the proposed system is "absolutely" more restrictive to users than anti-copying methods already used to protect DVDs.


"By definition this is a restrictive form (of digital rights management)," Gadh said.


Gadh said he could not reveal specifically how the system would work, as it is still in the research stage. A prototype will be available by the end of the summer, he said, and at that point, it will be shopped around to movie studios and technology companies.


"I don't know quite what is going to work in the real world," Gadh said.


Most DVDs are already encrypted with an anti-copying mechanism called Content-Scrambling System. The encryption has been broken, however, and programs to descramble DVDs can be found all over the internet.


DVDs are also "region coded" so that discs sold in the United States, for instance, cannot be played in the United Kingdom. The region coding gives the movie studios control over where and when films are released on DVD.


Ed Felten, a computer science professor at Princeton University, called the proposal the "limit of restrictiveness."


"I think people would find it creepy to give their fingerprint every time they wanted to play a DVD," Felten said. "It's hard to think that would be acceptable to customers."


He said it seems unlikely that people would buy new DVD players with RFID readers in order to purchase DVDs that are less functional.


Privacy advocates have expressed concern about RFID technology because the tags can tie products to individuals, potentially without their knowledge.

Seth Schoen, staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said it's unlikely this DRM plan will be any more effective than others preceding it.


"It only requires one person to break it," Schoen said.


Schoen said this is the "smart cow problem": Once one of the cows opens the gate, the others will follow.


link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 634 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 11:36 am
I can understand the "why" of it - copyrights are important and business lose lots of money by people violating them.

I know that the advent of easy digital and quality reproductions has put a real dent in my own business and I am constantly trying to adapt to defeat copyright violators.

But this seems nonsensical. Who want to go through all of that to watch a movie? Not me.

I have heard that someone is developing a low cost DVD that erases itself after a few playing. That makes way more sense to me.

Now, if someone would only invent photo paper that erased itself when someone tried to copy it....
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 11:41 am
You probably hate people like me then... we scanned in all of the proofs for our wedding and have them backed up/color corrected and ready to print on demand. We still paid a ton of money for a book and a few extras not in the contract though.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 11:46 am
Yeah, yeah, I do hate people like you.

That is one of the reasons most photographers are moving to online proofs - they can watermark the images and otherwise prevent them from being copied.

Photographers lose lots of money to people copying their images and really, what's worse is that crappy copies end up in circulation and ruin their reputation for quality.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 11:57 am
Oh I'd never give out bad copies. The book they put together is simply awsome and that is what we show people... but there were some pictures that we wanted, but could live without, that just didn't fit in with the book we put together or we didn't want to pay INSANE prices for. To be honest we would have spent the same amount of money whether we scanned them in or not. We signed a contract for a certain package... got that package and spent even more then the original contract on a few extras that we really wanted.

But I know what you mean... some people buy the minimum and rip off the rest.

There were a few photographers that gave you the proofs after you spent X amount which I thought was a pretty good idea.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 12:07 pm
I'm glad to know that you aren't showing around bad computer printed copies. That is so hard on photographers.

One of the reasons that photography has gotten so expensive is just trying to offset the cost of stolen images. I've had people flat out tell me that they're just ordering one print and will make their own copies. When I point out that they will be violating federal law they just shrug it off.

People don't look at it as stealing but it so totally is.

At least you bought a nice package and you're showing it around. I'll bet the photographer got some work out of that!
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 12:53 pm
boomerang wrote:
At least you bought a nice package and you're showing it around. I'll bet the photographer got some work out of that!


Oh, we recommended them to everybody we know. I know of at least two others who have used them on our recommendation. They even have our wedding picture hanging on their "sales wall" to show off their talent.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Give Your DVD Player the Finger
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/01/2024 at 11:05:34