1
   

Profile of Al Queda #3 just captured

 
 
gravy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 09:24 pm
Besides fantasy TV-shows, results you claim are not corroborated with facts of large scale prevention of plots.

At any rate, Let's make sure then that we stick with effective/legal/APPROVED BY OUR ARMY methods of interrogation so we won't end up sliding down the slippery slope where humiliation becomes sexual assault with flash-bulbs and stress positions bring death caused by disintegrated thigh muscles from repeated blunt impact.

The slide is an inevitability when you are dealing with believers/dogmatics that you end up in a one-up-manship of 'stress'ing them.

Survivors tell us that when a human is broken, they will say ANYTHING to get the hurting to stop, anything you want them to, which makes the framwork of 'hurting people to get the truth out' an ineffective proposition on both ends of the spectrum from 'torture-light' on downward to assault and murder.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:20 am
Quote:
That's why humiliation, stress positions and mental fatigue do not equal torture. Those actions get results, torture does not. Some people like to call it torture because it's a nice buzzword. Really gets the fingers typing when you call it torture.


I agree with you McG that there are appropriate and inappropriate techniques that can be used for interrogation. But we're not just talking about the approved techniques, are we?

Because we all know there's been quite a few cases of unapproved techniques being used, and one has to wonder which techniques are really unapproved...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:33 am
One of the great torture techniques in recent memory was the redistricting of Texas.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 10:58 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
That's why humiliation, stress positions and mental fatigue do not equal torture. Those actions get results, torture does not. Some people like to call it torture because it's a nice buzzword. Really gets the fingers typing when you call it torture.


I agree with you McG that there are appropriate and inappropriate techniques that can be used for interrogation. But we're not just talking about the approved techniques, are we?

Because we all know there's been quite a few cases of unapproved techniques being used, and one has to wonder which techniques are really unapproved...

Cycloptichorn


So far, the ones that have been accused of going beyond the the rules have been getting their day in court. Many are now sitting in jail cells of their own.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 11:00 am
No, you know as well as I do that the vast majority of those who went beyond the rules don't get punished. See my thread on gov't documents on torture.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 11:09 am
Quote:
Abu Ghraib guard England was ready to go to prison

05 May 2005 22:28:14 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Adam Tanner

KILLEEN, Texas, May 5 (Reuters) - Former Abu Ghraib prison guard Pfc. Lynndie England was ready to go to prison this week and was extremely disappointed by the collapse of a plea deal that could have put her behind bars for several years, her military lawyer said on Thursday.

"You still have a sword of Damocles hanging over her head at this point, which makes it extremely difficult to continue to live with," Capt. Jonathan Crisp told Reuters. "Now we are back to where we were a year ago, which anyone I think would recognize, is horribly wearing physically, emotionally and so on."

...


source


Remains to be seen what will happen...
0 Replies
 
Adrian
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 May, 2005 11:23 pm
Seems everyone has missed this;

Quote:
May 08, 2005

Captured Al-Qaeda kingpin is case of ?'mistaken identity'
Christina Lamb and Mohammad Shehzad Islamabad



THE capture of a supposed Al-Qaeda kingpin by Pakistani agents last week was hailed by President George W Bush as "a critical victory in the war on terror". According to European intelligence experts, however, Abu Faraj al-Libbi was not the terrorists' third in command, as claimed, but a middle-ranker derided by one source as "among the flotsam and jetsam" of the organisation.
Al-Libbi's arrest in Pakistan, announced last Wednesday, was described in the United States as "a major breakthrough" in the hunt for Osama Bin Laden.



Bush called him a "top general" and "a major facilitator and chief planner for the Al- Qaeda network". Condoleezza Rice, secretary of state, said he was "a very important figure". Yet the backslapping in Washington and Islamabad has astonished European terrorism experts, who point out that the Libyan was neither on the FBI's most wanted list, nor on that of the State Department "rewards for justice" programme.

Another Libyan is on the FBI list ?- Anas al-Liby, who is wanted over the 1998 East African embassy bombings ?- and some believe the Americans may have initially confused the two. When The Sunday Times contacted a senior FBI counter-terrorism official for information about the importance of the detained man, he sent material on al-Liby, the wrong man.

"Al-Libbi is just a ?'middle-level' leader," said Jean-Charles Brisard, a French intelligence investigator and leading expert on terrorism finance. "Pakistan and US authorities have completely overestimated his role and importance. He was never more than a regional facilitator between Al-Qaeda and local Pakistani Islamic groups."

According to Brisard, the arrested man lacks the global reach of Al-Qaeda leaders such as Ayman al-Zawahiri, Bin Laden's number two, Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, the mastermind of the September 11 attacks, or Anas al-Liby.

Although British intelligence has evidence of telephone calls between al-Libbi and operatives in the UK, he is not believed to be Al-Qaeda's commander of operations in Europe, as reported.

The only operations in which he is known to have been involved are two attempts to assassinate Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's president, in 2003. Last year he was named Pakistan's most wanted man with a $350,000 (£185,000) price on his head.

No European or American intelligence expert contacted last week had heard of al-Libbi until a Pakistani intelligence report last year claimed he had taken over as head of operations after Khalid Shaikh Mohammad's arrest. A former close associate of Bin Laden now living in London laughed: "What I remember of him is he used to make the coffee and do the photocopying."

What is known is that al-Libbi moved from Libya to Pakistan in the mid-1980s before joining the jihad in Afghanistan. He married a Pakistani woman and is said to specialise in maps and diagrams. He is thought to have joined Bin Laden in Sudan with other Libyan nationals in about 1992 and to have become Al-Qaeda's co-ordinator with home-grown Pakistani terrorist groups after 9/11.

Some believe al-Libbi's significance has been cynically hyped by two countries that want to distract attention from their lack of progress in capturing Bin Laden, who has now been on the run for almost four years.

Even a senior FBI official admitted that al-Libbi's "influence and position have been overstated". But this weekend the Pakistani government was sticking to the line that al-Libbi was the third most important person in the Al-Qaeda network.

One American official tried to explain the absence of al-Libbi's name on the wanted list by saying: "We did not want him to know he was wanted."

Whatever his importance, al-Libbi is the sixth Al-Qaeda figure to have been caught in Pakistan, suggesting that the country is now the organisation's centre of operations. The interior minister, Aftab Khan Sherpao, conceded that Bin Laden and his deputy might be hiding in a Pakistani city.

"But the capture of al-Libbi will have made them very apprehensive. Whether big fry or small fry, they're on the run, I can tell you that."




Source.

But hey, never let the facts and all that....
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 May, 2005 11:26 pm
Yes, noticed it yesterday.... A "spelling mistake". Pathetic.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 09:54 am
Yeah, it's just more of their lies and bullsh!t.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 10:29 am
I nominate Homer Simpson to play the lead in the inevitable film biography of Geroge Bush.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 10:55 am
These guys are very good at creating diversions so folks will look the other way. Violence in Iraq goes through the roof and turmoil grows within the new 'government', so:

1) publicize an important capture (which turns out likely not to be)

2) stage a loud military operation and claim 100 insurgents killed (a military commander on the scene says maybe two dozen...no mention of civilian casualities of course)
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 11:00 am
Of course. They got called on the 'terror alert/bush approval rating' scam they were pulling, so they had to switch to something new.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 11:45 am
Just imagine Al Gore attempting to bore the terrorists to death.

Or John Kerry, who promptly after being faced with responding to an act of terrorism against the U.S., moves to France.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 11:51 am
Right, right. Can't say anything in defense of your guys? Turn to base insults.

Why don't you go polish your guns and leave the discussion to those with a brain, cjhsa?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 11:56 am
You completely miss my point, as always, eyeball.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 11:58 am
You know as well as I do that you don't have one. Your purpose was to irritate and ridicule. Childish.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 12:01 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You know as well as I do that you don't have one. Your purpose was to irritate and ridicule. Childish.

Cycloptichorn


And what was your purpose?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 12:02 pm
Why is it that Cyclops is allowed to get away with personal insults, repeatedly?

"III.5) Lively debate is accepted, and even encouraged, but personal attacks are not. Active topics and heated debate are welcome in the Able2Know service. However, personal attacks are a direct violation of this Agreement and are grounds for immediate and permanent removal from the service."

And by the way my point is the Democrats have no clue and no idea about how to handle terrorism. It's a dirty job and we're getting our hands dirty to take care of the problem. The Dems are complaining because there isn't any anti-bacterial soap.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 12:05 pm
You mean his accusing you of not having a brain is a personal attack in violation of the TOS of A2K? Shocked

Yes, I guess it is.

He is certainly not the very Palidin of reasonable and courteous discourse at this site.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 May, 2005 12:07 pm
There was no personal attack in there at all. You should learn to read more carefully.

Quote:
And by the way my point is the Democrats have no clue and no idea about how to handle terrorism. It's a dirty job and we're getting our hands dirty to take care of the problem. The Dems are complaining because there isn't any anti-bacterial soap.


See? Now that is a post that can be discussed, whereas your other one was not. As it is, this is completely wrong and you have no evidence to support this opinion whatsoever; you also have little evidence that REPUBLICANS know what they are doing, either, as terrorism has steadily risen under their watch, and actually the greatest terrorist attack against America was under their watch. Not a great track record.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/12/2026 at 02:16:13