Proof Bush Fixed the Facts...

FreeDuck wrote:

So Help Everyone, Even **** Heads

signs of Frustration

0 Replies

Intrepid wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
SHeesh

Is this code for something? It seems like it's been used a lot today.

Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to break the code without asking for proof of the finidings from anyone that has not heard the tape which will self destruct in 2 seconds

The "SH" is a sign of solidarity with Saddam Hussein?

NOW YOU ARE MAKING ME MAD!

HOw so?

0 Replies

You make a remark about solidarity with Saddam Hussein and you have to ask why? Should I ask for proof? :-o

0 Replies

Intrepid wrote:

You make a remark about solidarity with Saddam Hussein and you have to ask why? Should I ask for proof? :-o

I'll tell my reasoning if you promise not to ask for proof of the underlying facts.

Look at this post by phygrad, and Cyclop's and your posts immediately following: http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1341572#1341572

physgrad wrote:

Are you suggesting that the US cannot use SH's history of aggression against him when considering weather or not he has WMDs?

....

([size=10]"SH" meaning "Saddam Hussein.[/size] ;) )

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Yeah, we gotta start somewhere, so let's start just killing people at random until we hit the right spot and noone has WMDs except for us.

SHeesh

Cycloptichorn

Intrepid wrote:

Did you read what your wrote phygrad? Are you serious? Warm up the F18's.... we have new targets!
SHeesh

You asked me to try and break the code. Okay, I'll admit it .... I'm not a good code-breaker. Exclamation

0 Replies

Quote:

You asked me to try and break the code. Okay, I'll admit it .... I'm not a good code-breaker.

But quite the ball buster Smile

0 Replies

tommrr wrote:

Quote:
You asked me to try and break the code. Okay, I'll admit it .... I'm not a good code-breaker.

But quite the ball buster

<shrug>

It's a gift. Laughing

0 Replies

squinney wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
As technology brings WMDs within the hands of less sophisticated and wealthy entities, ...associated with Bush, this was just the tip of the iceberg.

<SNORT>

Myself, I wouldn't be proud that the best I can do against someone's logic is a sound effect. Generally, actual debate is more respected, and generally, people who refuse to respond on point, under any pretense, are people who can't support their views.

In debate, a reasoned argument is deserving of respect, a sound effect given as the sole response to an opponent's argument merely means that someone is hiding the fact that they cannot respond on point.

0 Replies

Squinney, i see your snort, and raise you a guffaw . . .

0 Replies

Hmmm - how is this logic?

It is not "proof" - but it is certainly a damned fine cause to be even more suspicious of the activities undertaken by Bushco to engineer the war they felt they wanted.

Alll whistling in the dark and crap about Saddam Hussein supporters and declarations that the US is justified in invading whom they wish detracts neither jot nor tittle from the fact that this war looks more and more "fixed".

Which of you shall address the implications honestly?

0 Replies

Proof?

You want Proof?

You can't handle the proof!!!

Okay, read it and weep. Here's how it apparently went down:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/18/115427/494

0 Replies

So Bush lied. Big surprise Surprised

0 Replies

squinney wrote:

Proof?

You want Proof?

You can't handle the proof!!!

Okay, read it and weep. Here's how it apparently went down:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/18/115427/494

Sqinney nice link Smile

0 Replies

You didn't already have the DailyKos in your favorites?

Well, color me surprised.

Do you know about commondreams.org?

0 Replies

McG, rather than making cracks about the source, why not point out errors or mistakes in the source?

0 Replies

revel wrote:

McG, rather than making cracks about the source, why not point out errors or mistakes in the source?

0 Replies

Hey, I put on my best Jack Nicholson for that post!

0 Replies

McG, what is so funny about my post? I actually meant it in all seriousness.

0 Replies

revel wrote:

McG, rather than making cracks about the source, why not point out errors or mistakes in the source?

Exactly :wink:

0 Replies

When you don't have an answer, you put on a brave face and smile

0 Replies

Oh look! A doggie pile!

Before anyone else piles on, read my post again.

I made no crack about squinney's post at all. I made a comment regarding the fact that unable 2know, or not2know, or whomever had seemed to never before heard of dailykos.

Now, judging from the repeated ultra-liberal posting that individual has made, I found it funny they had never read the dailykos before.

Perhaps he/she had not heard of commondreams.org either. It was a public service on my part. Magnanimous even.

0 Replies

Proof Bush Fixed the Facts...

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know