0
   

US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 03:21 pm
blatham, The mental health problems with returning troops is old news. Some reports concerning the mental health of returning troops involve a longer time span, and many young officers are getting divorced. Several months ago, the veterans in the hospital in Washington DC fileda class action suit against Rummie, because the government is cutting back or eliminating veteran services. It's really a crying shame.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 03:26 pm
Here's an interesting article dated April 2005. .

EDITOR'S TOP PICKS




Veterans Fight The 'Mental War'
Kansas City Star
April 14, 2005

WASHINGTON - For seven months, Pfc. Herold Noel of Brooklyn drove fuel trucks on the front lines in Iraq for the Army's 3rd Infantry Division.

He thought that he would come home a hero. Instead, he's become a symbol of the increasing number of former Iraq and Afghanistan service members suffering post-traumatic stress disorder who are seeking help from a veterans health-care system unequipped to handle their needs.

"Raising my kids while living in a car was not what I expected," said Noel, 25, at a Capitol Hill news conference Wednesday about a bill designed to help veterans like himself. "I expected the American dream."

The bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to increase the number of counselors, therapists and other specialists trained in treating post-traumatic stress disorder at its medical centers across the country.

It would also, among other changes, require the VA and the Defense Department to jointly develop programs to address the mental health problems faced by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.

"The mental health, just like the physical health of our service members and veterans, deserves to be treated as a top priority for us here in Congress," said Rep. Lane Evans of Illinois, the bill's sponsor and the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Veterans Affairs. "We cannot afford to sit back and wait."





Brooke Adams, a spokeswoman for the committee, said it would consider Evans' legislation. She noted that President Bush's proposed budget includes $100 million to implement the VA's first mental health plan that would provide treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health concerns.

The disorder can result from exposure to intense stress involving a direct or indirect threat of serious injury or death. In 2003, the VA listed more than 185,000 veterans with the disorder as having a service-connected disability.

The VA reported last month that about a quarter of the 49,000 veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan using the VA health system had asked for help for mental health disorders.

In addition, a recent study of four combat infantry units by the New England Journal of Medicine found that 15 percent to 17 percent of those who had served in Iraq and 11 percent of those who had been in Afghanistan showed signs of major depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder.

"The mental toll that this war has had on our newest generation of veterans is severe and growing," said Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq veteran and founder of Operation Truth, a nonpartisan group that reports on the war from service members' perspectives. Post-traumatic stress disorder, he said, "could very well be my generation's Agent Orange."

The legislation comes a day after the Republican-controlled Senate killed a Democratic plan to add $2 billion to supplemental spending legislation to help pay for a predicted increase in veterans health-care services. The plan contained more than half a billion dollars for mental health care.

For Noel, times have improved. After months of seeing his family split among friends and relatives, moving through shelters -- where his military decorations were stolen -- living in his car and trying to navigate the social services and health-care system, he recently received money from an anonymous donor to rent an apartment.

He's still struggling, however, with the mental fallout from his time in Iraq.

"This is the second phase of my war -- the mental war," Noel said. "I will fight it until I die."
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 04:56 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican,

The message is clear. They want us out of their holy lands and out of their sphere of influence, ie, the Middle East. They are willing to blow a lot of people, including themselves, up, to see this happen.

There is no indication whatsoever, as Lash foolishly claims, that OBL seeks to convert every Christian to Islaam or kill them in the process. None.

Cycloptichorn



Ok then! You think all that need be done to stop the world wide mass murder of civilians by al Qaeda and affiliates, is for the US and its allies to pack up and leave the Middle East.

That is incredibly simple!

Do you think there is any down side to that solution?

I guess you think that with that solution the following would be rescinded:

Quote:
All praises be to Allah and peace be upon His messenger, Prophet Muhammad, his families, companions and whoever follows:

Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.

We confirm and repeat this statement in support of the Ummah (Islam nation), caring for our Muslim brothers' blood for who we undertake these operations, to defend them, their religion, honor and lands and to be free from those who disobey Allah's Orders and continue to live with the Crusaders thereby gaining an evil omen.

We further repeat our warning to the officials and those who guard the American complexes and who stand with America and its hired help, who takes up arms against the Mujahideen for defending for them and their interests such as the Saudi government and others who choose to support the idol’s regime over the Islamic one. We call them to repent, separate and to hate idols by fighting them with money, tongues and arms.

Our prayer to Allah is that we may assist His religion and spread His word and we ask to be given His enemies. Allah alone is sufficient and the end belongs to the pious believers. There is no aggression except upon oppressors. Praise be to Allah is our last worship.

Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf
19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 05:30 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican,

The message is clear. They want us out of their holy lands and out of their sphere of influence, ie, the Middle East. They are willing to blow a lot of people, including themselves, up, to see this happen.

There is no indication whatsoever, as Lash foolishly claims, that OBL seeks to convert every Christian to Islaam or kill them in the process. None.

He wrote a Letter to America. Why don't you read it? Why make crap up when you can educate yourself? Read what he said.
Lash
Quote:
Unfortunately for you, people like me do know what the **** we're talking about. There are some of us who aren't getting our talking points from blogs and moveon.org and Micheakl Moore. We are reading about Islam, Bin Laden, and related history. Why don't you get some information?


First of all, I don't apologize for 'dragging that tired argument out.' It isn't tired. Listen to me:

YOU ARE NOT FIGHTING OR STRUGGLING
Are you?
YOU ARE SITTING IN FRONT OF A COMPUTER TYPING
Are you?


And there is no doubt in my mind, NONE, that I've forgotten more about the history and modern-day status of Islaam and Bin Laden then you've ever learned.
Oh. You're so smart! If you know so much, why isn't anything you say correct or supportable...? Have you ever said anything about terrorism, Bin Laden or Isfreakinlam that you can support wiht evidence...???? If you know so much, let's hear something you can support.
I've been studying this for over five years, daily.
Yeah, right. LOL!!!.
You make crazy claims such as this but then show absolutely no knowledge about what the goal of Bin Laden is: the reformation of Dar Al-Islaam. It has nothing to do with Americans converting or dying, no matter what crazy screeds you have decided matter.
So, now you know more about what Osama wants than he does...? I should have expected as much. Are you writing the history you're reading, as well? So you claim the Letter To America by Osama Bin Laden was a forgery? What--did he call you? Likely. You're damn well doing his leg work.
You get your talking points straight from the RNC.
Which talking points are those?
You are an openly Bigoted person towards Islaam as evidenced by your post on the last page.
You're openly bigoted against America, which is evidenced in most everything you write.
Frankly, you are not qualified to be discussing issues such as this.
I've shown a great deal of understanding about several geopolitical issues. You've shown nothing. Except cowardice and a preference for terrorists over the West.

Your emotional rhetoric sounds much more like you are a Muslim than it does a non-Muslim, "who has studied for five years." Why don't you say so?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 06:09 pm
'Bigoted against America,' Right, lol

And I'm no more a Muslim than I am a Christian or a Buddhist or a Hindu. I think the whole lot of religious people are crazy; but that's just me.

If you have bothered to read the things OBL has written over the years, you will see that he lists his primary reasons for aggression against America as being our military bases in Saudi Arabia, and the things he saw the Jews do in Palestine.

You can see that this is the primary reason they list for having attacked us in OBL's letter to America here:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,845725,00.html

Does he go on about our immorality? Yes. But they also call for us to stop supporting Israel and to get the hell out of their lands.

In OBL's 1998 Fatwah, found here:

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

You will note that he lists American bases in Saudi Arabia and our support of the Jews as the reasons for Fatwah. It says nothing about hating America or immorality or any of that. He also lists our continuing bombing of Iraq as a primary reason.

From a Nov. 2004 transalation of a Bin Laden tape"

Quote:
I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.


Nothing about our immorality or non-Muslimness there. Just our actions.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/79C6AF22-98FB-4A1C-B21F-2BC36E87F61F.htm

Your posting here:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1481220#1481220

Quote:
You go figure out what the Muslims want. When you figure out it's you bending down to worship their god five times a day and ripping your daughter's clitoris out and killing me because I refuse to do it-- will you do it?

That'll stop the terrorism. Osama has said all you have to do it convert, stop your immorality and gambling and adopt Sharia law....


Shows just how little you have actually read what OBL has said and written. You don't understand the point at all. True, during his letter to Americans he called upon us to convert to Islaam but do you seriously think that is his intention? No.

And he never says that conversion to Islaam will halt his actions; he SPECIFICALLY references American actions as his reasons for attack.

What this really shows is just how bigoted you have become towards Muslims. This is further confirmed by the last line of your last post:

Quote:
Your emotional rhetoric sounds much more like you are a Muslim than it does a non-Muslim, "who has studied for five years." Why don't you say so?


Only you would think that accusing me of being a Muslim would be some sort of insult. You really are beneath my contempt.

Cycloptichorn

ps I noticed that when you cut-and-paste you left out a line:

AND TRYING TO MAINTAIN A 4.0

if you're going to quote me, do it accurately. And try not to think about the guy getting shot who is REALLY supporting his country while you study for that paper.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 06:16 pm
"And I'm no more a Muslim than I am a Christian or a Buddhist or a Hindu. I think the whole lot of religious people are crazy; but that's just me."

It's not only you; I think they're crazy too!
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 06:31 pm
Cyclops--

You showed YOUR hand. I didn't consider asking you to reveal your Islamic faith to be an insult. I did think it would explain your emotional reactions--and preference for following through with their demands--rather than demand they stop the terrorism.

You have a weird fixation on my grades. Were you an underachiever?

Are you in Iraq? Where are you stationed?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 06:58 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
'Bigoted against America,' Right, lol

And I'm no more a Muslim than I am a Christian or a Buddhist or a Hindu. I think the whole lot of religious people are crazy; but that's just me.
You are obviously a proponent of the virulent form of Islam. You agree with Bin Laden's demands and say we should do as he says.
If you have bothered to read the things OBL has written over the years, you will see that he lists his primary reasons for aggression against America as being our military bases in Saudi Arabia, and the things he saw the Jews do in Palestine.
I have read some of what he has written. I am not willing to allow a terrorist to direct foreign policy. I am not willing to turn my back on Israel. I declare a fatwa against Palestine, for the things I've seen them do to their own children. I can't believe you buy that crap. Don't like Jews, do you cyclops?


Does he go on about our immorality? Yes. But they also call for us to stop supporting Israel and to get the hell out of their lands.
Do you know why we're in Saudi? Do you know about Saudi's background with the Wahhabis, the US--and Saudi's humiliation of OBL??
In OBL's 1998 Fatwah, found here:

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

You will note that he lists American bases in Saudi Arabia and our support of the Jews as the reasons for Fatwah. It says nothing about hating America or immorality or any of that. He also lists our continuing bombing of Iraq as a primary reason.
LOL!!! The continuing bombing of Iraq...Wasn't he pretty thick into the terrorist business before that...? You may want to hop to a terrorist's tune, but thank God you are in the minority. You talk like he's your hero.

From a Nov. 2004 transalation of a Bin Laden tape"

Quote:
I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

You seem to agree with him politically. Maybe you would like to hear more about what he has to say. Maybe they have a Big Brother program in Afghanistan. <Oh yeah. They call it Al Quaeda.>

Quote:
Your emotional rhetoric sounds much more like you are a Muslim than it does a non-Muslim, "who has studied for five years." Why don't you say so?


Only you would think that accusing me of being a Muslim would be some sort of insult. You really are beneath my contempt.
Back at you, but as I said, asking you if you're a muslim is not considered an insult, yet--though I'm sure the PC crowd has taken it under advisement. I just think you are. If there's no harm in BEING a Muslim, surely there's no harm in ASKING if you are ..

0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 07:56 pm
Well. I see this discussion is as deep and refined and informed as ever.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 08:33 pm
I would love to have five or six pages (a pipe dream) with information gleaned about Islam, OBL, Arab culture or any of the issues pertinent to the thread, devoid of personal insult.

I've often thought how fabulous it would be just to share information. But we can hardly get through three posts without some put down.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2005 08:34 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ican,

The message is clear. They want us out of their holy lands and out of their sphere of influence, ie, the Middle East. They are willing to blow a lot of people, including themselves, up, to see this happen.

There is no indication whatsoever, as Lash foolishly claims, that OBL seeks to convert every Christian to Islaam or kill them in the process. None.

Cycloptichorn



Ok then! You think all that need be done to stop the world wide mass murder of civilians by al Qaeda and affiliates, is for the US and its allies to pack up and leave the Middle East.

That is incredibly simple!

Do you think there is any down side to that solution?

I guess you think that with that solution the following would be rescinded:

Quote:
All praises be to Allah and peace be upon His messenger, Prophet Muhammad, his families, companions and whoever follows:

Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols
Jun 09, 2004

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.

We confirm and repeat this statement in support of the Ummah (Islam nation), caring for our Muslim brothers' blood for who we undertake these operations, to defend them, their religion, honor and lands and to be free from those who disobey Allah's Orders and continue to live with the Crusaders thereby gaining an evil omen.

We further repeat our warning to the officials and those who guard the American complexes and who stand with America and its hired help, who takes up arms against the Mujahideen for defending for them and their interests such as the Saudi government and others who choose to support the idol’s regime over the Islamic one. We call them to repent, separate and to hate idols by fighting them with money, tongues and arms.

Our prayer to Allah is that we may assist His religion and spread His word and we ask to be given His enemies. Allah alone is sufficient and the end belongs to the pious believers. There is no aggression except upon oppressors. Praise be to Allah is our last worship.

Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf
19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 06:19 am
Quote:
I declare a fatwa against Palestine, for the things I've seen them do to their own children. I can't believe you buy that crap. Don't like Jews, do you cyclops?



You have personally seen the Palestinians do things to their own children who would cause you to declare a fatwa against them? The fatwa would include all the Palestinians or just the ones you have seen abusing their children?

I am willing to bet that you haven't seen any Palestinians but have read articles or so called history books or seen news reports just like the rest of us.

I don't agree with the Palestinian method of allowing children to volunteer to blow themselves up.

However, I understand that they don't have a lot of choices other than using suicide bombs and the other terrorist methods left up to them when it comes to fighting because they don't have a regular army or weapons because they are occupied by Israel. Israel on the other hand has been given tons of weapons by us. It is therefore understandable why this situation would cause a lot of pent up hatred against both Israel and the US in the ME.

It has nothing to do with "not liking Jews" as it is so often simplistically put but everything to do with people who were not Jewish who were living in the area being unfairly shoved aside when the UN provided a state for Israel.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 06:47 am
Quote:
New Calls for Coalition Forces to Count Iraqi Casualties

Abid Aslam, OneWorld US
Thu Jul 28,10:36 PM ET

WASHINGTON, D.C., Jul 28 (OneWorld) - At least 24,865 Iraqi civilians have died since the U.S.-led coalition began its war in their country but the real figure is unknown because coalition forces, flouting the Geneva Conventions, refuse to aid an accurate count, said a leading medical journal.

''The adamant refusal of the U.S.A. and its partner countries to keep count of Iraqi deaths is a stance that renders farcical the Geneva Conventions' principle that invading forces have a duty to make every effort to protect civilian lives,'' said an editorial in this week's issue of The Lancet, released late Thursday. ''How can the coalition attest that it respects this obligation if it refuses to collect data to prove it?'' [..]

The journal cited the work of Iraq Body Count (IBC), a British-U.S. non-profit group that last week reported that 24,865 civilians had died in the two years since the war in Iraq began in March 2003. The IBC database, from which data for the dossier were drawn, lists only those deaths reported by two or more news agencies, The Lancet said. [..]

Coalition spokespersons, faced with a rising death toll of Iraqis killed in bomb and gun attacks on politicians and local police and civilian targets, have laid the blame for these deaths squarely at the feet of terrorist groups. [..]

The IBC, in its 28-page dossier, said [..] U.S.-led forces killed nearly 37 percent of the total [..].

Almost one-third of civilian deaths occurred during the invasion itself, from March 20 to May 1, 2003, when U.S.-led forces carried out their ''shock and awe'' bombing campaign against Baghdad. In the first year after the invasion, another 6,000 or so civilians were killed, according to IBC. The toll nearly doubled in the second year, reflecting a general increase in violence. [..]

Criminals, accounting for 36 percent of civilian deaths, came a close second to U.S.-led forces. Insurgents, however, accounted for a surprisingly small 9.5 percent.

''Unknown agents'' were responsible for 11 percent of deaths, according to IBC.

The IBC dossier covered civilians, army and police recruits, and serving police. It did not provide figures for deaths among serving Iraqi military, saying there are no reliable accounts, official or unofficial.

Based on an analysis of 10,000 media reports, the group also concluded that at least 42,000 civilians were wounded between March 2003 and March 2005.

The death toll closely resembled a U.N.-funded survey that last year found 24,000 conflict-related deaths since the U.S.-led invasion.

Conservative commentators have assailed the IBC dossier, saying the group's research was flawed.

''IBC is doing nothing more than blindly throwing darts at a dartboard,'' said Alston Ramsay, an associate editor of the National Review, wrote on the magazine's Web site.

Yet even these critics appeared to agree with calls for increased reporting of Iraqi deaths.

''Hard-and-fast numbers on civilian deaths would certainly be a boon to the national and international discourse on Iraq,'' Ramsay wrote.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 07:22 am
I'm posting this here as well as other terrorist/Iraq threads as a wrong impression of my views may have been given

rayban1 said to wandeljw



"You might want to ask yourself why Steve has so suddenly shifted his stance and whether or not you might be forced to do the same one day soon."

to which I reply



LET ME MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR WHAT MY STANCE IS.

I supported the war in Afghanistan against al Qaeda. George Bush's diversionary, unnecessary, illegal immoral and fundamentally counter productive invasion of Iraq has been a disaster in the prosecution of that war.

I blame Tony Blair for being so naive as to think that Bush could impose a democratic western oriented regime in that country at minimum cost. It has cost a fortune in life and materiel. We acted illegally, it is a stain on us. Its has been improperly executed, to the benefit of the very Islamist extremists we set out in 2001 to destroy.

It has galvanised the Muslim world against us. In their eyes Iraq justifies whatever a few extremists do to us, be it the WTC or bombs in Madrid or London, irrespective of chronological order or rationality. Tony Blair said there is no justification for placing bombs on the Tube. Well said Tony, I think we can all agree with that. But its not Tony Blair or Steve41oo who are placing bombs on the Tube. Its Islamist extremists who believe they have every justification, because Allah has told them its right, and they can see for themselves injustice in Iraq, Palestine and other places of humiliation for the Muslims.

Finally I get very cross when Americans tell us (as Whooda did) that we Europeans are living safe cozy little lives insulated from the threat of al Qaeda attack, or that we know nothing of urban terrorism, (30 years of IRA, mainly funded by Americans) or that it has taken the London bombings to shock us out of our state of delusion, and get fully behind the fight against terrorism.

WE WERE AND ARE BEHIND THAT FIGHT. George Bush has made that struggle infinitely more difficult, and we in the UK are paying for that mistake. A woman who used to live not far from where I write was blown to pieces on the Piccadily line, just going to work. My friend's mother was severely injured the same day (in a road accident) only to find the local hospital virtually devoid of staff as they were all in central London.

Iraq is a quagmire from which only the terrorists gain. They must thank Allah for the incompetence of Bush and Co. It will now take a herculean effort to properly take control of that country involving many more troops and many more years of pain and suffering. Having taken control of the oil fields, I dont believe Bush is to prepared to make that effort, even if it means the islamists extremists enjoy free reign in the rest of the country, to perfect their bombing technique and kill my neighbour.

I hope my feelings on this matter are now clear.

One other thing Rayban, you asked permission to quote me elsewhere. I specifically withdraw that unless to you make reference to this post as a fuller explanation of my "stance".
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 07:29 am
Lash wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
'Bigoted against America,' Right, lol

And I'm no more a Muslim than I am a Christian or a Buddhist or a Hindu. I think the whole lot of religious people are crazy; but that's just me.
You are obviously a proponent of the virulent form of Islam. You agree with Bin Laden's demands and say we should do as he says.
If you have bothered to read the things OBL has written over the years, you will see that he lists his primary reasons for aggression against America as being our military bases in Saudi Arabia, and the things he saw the Jews do in Palestine.
I have read some of what he has written. I am not willing to allow a terrorist to direct foreign policy. I am not willing to turn my back on Israel. I declare a fatwa against Palestine, for the things I've seen them do to their own children. I can't believe you buy that crap. Don't like Jews, do you cyclops?


Does he go on about our immorality? Yes. But they also call for us to stop supporting Israel and to get the hell out of their lands.
Do you know why we're in Saudi? Do you know about Saudi's background with the Wahhabis, the US--and Saudi's humiliation of OBL??
In OBL's 1998 Fatwah, found here:

http://www.ict.org.il/articles/fatwah.htm

You will note that he lists American bases in Saudi Arabia and our support of the Jews as the reasons for Fatwah. It says nothing about hating America or immorality or any of that. He also lists our continuing bombing of Iraq as a primary reason.
LOL!!! The continuing bombing of Iraq...Wasn't he pretty thick into the terrorist business before that...? You may want to hop to a terrorist's tune, but thank God you are in the minority. You talk like he's your hero.

From a Nov. 2004 transalation of a Bin Laden tape"

Quote:
I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

You seem to agree with him politically. Maybe you would like to hear more about what he has to say. Maybe they have a Big Brother program in Afghanistan. <Oh yeah. They call it Al Quaeda.>

Quote:
Your emotional rhetoric sounds much more like you are a Muslim than it does a non-Muslim, "who has studied for five years." Why don't you say so?


Only you would think that accusing me of being a Muslim would be some sort of insult. You really are beneath my contempt.
Back at you, but as I said, asking you if you're a muslim is not considered an insult, yet--though I'm sure the PC crowd has taken it under advisement. I just think you are. If there's no harm in BEING a Muslim, surely there's no harm in ASKING if you are ..



I came in from drinking last night, read this and Ican's post below, and sat down to write a post of my own entitled 'The seven idiocies of Lash, or, the Unbearable Lightness of Ican,' but on preview I wisely decided to wait for the light of day (and better judgement) in order to preserve my account status.

Now I'm glad I did! Because I can sum up several things a lot more efficiently than I did before.

Lash, Ican,

I've never once promoted the terrorist cause. I've never said that we should do what he says, as I am accused of here:

Quote:
You are obviously a proponent of the virulent form of Islam. You agree with Bin Laden's demands and say we should do as he says.


In a previous post, Lash chastizes me for not having read OBL's communiques. When I post not one but three of them, and compare the similarities within to find that OBL's major problem with the US has been our actions, and not our freedoms (in fact he SPECIFICALLY says this in his 2004 tape transcript), I get this in response:

Quote:

I have read some of what he has written. I am not willing to allow a terrorist to direct foreign policy. I am not willing to turn my back on Israel. I declare a fatwa against Palestine, for the things I've seen them do to their own children. I can't believe you buy that crap. Don't like Jews, do you cyclops?


Interstingly enough, Lash has now read some of what OBL has written. She has gone from being an (self-proclaimed) expert on Islaam, terrorism, and OBL himself to admitting that she is only familiar with some of the things he's written and said. And then goes on to accuse me of being anti-semitic.

Lash, I've been to Jenin. I've been to Palestine. I've seen with my own eye the kinds of things that have been done there. I've also seen bomb-cleared markets, ruins, and remains of busses in Israel. Have you? Do you know the real stakes of their conflict?

Don't ever accuse me of being anti-semitic again, little girl; you have no idea what you are talking about!

let's move on:

Quote:
Do you know why we're in Saudi? Do you know about Saudi's background with the Wahhabis, the US--and Saudi's humiliation of OBL??


Of course I do. I know that we, the US and in no small part the Bush family, made ARABIA into Saudi Arabia. Our relationship goes back a long, long time and they were an excellent strategic partner during the first gulf war.

This doesn't change the fact that the Saudis (and Wahabis) are without doubt the largest supporters of terrorism, with the possible exception of Iran. And yet they claim to be our allies. Last year (year before? can't remember) they were holding terrorist TELETHONS on TV with masked men asking for money to fight the Americans.

Do YOU know why we're not in Saudi Arabia with Military bases any longer? Do you? I sort of doubt it.

Quote:
LOL!!! The continuing bombing of Iraq...Wasn't he pretty thick into the terrorist business before that...? You may want to hop to a terrorist's tune, but thank God you are in the minority. You talk like he's your hero.


Foolish. You do realize that we never stopped bombing Iraq after the first Gulf war. In fact, we dropped bombs for every year of the ten/eleven years between conflicts there and killed hundreds of people. Note that this is primarily around the time that OBL decided that he'd rather start focusing on the Americans now that he'd cleaned up the Russians from Afghanistan pretty well. It is consistent, though you in your hysteria couldn't be bothered to check the facts on it....

Then you procede to accuse me of 'hopping to the terrorist's tune,' with no reason at all. I have never once said 'I think this is the course that we should take.' I have merely clarified your uninformed and Bigoted post here:

Quote:
You go figure out what the Muslims want. When you figure out it's you bending down to worship their god five times a day and ripping your daughter's clitoris out and killing me because I refuse to do it-- will you do it?

That'll stop the terrorism. Osama has said all you have to do it convert, stop your immorality and gambling and adopt Sharia law....

I appreciate you sacrificing your freedom for the rest of us. I'd rather fight than switch.


This post is incredibly wrong. It has nothing to do with what Osama has said, and you also say 'this is what the MUSLIMS want' instead of 'this is what the TERRORISTS want' because, simply, you are a bigot. You think this is a clash between cultrures. It is not. It is a clash between ideologies that has far more to do with class and money than culture. But being the Middle East expert, you know this, of course.

Quote:
Back at you, but as I said, asking you if you're a muslim is not considered an insult, yet--though I'm sure the PC crowd has taken it under advisement. I just think you are. If there's no harm in BEING a Muslim, surely there's no harm in ASKING if you are ..


You can be as coy as you want, we both know you meant it as an insult. That's what bigots do; they insult people by insinuating that they belong to an inferior race or group.

It has been really interesting watching you type these last few messages. My guess would be that you are going through some sort of personal problems in your life and have decided to take it out on me because I had the temerity to show you that you don't know what the hell you are talking about when it comes to Terrorism, OBL, and Islaam. This interesting little tidbit here:

Quote:
i may be faced with making sacrifices.


Leads me to believe that either you, or someone you know, will be heading to Iraq soon. Well, let's just make that someone you know, because we here all realize that you are far too much of a coward to go yourself, but would rather send someone else to fight in your stead.

Now, at some point you countered with 'are you fighting? are you serving?' But you would have to take that up with Uncle Sam; even in our tough recruiting times, they still don't take people with one eye. Sad, really; 5 generations of military service, broken, due to an accident of birth and a malfunctioning ocular nerve.

Until you can come up with better evidence to support your bigoted, false claims, than calling me a terrorist or a Muslim, don't even bother replying, okay? You can keep your vitriol to yourself. You state that

Quote:
I would love to have five or six pages (a pipe dream) with information gleaned about Islam, OBL, Arab culture or any of the issues pertinent to the thread, devoid of personal insult.


Well, step up to the plate, 4.0. Bring the documents to back up your claims that OBL's goal is to get rid of our freedoms and perfrom Clitoridectomy on our women. Prove to me that your claims are true, or admit that you wrote them while you were angry and not thinking straight.

Put up, or Shut up!

Ican,
Quote:
Ok then! You think all that need be done to stop the world wide mass murder of civilians by al Qaeda and affiliates, is for the US and its allies to pack up and leave the Middle East.

That is incredibly simple!

Do you think there is any down side to that solution?


Sheesh.

You righties are so eager to have this argument that you are purporting that I said something which was never, in fact, said.

I have never once advocated folding to terrorist demands. I have never said that I think we should withdraw from the ME completely. I've never advocated and immediate withdrawl from Iraq (though I did advocate not attacking in the first place). Therefore, how can you possibly state that I think we 'should' do these things?

All I have done is to re-post the actual writings of the bad guys in order to glean their intentions. It is, as you have heard me say many times, critical to understand your enemies if you wish to succeed!

It is NOT critical to give in to their demands, but merely to understand why they are demanding these things and what motivates them to terror. The london attacks have shown us that it isn't just Arabs, or Middle Easterners who are a problem; Terrorism is an ideology, a mindset. If we can't figure out how to stop the spread of the mindset, we won't win this fight. Period.

If you can't understand the writings of the leader of the terrorists, you can't understand how to stop the spread of ideas. Period.

Therefore, why don't we stop accusing me of being pro-terroist, and instead start discussing ways to better understand the motivation of the terrorists and stop the spread of their poisonous memes. I know you aren't going to want to hear it, but this will probably take some concessions on our part in one form or another. I have a hard time seeing any other alternative working out in the long run.

Cheers to everyone

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 09:57 am
Now that we're done with that little piece of work, back to the topic:

Quote:
Turkey calls for U.S. action against PKK
Compiled by Daily Star staff
Friday, July 29, 2005


Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has again warned he could take action against Kurdish guerrillas in Iraq if U.S. forces did not stop the rebels infiltrating across the border into Turkey. "At the moment, frankly speaking, we do not see the efforts by the U.S. that we expect to see. We have expressed our views to that effect to the Americans," Erdogan said in an interview yesterday with Britain's Times newspaper. "There is a time limit. There is a limit to our tolerance," said Erdogan.

He said Turkey was within its rights under international law to defend itself from attack and drew a comparison with U.S. action against Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

"That mandate is provided for in international law," he said.

"If a country, if a people, if a nation are under threat, that country can do what is necessary under international law ... we would exercise that right in the same way as any other country could, would and did exercise that right."

Turkey has blamed the banned Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) for a rash of violence in the southeast of the country and says the guerrillas use bases in northern Iraq as a launch pad for attacks.

In the latest act of Kurdish insurgency, Turkish officials said Kurdish guerrillas have kidnapped the mayor of a town in eastern Turkey .


Hasim Akyurek, mayor of Yayladere in the Bingol Province and a member of Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party, was abducted Wednesday while on his way to inspect preparations for a local festival, the officials said.

The rebels stopped Akyurek, and a man traveling with him, said Bilge Eren, an official from the mayor's office.

The second man, Zulfu Coban, who was visiting from Germany, was released late at night and told Turkish security officials that they were kidnapped by members of the autonomy-seeking PKK, Eren said.

Turkish soldiers backed by helicopters were searching the area for the mayor, the Anatolia news agency reported.

Despite a lull in violence after the capture of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan in 1999, fighting has increased sharply since the group called off a unilateral cease-fire last year.

The PKK has waged an armed campaign for an independent Kurdish homeland in southeast Turkey since 1984, and more than 30,000 people have been killed in the fighting.

Turkey has vowed never to negotiate with the PKK and together with the United States and the European Union brands the group as a "terrorist organization." - AP, Reuters


http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=17177

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 09:58 am
Steve, Bravo! Iraq is not only an illegal war, the prosecution of the war is also a crime against humanity. Our invasion killed thousands of innocent men, women and children when they posed no threat to Americans. Our military with the help of the CIA have used torture against our prisoners, a crime under the Geneva Conventions. Our military have used flash/kerosene bombs in Iraq after our country signed an agreement not to use them. Too many countries are silent concerning these crimes. Any other political leadership responsible for similar crimes would be serving a life time in prison by now.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 10:03 am
Here's a glowing report of the Situation in Baghdad:

Quote:
In Jaded, Perilous Capital, A Collision of Perceptions
Life in Baghdad Looks Greener Inside the Zone

By Ellen Knickmeyer and Naseer Nouri
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, July 29, 2005; A14



BAGHDAD, July 28 -- At 11 a.m. in the Iraqi capital, the popping of automatic-weapons fire broke out from one end of a Tigris River bridge to another. Pedestrians jaded by gunfire walked for cover. It was Baghdad's equivalent of a car horn -- guards shooting into the air to clear the way for some dignitary.

Across the Tigris, gray smoke billowed over the city from a bomb. Under the bridge, ski-masked Shiite Muslim commandos cruised through checkpoints in pickups mounted with machine guns.

Nearby, a man stood in the middle of the street holding a gun to the head of another man in a car. Other drivers steered around them. No one stopped to help, or looked that carefully. After more than two years of war, Baghdad's people have learned to choose their battles, and this one didn't qualify.

On the city's streets, the daily reality involves death, random violence and routine deprivations for people who are beyond anger. But a different view has been presented in the Green Zone, the concrete-barricaded headquarters for U.S. troops, diplomats and contractors, and the interim Iraqi government. There, the situation is described as progressing toward a gradual handover from U.S. forces to Iraqi control.

During a visit to Baghdad this week by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey, said a partial troop withdrawal might begin in early spring. His assessment was repeated Thursday at a weekly briefing. "Every day you see the Iraqi people going about their lives -- sometimes under challenging circumstances -- gives confirmation we've got a good program," said the military spokesman, Brig. Gen. Donald Alston.

In statements to reporters in Iraq, the U.S. military has described the toll of the war, with regular reports on U.S. military deaths -- 1,790 so far -- and on some of the Iraqi civilian deaths. But the military has also attempted to highlight reconstruction, success against insurgents and the enthusiasm of the Iraqi people. "Iraqi, U.S. soldiers distribute frozen chickens," was the headline on a July 20 military press release.

When a bomber struck a Baghdad military recruitment center earlier this month, killing at least 10 people, Alston told reporters that the willingness of the Iraqis to keep showing up at such centers was a demonstration of their resolve. "To see these recruits come back again tomorrow or the day after these attacks, it is almost as if . . . the insurgency causing these attacks [was] giving the Iraqi youth the chance to express themselves," Alston said.

He said that Iraqis' commitment "to serving their nation" was "also a twist that is part of this particular sequence of attacks at this particular recruiting station."

Another U.S. military public affairs operation, Task Force Baghdad, issued a statement on a July 13 car bombing. The statement included this quotation: " 'The terrorists are attacking the infrastructure, the children and all of Iraq,' said one Iraqi man who preferred not to be identified. 'They are enemies of humanity without religion or any sort of ethics. They have attacked my community today and I will now take the fight to the terrorists.' "

On Sunday, the task force issued a statement about another attack in which a U.S. soldier and as many as 26 Iraqi children were killed. The statement included this quotation: " 'The terrorists are attacking the infrastructure, the ISF, and all of Iraq. They are enemies of humanity without religion or any sort of ethics. They have attacked my community today and I will now take the fight to the terrorists,' said one Iraqi man."

Several journalists pointed out the near-duplication. Lt. Col. Steve Boylan, a senior military spokesman, said Thursday that the U.S. military was looking into what happened and that procedures in Task Force Baghdad's public affairs office were under review.

U.S. military public affairs officers have also accused reporters of distorting the image of the U.S. campaign in Iraq. They have charged that reporters focus on insurgent attacks and ignore military accounts of U.S. and Iraqi troops finding weapons caches, blocking bombings and catching suspected insurgents.

On his visit here Wednesday, Rumsfeld and senior commanders prodded Iraqi officials to maintain momentum toward elections that will be a prerequisite for any start of U.S. troop withdrawals. But Iraqis drafting the country's new constitution acknowledged they still had to resolve points as basic as what the country should be called and whether it should have a federal government. Iraqis face a Monday deadline for deciding whether to extend an Aug. 15 deadline for parliamentary approval of a draft constitution.

Americans said they feared postponement would heighten the perception that insurgents, rather than government officials, hold the momentum, and would discourage Iraqis. But outside the Green Zone, Iraqis are already discouraged.

"The Americans' statements are always untrue," said Ali Abed, 50, a taxi driver standing in a 1 1/2 -mile-long line for gas. "We are fed up.

"They destroyed the country, and now they say they want to leave," Abed said. "Let them go to hell, not to their home."


Many Iraqis complain about the continuing hardships here. Because of power outages that the Iraqi government blames on insurgent attacks, electrical power is turned on in Baghdad 30 minutes at a time, four times a day. "Electricity is like medicine in Iraq now," a much-repeated joke on Iraq's al-Sharqiya TV declared this week. "You get it every six hours."

The lack of electricity means no air conditioning, making sleep difficult in the summer heat, when daytime temperatures exceed 120 degrees, said Nouri Muhsen Kadhim, an engineer at an electrical supply store, who added that water shortages forced him to shower only every other day.

U.S. military operations to combat the insurgency mean roadblocks that tie up traffic for hours, Kadhim said. "God save us from the terrorists' attacks too," he said. "Aren't we human beings, with a right to live like others?

"When I was a kid, some teacher told me that we are lucky to live in Iraq, that we have two rivers and we are floating over an ocean of oil," Kadhim added. "I just want to see him now and ask him, 'Where is all that?' "

Bad as it is, comparatively few Iraqis say they want back the days before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that ousted President Saddam Hussein. But the summer of attacks and shortages leaves them short on hope about what will happen when the Americans leave.

"The Americans want to glue together all the parts they broke, to shape it back as a real, new country. But you cannot bring back what you broke as it was before -- everyone will be able to see the break marks," said Jamal Hindawi, 42, at his Baghdad paint shop. "They just want to leave, even if everything will come apart after they go."

Correspondent Andy Mosher and special correspondent Bassam Sebti contributed to this report.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/28/AR2005072802061_pf.html

Because of power outages that the Iraqi government blames on insurgent attacks, electrical power is turned on in Baghdad 30 minutes at a time, four times a day. "Electricity is like medicine in Iraq now," a much-repeated joke on Iraq's al-Sharqiya TV declared this week. "You get it every six hours."

The power outages are a combination of two things, for sure:

One, the failure of US and IA forces to adequately guard power generation facilities;

and

Two, the massive graft and corruption that has been shown to go on in Iraq. We've paid the money, but the work never gets done.

Shameful

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 10:09 am
Cyclo, A thought: we know about the military who served in Iraq and the mental illness associated with it. With all the bombs and gunfire as a routine occurance around the country, I wonder how many Iraqis are suffering from mental illness that are not being treated? So many of them see their children or parents killed. It's a trauma that most cannot cope, and we are responsible.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jul, 2005 10:11 am
A good point, CI. Noone ever talks about the mental casualties of the Iraq war of losing a father or brother or little sister.

And the Republicans wonder where the insurgents come from....

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 05:10:52