0
   

US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

 
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 09:46 am
Well said Set.

The decision to fire the Royal Navy capital ships with oil was only taken after very careful consideration. (And in total secrecy). Oil gave the advantages of refuelling at sea, greater range, efficiency, ship manoeverablity, so much that Fisher said an oil fired fleet would always defeat a coal fired fleet. A delegation was sent to Persia to confirm sufficient supplies existed. The British government took a controling interest in Anglo Persian oil and awarded it a 20 year contract to supply the Navy, again in total secrecy. From then on the die was cast. The Navy on which the British Empire depended was irreversibly committed to oil. How interesting that Anglo Persian became Anglo Iranian and finally British Petroleum or BP now standing (if we believe their own advertising) for Beyond Petroleum.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 09:51 am
revel wrote:
nimh, this will dismissed in ican's previous word for the month, "cannot's." However, I am glad that people are stepping up to say the facts and reality of the case.

Ican, the operative word there would be "believed."


Revel, Revel, Revel, what must I do to communicate with you?

There is nothing in nimh's post that villifies those with whom he disagrees. There is plenty within his post that strongly criticizes the Bush administration's stategy and tactics for developing a free Iraq.

By the way, I have "believed" and do believe that the Bush administration's strategy and tactics for developing a free Iraq are faulty. I have posted here from time to time what I think needs to be done to correct those faults.

I proposed that we encourage the Iraqis to adopt an Articles of Confederation modeled after the US Articles of Confederation that was formally adopted in 11/15/1777. These Articles were replaced when our original Constitution was formally adopted 3/4/1789 (subsequently amended 27 times--the last 5/7/1992). I proposed this thinking that the Iraqis also will have to learn over time what will actually work for them.

I also proposed that the malignancy be exterminated and not merely temporarily incarcerated. I proposed this because the doctrine DAMD (i.e., Die And Make Die) the malignancy is attempting to follow compels them to murder those attempting to follow LALL (i.e., Live And Let Live).
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 10:04 am
Actually, it really would be the best, if Iraq became at first a colony and later an unincorporated and unorganized territory.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 10:08 am
Before you can exterminate anybody, you have to identify them and keep them in one place long enough in order to do the exterminating.

How do you propose to do this? Put an advert in the Baghdad Times?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 12:18 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
Haas has it exactly right!

Nothing the civilians being mass murdered, or the civilians who will be mass murdered, have done justifies their mass murder. Nothing!

It is terrifying that you actually think otherwise. It is even more terrifying that you and other people who think like you, because of such thinking might eventually evolve into malignancies yourselves.

Goodgodgerty!


Haas says they hate us because of 'who we are' but doesn't provide a shred of evidence to show how this is true. This is becuase it is not true.

Yes, it is true. It is who we are and not what we have done that causes the malignancy to hate us enough to want to murder us. Whether Haas provided adequate evidence to support his opinion in this particular article is debatable. But what Haas did or did not do in his article is irrelevant to the question of whether there exists adequate evidence to support his opinion. The fact is there is more than adequate evidence to support Haas's opinion. Start with Osama bin Laden's fatwahs: 1992, 1996, 1998, and 2004. His 2004 fatwah is more than enough evidence all by itself.

Quote:
Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004
Translation By JUS

All praises be to Allah and peace be upon His messenger, Prophet Muhammad, his families, companions and whoever follows:

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.

We confirm and repeat this statement in support of the Ummah (Islam nation), caring for our Muslim brothers' blood for who we undertake these operations, to defend them, their religion, honor and lands and to be free from those who disobey Allah's Orders and continue to live with the Crusaders thereby gaining an evil omen.

We further repeat our warning to the officials and those who guard the American complexes and who stand with America and its hired help, who takes up arms against the Mujahideen for defending for them and their interests such as the Saudi government and others who choose to support the idol’s regime over the Islamic one. We call them to repent, separate and to hate idols by fighting them with money, tongues and arms.

Our prayer to Allah is that we may assist His religion and spread His word and we ask to be given His enemies. Allah alone is sufficient and the end belongs to the pious believers. There is no aggression except upon oppressors. Praise be to Allah is our last worship.

Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf
19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425


That's more than adequate evidence to support Haas's opinion that the terrorists hate us for who we are and not what we have done.

The question of the article isn't 'are the terrorists justified,' though that is the way you have chosen to look at it. The question was 'why do they hate us?' There is ample evidence that our DIRECT actions have lead to much of this extremism, and you know it! There is little evidence that they 'hate freedom' and want to kill us all.

What are the major goals of OBL and AQ, Ican?

Reformation of Dar-Al Islaam.

Hatred has consequences. It's these consequences and not their hatred emotion itself that matters to me. The stated goal of restoring Dar-al Islaam is all by itself more than adequate evidence of their hatred of both us and our doctrine LALL. Efforts to restore Dar-al Islaam are all by themselves violations of our doctrine LALL. Additionally, they demonstrate their hated by seeking to live by the doctrine DAMD with us the intended victims to accomplish their goal.

What did your piece a few posts above say again?

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
A booklet by the Pakistani jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (Army of the Pure), believed to be linked to the recent London bombings, declares the U.S., Israel and India as existential enemies of Islam and lists eight reasons for global jihad. These include the restoration of Islamic sovereignty to all lands where Muslims were once ascendant, including Spain, "Bulgaria, Hungary, Cyprus, Sicily, Ethiopia, Russian Turkistan and Chinese Turkistan. . . Even parts of France reaching 90 kilometers outside Paris." Blaming the U.S. for the delusions of these admittedly small groups confers a degree of legitimacy on Islamist extremists and undermines moderate Muslim struggling for the soul of their faith.


That's not a delusion. That's Dar al-Islaam. Of course I don't think it's going to happen or that it's right; but your piece is reinforcing my statement that the terrorists have other goals than just to kill. They have other reasons than just hate.

An hate goal and a killing goal cannot be made less horrible by any other goal they may have. The malignancy's attempt to restore Dar al-Islam is the consequence of their hatred of us.

You and Haas seek to simplify and demonize your enemies simultaneously. You speak about how they must be 'exterminated' and give them childish motivations. Ridiculous! You also seek to remove responsibility from the US for it's actions, which I find troubling at best and downright idiotic at worst. You are a smart guy; you know as well as I do that we have been messing around over there for a long time, and that we've lead to a lot of problems there in our search for Oil. All perfectly justified according to you, right? Not according to everyone.

Wake up! Underestimating the enemy will get you, and all of us, killed!

Oh yes, most definitely yes! Yes! "Wake up! Underestimating the enemy will get you, and all of us, killed!"

Yes, "we have been messing around over there for a long time, and that we've lead to a lot of problems there in our search for Oil." No, It is not "all perfectly justified." But all that "messing around over there for a long time" is not justification for the mass murder of civilians by malignancy; in particular, it is not justification for the mass murder of Iraqi civilians by malignancy.


There is an argument made by the other side, one I would like to see you address:

The US, through it's economic support and direct military action, has killed many, many more civilians than Terrorists have killed. Many more. We say we're doing it in the name of 'good.' They disagree. They also say that since we ELECT our leaders, and they choose to go to war, and we don't kick them out, then our civilians are complicit in the deaths of innocents.

How is this argument flawed?

I do not think it true that "The US, through it's economic support and direct military action, has killed many, many more civilians than Terrorists have killed." I have encountered zero evidence that this is true. The evidence I have encountered demonstrates that terrorists (e.g., nazis, fascists, communists, Arafat, Saddam, al Qaeda) have killed millions of civilians in the 20th century, and are continuing a high murder rate in the 21st century.

Perhaps, you are limiting your focus to the al Qaeda malignancy terrorist-caused death rate since 1996. If so please provide evidence that the "US, through it's economic support and direct military action," has since 1996 killed many more civilians than the current about 35 daily civilian death rate caused by terrorists.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 12:57 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Before you can exterminate anybody, you have to identify them and keep them in one place long enough in order to do the exterminating.

How do you propose to do this? Put an advert in the Baghdad Times?

Laughing

Based on several TOMNOM reports I've read, there are between 500 and 600 malignancy prisoners in Gitmo, and between 5,000 and 10,000 in Iraq.

Oh my, that's two places not one.

Even so, I think application of fire bombs or equivalent would be an appropriate way to exterminate malignancy (i.e., the mass murderers of civilians and the accomplices of the mass murderers of civilians). I think that these actions of malignancy constitute forfeiture of any claim to humanity and puts them in the same class as deadly human cancers.

Also, in battle encounters with malignancy we ought to exterminate them the same way and not take them prisoner.

Who knows for sure? Perhaps this approach will reduce the malignancy's ability to recruit.

By the way, posting the results of this appoach in the obituary pages of the "Baghdad Times" might also help reduce the malignancy's ability to recruit.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 01:44 pm
Today, I'll be red.

ican711nm wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
Haas has it exactly right!

Nothing the civilians being mass murdered, or the civilians who will be mass murdered, have done justifies their mass murder. Nothing!

It is terrifying that you actually think otherwise. It is even more terrifying that you and other people who think like you, because of such thinking might eventually evolve into malignancies yourselves.

Goodgodgerty!


Haas says they hate us because of 'who we are' but doesn't provide a shred of evidence to show how this is true. This is becuase it is not true.

Yes, it is true. It is who we are and not what we have done that causes the malignancy to hate us enough to want to murder us. Whether Haas provided adequate evidence to support his opinion in this particular article is debatable. But what Haas did or did not do in his article is irrelevant to the question of whether there exists adequate evidence to support his opinion. The fact is there is more than adequate evidence to support Haas's opinion. Start with Osama bin Laden's fatwahs: 1992, 1996, 1998, and 2004. His 2004 fatwah is more than enough evidence all by itself.

Quote:
Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004
Translation By JUS

All praises be to Allah and peace be upon His messenger, Prophet Muhammad, his families, companions and whoever follows:

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.

We confirm and repeat this statement in support of the Ummah (Islam nation), caring for our Muslim brothers' blood for who we undertake these operations, to defend them, their religion, honor and lands and to be free from those who disobey Allah's Orders and continue to live with the Crusaders thereby gaining an evil omen.

We further repeat our warning to the officials and those who guard the American complexes and who stand with America and its hired help, who takes up arms against the Mujahideen for defending for them and their interests such as the Saudi government and others who choose to support the idol's regime over the Islamic one. We call them to repent, separate and to hate idols by fighting them with money, tongues and arms.

Our prayer to Allah is that we may assist His religion and spread His word and we ask to be given His enemies. Allah alone is sufficient and the end belongs to the pious believers. There is no aggression except upon oppressors. Praise be to Allah is our last worship.

Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf
19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425


That's more than adequate evidence to support Haas's opinion that the terrorists hate us for who we are and not what we have done.

No, it isn't. This is far from evidence that that terrorists are doing their actions out of 'hate' of us. It specifically says that:

[quote]Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.


OBL specifically says that those who associate with the enemy will be treated as the enemy. Nowhere does it state that they 'hate' the enemy or that they hate the freedoms of the enemy. Ridiculous that you would even post such a tangential piece; it has nothing to do with the topic at all. You have failed to provide counter-evidence to my earlier posted evidence where OBL specifically states that they don't hate freedom and that it is the actions of the US that they are against.[/color]

The question of the article isn't 'are the terrorists justified,' though that is the way you have chosen to look at it. The question was 'why do they hate us?' There is ample evidence that our DIRECT actions have lead to much of this extremism, and you know it! There is little evidence that they 'hate freedom' and want to kill us all.

What are the major goals of OBL and AQ, Ican?

Reformation of Dar-Al Islaam.

Hatred has consequences. It's these consequences and not their hatred emotion itself that matters to me. The stated goal of restoring Dar-al Islaam is all by itself more than adequate evidence of their hatred of both us and our doctrine LALL.

Untrue, this is a huge logical jump on your part. You cannot equate a desire to restore their people to their former status of power with 'hate' and 'hate of freedom.'

Efforts to restore Dar-al Islaam are all by themselves violations of our doctrine LALL. Additionally, they demonstrate their hated by seeking to live by the doctrine DAMD with us the intended victims to accomplish their goal.

I reject the premise that we have EVER LALL. We meddle constantly in the affairs of others. We certainly haven't LALL in the Middle East. Further ridiculousness, do you know history at all?

What did your piece a few posts above say again?

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
A booklet by the Pakistani jihadist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (Army of the Pure), believed to be linked to the recent London bombings, declares the U.S., Israel and India as existential enemies of Islam and lists eight reasons for global jihad. These include the restoration of Islamic sovereignty to all lands where Muslims were once ascendant, including Spain, "Bulgaria, Hungary, Cyprus, Sicily, Ethiopia, Russian Turkistan and Chinese Turkistan. . . Even parts of France reaching 90 kilometers outside Paris." Blaming the U.S. for the delusions of these admittedly small groups confers a degree of legitimacy on Islamist extremists and undermines moderate Muslim struggling for the soul of their faith.


That's not a delusion. That's Dar al-Islaam. Of course I don't think it's going to happen or that it's right; but your piece is reinforcing my statement that the terrorists have other goals than just to kill. They have other reasons than just hate.

A hate goal and a killing goal cannot be made less horrible by any other goal they may have. The malignancy's attempt to restore Dar al-Islam is the consequence of their hatred of us.

Untrue. The attempt to reform Dar al-Islaam is not indicative of 'hate' or 'hate of freedom' at all. This is another unsupportable logical jump on your part. You merely seek to make every single motivation of the terrorists revolve around 'hate,' as if they were some sort of cariciature of a person, a beast. You underestimate and simplify your enemy's motives. A huge mistake.

You and Haas seek to simplify and demonize your enemies simultaneously. You speak about how they must be 'exterminated' and give them childish motivations. Ridiculous! You also seek to remove responsibility from the US for it's actions, which I find troubling at best and downright idiotic at worst. You are a smart guy; you know as well as I do that we have been messing around over there for a long time, and that we've lead to a lot of problems there in our search for Oil. All perfectly justified according to you, right? Not according to everyone.

Wake up! Underestimating the enemy will get you, and all of us, killed!

Oh yes, most definitely yes! Yes! "Wake up! Underestimating the enemy will get you, and all of us, killed!"

Yes, "we have been messing around over there for a long time, and that we've lead to a lot of problems there in our search for Oil." No, It is not "all perfectly justified." But all that "messing around over there for a long time" is not justification for the mass murder of civilians by malignancy; in particular, it is not justification for the mass murder of Iraqi civilians by malignancy.


Your ideas of justification and theirs differ. The question in this argument is not whether or not they have the correct justification or not, but from whether or not their actions are based upon a justification that they hate everything that we are or that they hate everything we do.

You admit that we've been active in their region for a long time, without invitation, and that all of our actions have not been justified. You claim that this still isn't enough justification for what they do. They claim that it IS justification for what they do. Your argument is that they do not claim this, when they have, over and over. Do I need to start quoting OBL's releases for you?


There is an argument made by the other side, one I would like to see you address:

The US, through it's economic support and direct military action, has killed many, many more civilians than Terrorists have killed. Many more. We say we're doing it in the name of 'good.' They disagree. They also say that since we ELECT our leaders, and they choose to go to war, and we don't kick them out, then our civilians are complicit in the deaths of innocents.

How is this argument flawed?

I do not think it true that "The US, through it's economic support and direct military action, has killed many, many more civilians than Terrorists have killed." I have encountered zero evidence that this is true. The evidence I have encountered demonstrates that terrorists (e.g., nazis, fascists, communists, Arafat, Saddam, al Qaeda) have killed millions of civilians in the 20th century, and are continuing a high murder rate in the 21st century.

Perhaps, you are limiting your focus to the al Qaeda malignancy terrorist-caused death rate since 1996. If so please provide evidence that the "US, through it's economic support and direct military action," has since 1996 killed many more civilians than the current about 35 daily civilian death rate caused by terrorists.


You list Arafat, Nazis, Fascists, and Saddma as terrorists. None of those are terrorists. Only AQ on your list counts as terrorists. Stop being dense.

Recent numbers have shown that the US is responsible for at least 20-30 thousand innocent civilian deaths in Iraq. We were bombing innocent civilians in Iraq during the whole 1990's. Our economic support of Israel lead to the untimely deaths of thousands of Palestianians and at least a thousand Palestianian children. Our economic sanctions against Iraq starved hundreds of thousands to death while we willingly allowed US companies to participate in the Oil-for-Food scam, or did you forget that tidbit? This adds up to far more than terrorists have killed.

You don't see yourself as responsible for any of those things, but the terrorists do. These are the actions that they hate; not our freedoms.

You can argue all day that these actions are not justification for what they are doing, or have done, and I'm fine with that. Just don't argue that they 'hate' us for illogical reasons, because that isn't the case, and furthermore, it is idiotic and dangerous to simplify the motives of your enemies.

Additionally, the '35 per day' number that you have thrown out is only accurate for the last two years or so. If you look at the number of people killed in Iraq by the US, and add the number of people starved to death in Iraq by our sham sanctions, it far exceeds reported terrorist casualties.


[/quote]

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 03:55 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Today, I'll be red.

No, it isn't. This is far from evidence that that terrorists are doing their actions out of 'hate' of us. It specifically says that:

[quote]Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.
[/color]

And it also specifically says that:
[quote]No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.
[/quote]


OBL specifically says that those who associate with the enemy will be treated as the enemy. Nowhere does it state that they 'hate' the enemy or that they hate the freedoms of the enemy. Ridiculous that you would even post such a tangential piece; it has nothing to do with the topic at all. You have failed to provide counter-evidence to my earlier posted evidence where OBL specifically states that they don't hate freedom and that it is the actions of the US that they are against.

Please post here OBL's paragraph containing the actual statement where "OBL specifically states that they don't hate freedom and that it is the actions of the US that they are against."

I say they hate us for what we are and not for what we do. You say they don't hate us.

OK! Let's agree to disagree on whether they hate us or love us or something else.

I now say they (i.e., the malignancy) want us dead for what we are and not for what we do.

I say they are attempting to follow the doctrine of DAMD (i.e., Die And Make Die), and we are attempting to follow the doctrine of LALL (i.e., Live And Let Live).

I say the DAMD doctrine if followed to its logical conclusion will result in their exterminating us. I also say our LALL doctrine if followed to its logical conclusion will result in our facilitating them exterminating us unless we exterminate them first.


Untrue, this is a huge logical jump on your part. You cannot equate a desire to restore their people to their former status of power with 'hate' and 'hate of freedom.'

Again it's not their desires I'm concerned about. It's their actions and the consequences of those actions. If they continue to act on their desires, then the consequences of even their attempt to restore Dar al-Islaam will cause many of our deaths even if we were to provide no more than passive resistance.

I think you are distracted by your fixation on their motives for murdering our civilians and the the civilians of other countries, and your lack of adequate attention to the horrible wrongs of their murder of our civilians and the civilians of other countries. Personally, I don't care whether they murder civilians because they love them or because they hate them. What I want stopped is their murder of civilians. If they murder motivated by love, I still want them exterminated so that they cannot continue to murder civilians.


I reject the premise that we have EVER LALL. We meddle constantly in the affairs of others. We certainly haven't LALL in the Middle East. Further ridiculousness, do you know history at all?

My premise is that we are attempting to live by LALL. Furthermore, I think many but not all of us have been successful in living by LALL in both the US and the Middle East. I think that self-evident. There's a preponderance of evidence of this in Britannica and Wikipedia.

Untrue. The attempt to reform Dar al-Islaam is not indicative of 'hate' or 'hate of freedom' at all. This is another unsupportable logical jump on your part. You merely seek to make every single motivation of the terrorists revolve around 'hate,' as if they were some sort of cariciature of a person, a beast. You underestimate and simplify your enemy's motives. A huge mistake.

First of all it is an attempt to restore Dar al-Islaam not an attempt to reform Dar al-Islaam . The restoration of Dar al-Islaam will of necessity be an attempt to destroy the governments of nations whose current boundaries are within the former Dar al-Islaam. The consequences of that attempt will be just as painful to the current residents of these nations whether the motivation for this restoration is love or hate or something else.

Your ideas of justification and theirs differ. The question in this argument is not whether or not they have the correct justification or not, but from whether or not their actions are based upon a justification that they hate everything that we are or that they hate everything we do.

Your fixation on the love, hate, or otherwise motivations are irrelevant. What is relevant is the security of our lives against being murdered by the malignancy. Do you understand that murder is the intentional killing of another person for reasons other than self-defense? If done because of hate, love, liking, disliking, or not caring, it is still murder. I fear those who mass murder civilians, and want them permanently stopped. How about that for an irrelevant motivation?

You admit that we've been active in their region for a long time, without invitation, and that all of our actions have not been justified. You claim that this still isn't enough justification for what they do. They claim that it IS justification for what they do. Your argument is that they do not claim this, when they have, over and over. Do I need to start quoting OBL's releases for you?

They claim both. Their principal claim is that what they claim we are (i.e., infidels, crusaders, friends of Israel, whatever) is justification for murdering us. They also have occassionally claimed that where we resided, and what we did was justification for murdering us. I disagree with these claims of theirs. I think murder of civilians is not justifiable for the reasons they give. I think it self-evident that their claims are based on a doctrine deadly to humanity.

You list Arafat, Nazis, Fascists, and Saddma as terrorists. None of those are terrorists. Only AQ on your list counts as terrorists. Stop being dense.

Recent numbers have shown that the US is responsible for at least 20-30 thousand innocent civilian deaths in Iraq. We were bombing innocent civilians in Iraq during the whole 1990's. Our economic support of Israel lead to the untimely deaths of thousands of Palestianians and at least a thousand Palestianian children. Our economic sanctions against Iraq starved hundreds of thousands to death while we willingly allowed US companies to participate in the Oil-for-Food scam, or did you forget that tidbit? This adds up to far more than terrorists have killed.


Saddam was a terrorist who during the 1990s murdered over 100,000 civilians! That number has been substantiated. Your numbers have not been substantiated. As for the Palestinians, they've been murdering jewish civilians living in Palestine since the early 1920s. They have continued that by continually murdering jewish civilians in Israel after it was established in Palestine. The Israelies wouldn't have to defend themselves by killing any Palestinians, if the Palestinians were to stop killing Israelies.

You don't see yourself as responsible for any of those things, but the terrorists do. These are the actions that they hate; not our freedoms..

They want us dead because we are not them. They want us dead because of who we are.

You can argue all day that these actions are not justification for what they are doing, or have done, and I'm fine with that. Just don't argue that they 'hate' us for illogical reasons, because that isn't the case, and furthermore, it is idiotic and dangerous to simplify the motives of your enemies.

They want us dead for among other reasons because we are not them. That, sir, is an illogical reason!

Additionally, the '35 per day' number that you have thrown out is only accurate for the last two years or so. If you look at the number of people killed in Iraq by the US, and add the number of people starved to death in Iraq by our sham sanctions, it far exceeds reported terrorist casualties.

I agree the about 35 murdered civilians per day is only accurate for the last two years or so. As for the rest of your claims, I require evidence to believe them.

Cycloptichorn[/quote]
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 04:04 pm
Quote:
They want us dead because we are not them. They want us dead because of who we are.


This sums up your whole post, and ideology; and it simply isn't true.

Though it does explain a lot about you.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 04:16 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
They want us dead because we are not them. They want us dead because of who we are.


This sums up your whole post, and ideology; and it simply isn't true.

Though it does explain a lot about you.

Cycloptichorn


It is true and your refusal to face that truth says a lot about you.

Yes these are their main reasons they want us dead: They want us dead because we are not them; they want us dead because of who we are. They emphasize that reason by their fatwas, a paragraph of one of which I shall subsequently post.

Yes, they have other reasons too. But none of their reasons constitutes a rational justification for murdering civilians.

1st Paragraph from OBL 1998 Fatwah:
Quote:
Praise be to Allah, who revealed the Book, controls the clouds, defeats factionalism, and says in His Book: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said: I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped, Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.


Quote:
I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 05:59 pm
Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
World Islamic Front Statement

23 February 1998

Praise be to Allah, who revealed the Book, controls the clouds, defeats factionalism, and says in His Book: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said: I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped, Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.



Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2005 06:03 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
World Islamic Front Statement

23 February 1998

Praise be to Allah, who revealed the Book, controls the clouds, defeats factionalism, and says in His Book: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said:
I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped, Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.



Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 02:40 am
Hey Ican, can you go easy on the bold stuff? Yelling doesn't necessarily make your message any more persuasive, you know.

Thats pretty much the lesson the politicians and clerics were talking about should learn as well.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 06:48 am
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/980223-fatwa.htm



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAS Note: The following statement from Usama bin Laden and his associates purports to be a religious ruling (fatwa) requiring the killing of Americans, both civilian and military. This document is part of the evidence that links the bin Laden network to the September 11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. The original Arabic text of this statement may be found here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
World Islamic Front Statement

23 February 1998

Shaykh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin
Ayman al-Zawahiri, amir of the Jihad Group in Egypt
Abu-Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, Egyptian Islamic Group
Shaykh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan
Fazlur Rahman, amir of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh


Praise be to Allah, who revealed the Book, controls the clouds, defeats factionalism, and says in His Book: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said: I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped, Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.

The Arabian Peninsula has never -- since Allah made it flat, created its desert, and encircled it with seas -- been stormed by any forces like the crusader armies spreading in it like locusts, eating its riches and wiping out its plantations. All this is happening at a time in which nations are attacking Muslims like people fighting over a plate of food. In the light of the grave situation and the lack of support, we and you are obliged to discuss current events, and we should all agree on how to settle the matter.

No one argues today about three facts that are known to everyone; we will list them, in order to remind everyone:

First, for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples.

If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

Second, despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation.

So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.

Third, if the Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state, and their endeavor to fragment all the states of the region such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan into paper statelets and through their disunion and weakness to guarantee Israel's survival and the continuation of the brutal crusade occupation of the Peninsula.

All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on Allah, his messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries. This was revealed by Imam Bin-Qadamah in "Al- Mughni," Imam al-Kisa'i in "Al-Bada'i," al-Qurtubi in his interpretation, and the shaykh of al-Islam in his books, where he said: "As for the fighting to repulse [an enemy], it is aimed at defending sanctity and religion, and it is a duty as agreed [by the ulema]. Nothing is more sacred than belief except repulsing an enemy who is attacking religion and life."

On that basis, and in compliance with Allah's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims:

The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty Allah, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah."

This is in addition to the words of Almighty Allah: "And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? -- women and children, whose cry is: 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from thee one who will help!'"

We -- with Allah's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in Allah and wishes to be rewarded to comply with Allah's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson.

Almighty Allah said: "O ye who believe, give your response to Allah and His Apostle, when He calleth you to that which will give you life. And know that Allah cometh between a man and his heart, and that it is He to whom ye shall all be gathered."

Almighty Allah also says: "O ye who believe, what is the matter with you, that when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling so heavily to the earth! Do ye prefer the life of this world to the hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the least. For Allah hath power over all things."

Almighty Allah also says: "So lose no heart, nor fall into despair. For ye must gain mastery if ye are true in faith."



It is better to get the whole fatwa in order to get the message clear. For the record I don't support Osma Bin Laden.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 07:52 am
The following is from materials used recently in a real life workshop, and I didn't take time to try to hunt up links for it. But it pretty well illustrates the mindset of those Ican defines as the malignancy I think.

NOTE: And before some numbnut here decides to interpret this as license to exterminate an entire race or religion, I, and I believe it is safe to say Ican, are quite confident that a tiny minority of people embracing the Islamic religion would even come close to qualifying as the malignancy.

Quote:
To push the enemy - the greatest kufr - out of the country is a prime duty. No other duty after Belief is more important than [this] duty. Utmost effort should be made to preapre and instiage the umma [communitiy of Muslims] against the enemy, the American-Israeli alliance - occupying the country of the two Holy Places...
--Osama bin Laden's Declaration of War, published in al-Quds al-Arabi, and Iraqi newspaper published in London: August, 1996


Quote:
"So we tell the Americans as people, and we tell the mothers of soldiers
and American mothers in general that if they value their lives and the
lives of their children, to find a nationalistic government that will look
after their interests and not the interests of the Jews. The continuation
of tyranny will bring the fight to America, as Ramzi Yousef and others did.
This is my message to the American people: to look for a serious government that looks out for their interests and does not attack others, their lands, or their honor. And my word to American journalists is not to ask why we did that but ask what their government has done that forced us to defend ourselves. It is our duty to lead people to the light."

- Muslim leader Osama bin Laden from the May, 1998 interview of by ABC
reporter John Miller


Quote:
Every Muslim, the minute he can start differentiating, carries hate towards Americans, Jews, and Christians; this is part of our ideology. Ever since I can recall I felt at war with the Americans and had feelings of animosity and hate toward them.
--Osama bin Laden in an interview broadcast on al-Jazira television. December, 1998.


And from David Zeidan:
Quote:
It [The Islamist political movement, Islamic fundamentalism, or Islamism] is partly a reaction to the severe crises of modernity converging with the rise of charismatic prophetic leaders. It is both a religious reform movement and a political ideology that includes a social element of protest by have-nots against an oppressive order, as well as a counter-attack on secularism, which has reduced the power of religion in recent decades.
"The Islamist View of Life as a Perennial Battle," Middle East Review of International Affairs, 5, no. 4 (December 2001).


And this from an Islamic sermon preached May 13, 2005:
Quote:
Look at modern history. Where has Great Britain gone? Where has Czarist Russia gone? Where has France gone - France, which almost ruled the entire world? Where is Nazi Germany, which massacred millions and ruled the world? Where did all these superpowers go? He who made them disappear will make America disappear too, God willing. He who made Russia disappear overnight is capable of making America disappear and fall, Allah willing.

We have ruled the world before, and by Allah, the day will come when we will rule the entire world again. The day will come when we will rule America. The day will come when we will rule Britain and the entire world - except for the Jews. The Jews will not enjoy a life of tranquility under our rule, because they are treacherous by nature, as they have been throughout history. The day will come when everything will be relieved of the Jews - even the stones and trees which were harmed by them. Listen to the Prophet Muhammad, who tells you about the evil end that awaits Jews. The stones and trees will want the Muslims to finish off every Jew.
http://memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=669
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 09:10 am
What began this posting of osma bin laden and other terrorist organizations fatwa's was to merely point out that it goes beyond just not liking who we are for them. Whether one agrees with them or not, they feel that we brought these actions on ourselves by our actions. The object of the debate is their mindset. I think it just over simplifies the issue of terrorism if we merely make such statements as "they hate our freedom..." Your own quote from Osma Bin Laden bears that out.

Quote:
"So we tell the Americans as people, and we tell the mothers of soldiers
and American mothers in general that if they value their lives and the
lives of their children, to find a nationalistic government that will look
after their interests and not the interests of the Jews. The continuation
of tyranny will bring the fight to America, as Ramzi Yousef and others did.
This is my message to the American people: to look for a serious government that looks out for their interests and does not attack others, their lands, or their honor. And my word to American journalists is not to ask why we did that but ask what their government has done that forced us to defend ourselves. It is our duty to lead people to the light."
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 09:15 am
Interesting that you picked that quote and ignored all the others Revel. Your words seem to support the mindset that bin Laden is justified in his campaign to 'punish' America et al. You seem to support the idea that we forced them into it. It is this kind of mindset that many of us think irrational and muddle headed. If they can get enough of you to think this way, they can greatly further their ultimate goal which is to subject the entire world to Islam.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 09:23 am
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/05.08.02.DemocracyinAct-X.gif
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 09:30 am
Fox and ican will never understand the motivations for young Muslims to turn to violence, but an article in today's San Jose Mercury News is spot on. I will only post excerpts from it. The title is "Another view - Is their bombing worse than ours?"

By Saree Makdisi, a professor of English literature at UCLA.

"The usual self-congratulatory contrast between "our" civilization and "their" barbarism has set the stage for a cycle of moralistic inquiries into the motivations of suicide bombers and the supposed duty of "good" Muslims to restrain "bad" ones.

Suicide bombing is merely a tactic used by those who lack other means of delivering explosives. What happened in London occurs every time a US or British warplane unloads its bombs on an Iraqi village.

But, you may say, our forces don't deliberately target civilians. Perhaps not. But they have consistently shown themselves to be indifferent to the civilian casualties produced by their operations.

Peaceful protest, persuasion, demonstration, negotiation or remonstration haven't made a dent in the single-minded US and British policy. If all legitimate forms of dissent go unheeded, illegitimate forms will be turned to instead. Some people will resort to violence, which does not produce the desired result but may give vent to the inhumanity with which they have been treated for so long. Paine was right: People who are treated brutally will finally turn into brutes.

This is a war between one form of zealotry and another, one form of ignorance and another, one form of barbarism and another. More of the same will not yield solutions. The time ahs come to be human, and - motivated by sympathy, actuated by reason - to think and act as human beings, not unthinking brutes."

Comment: Brutes like Bush and Company always assume big bombs will win; they are always wrong.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Aug, 2005 09:34 am
Your posts would have a lot more clout (and credibility) if you would provide links, CI. Otherwise I think at least some of us just assume they are from non objective and 100% biased sources.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 01:42:06