0
   

US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 02:09 pm
Neat! I was trying to bypass the bug with the underscores... Who would have figured they would all go through!

I should have tried one more time to make everyone happy. I will try harder next time.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 02:21 pm
"Are you being intentionally obtuse, or just wilfully blind?"

Which does it seem like to you?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 02:50 pm
revel wrote:
Well so far we've been doing a dandy of a job, ain't we? It just seems to me that the Iraq war had the opposite effect of stemming the tide of terrorism rather than helping anything.

I infer from this that you think the growth of "the tide of terrorism" would have been less or the same had we not invaded Iraq. If my inference is correct, please explain why you think that in the light of the following:
Quote:
Quote:
In al Qaeda's 1996 fatwah: http://www.mideastweb.org/osambinladen1.htm [scroll down]
Those youths know that their rewards in fighting you, the USA, is double than their rewards in fighting some one else not from the people of the book. They have no intention except to enter paradise by killing you. An infidel, and enemy of God like you, cannot be in the same hell with his righteous executioner.


Quote:
In al Qaeda's 1998 fatwah:
http://www.mideastweb.org/osambinladen1.htm [scroll down]
~when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said: "I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped", Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.

~to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it.


Quote:
In al Qaeda's 2004 fatwah:
http://www.mail-rchive.com/[email protected]/msg00035.html
Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.


Quote:
The non-partisan 9/11 Commission Report in Chapter 2.5, page 67, note 78.
www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
The Taliban seemed to open the doors to all who wanted to come to Afghanistan to train in the camps. The alliance with the Taliban provided al Qaeda a sanctuary in which to train and indoctrinate fighters and terrorists, import weapons, forge ties with other jihad groups and leaders, and plot and staff terrorist schemes. While Bin Ladin maintained his own al Qaeda guesthouses and camps for vetting and training recruits, he also provided support to and benefited from the broad infrastructure of such facilities in Afghanistan made available to the global network of Islamist movements. U.S. intelligence estimates put the total number of fighters who underwent instruction in Bin Ladin-supported camps in Afghanistan from 1996 through 9/11 at 10,000 to 20,000.78

Quote:
From al Qaeda’s 1996 fatwah:
http://www.mideastweb.org/osambinladen1.htm [scroll down].
Few days ago the news agencies had reported that the Defence Secretary of the Crusading Americans had said that "the explosion at Riyadh and Al-Khobar had taught him one lesson: that is not to withdraw when attacked by coward terrorists".

We say to the Defence Secretary that his talk can induce a grieving mother to laughter! and shows the fears that had enshrined you all. Where was this false courage of yours when the explosion in Beirut took place on 1983 AD (1403 A.H). You were turned into scattered pits and pieces at that time; 241 mainly marines solders were killed. And where was this courage of yours when two explosions made you to leave Aden in less than twenty four hours!

But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia. However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests" of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 04:19 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
"Are you being intentionally obtuse, or just wilfully blind?"

Which does it seem like to you?


I can't decide. Must not know you well enough.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 04:36 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
"Are you being intentionally obtuse, or just wilfully blind?"

Which does it seem like to you?


I can't decide. Must not know you well enough.


I am serious that I think the Islamist threat is being used by others for another agenda. But thats not to say there aren't some very dangerous religious nutters out there. Its just a big game.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 05:55 pm
Ican I think the threat from Iraqi AQ would have been less had we not invaded and lost control of Iraq as there was hardly any AQ of any consequence before we invaded. As far as AQ and other Islamic militants in general being less or more if we had not invaded, I don't think there is any way of knowing for sure. But I do think had we not concentrated all our energy on Iraq we would have had more resources and energy to concentrate on world wide terrorism as a whole. Obsessions are never good and since Bush came in office Iraq has been ours.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 08:06 pm
revel wrote:
Ican I think the threat from Iraqi AQ would have been less had we not invaded and lost control of Iraq as there was hardly any AQ of any consequence before we invaded. As far as AQ and other Islamic militants in general being less or more if we had not invaded, I don't think there is any way of knowing for sure. But I do think had we not concentrated all our energy on Iraq we would have had more resources and energy to concentrate on world wide terrorism as a whole. Obsessions are never good and since Bush came in office Iraq has been ours.

Your opinions are stated well and worthy of debate.

All of the following except that stated guess is supported by my previously posted references.
(1) USA lost control of Iraq soon after we "won the war."
(2) USA must regain control of Iraq before control of Iraq can be successfully transferred to a newly elected government of Iraq capable of retaining its own control of Iraq.
(3) The number of AQ in Iraq at the time of our invasion was large enough (I guess 1,000) to control a dozen mountain villages; in a year and 3 months they grew to that size from I guess about 100 in December 2001.
(4) Terrorist attacks on America, Spain, Britain, and on many others each directly involved less than two dozen terrorists.
(5) AQ had grown from about 100 in Afghanistan in 1996 to an international confederation of terrorists in 1998.
(6) AQ trained 10,000 to 20,000 terrorist fighters from May 19, 1996 until 9/11/2001.
(7) The heart of worldwide terrorism is al Qaeda, which currently is concentrated in Iraq.

So, it's my opinion that the entire USA should first concentrate on exterminating the heart of worldwide terrorism so as not to spread our terrorist fighting resources too thin to be effective, and set aside, or at least postpone, obsessive hatreds of President Bush.

In brief, I think we have to first regain control of Iraq in order to subsequently exterminate worldwide terrorism.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2005 09:32 pm
Ican
Quote:
In brief, I think we have to first regain control of Iraq in order to subsequently exterminate worldwide terrorism.


Regain control? When did we ever have control ... unless you are referring to the carrier landing stunt ... Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 04:12 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
I havent read all of Podhoretz's piece McG but its the ususal neocon story. It doesnt change much. The US is in a global struggle against evil. Evil this time round being comm...no sorry nazism no Islamism.

Yeah thats right the US has to go around the world fighting the Islamists who are determined on world domination. This is no time for the faint hearted, its a noble struggle and will unite America in its determination to .......... continued p94


yawn


Been away for awhile, but I see little has changed ... same apologists apologizing. Yawn, Pt. II.

Okay ... just once for old time's sake ... the U.S. doesn't always have to "go around the world fighting the Islamists." Sometimes they deliver fast & free to our homes ... Kenya, NYC, Spain, Jordan and last summer ... London.

Maybe the telly was off that day?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 04:19 am
You never consider, do you, or you conveniently ignore the fact, that "terrorist" attacks on the west are the RESULT of what the west is doing in the ME, and has been doing for 100 years or more, and not the CAUSE of it.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 04:43 am
WhoodaThunk wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
I havent read all of Podhoretz's piece McG but its the ususal neocon story. It doesnt change much. The US is in a global struggle against evil. Evil this time round being comm...no sorry nazism no Islamism.

Yeah thats right the US has to go around the world fighting the Islamists who are determined on world domination. This is no time for the faint hearted, its a noble struggle and will unite America in its determination to .......... continued p94


yawn


Been away for awhile, but I see little has changed ... same apologists apologizing. Yawn, Pt. II.

Okay ... just once for old time's sake ... the U.S. doesn't always have to "go around the world fighting the Islamists." Sometimes they deliver fast & free to our homes ... Kenya, NYC, Spain, Jordan and last summer ... London.

Maybe the telly was off that day?


No Whooda the tv was on. But the lights went out for a woman who lived not far from me, blown to pieces as she went to work at the Boy Scouts Association. Wasn't it you Whooda who some while back castigated us Europeans for living our cozy comfortable little lives, whilst you yourself live within 50 miles of a nuclear power station? What have you been doing when not on a2k recently, moving away from the front line?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 07:07 am
McTag wrote:
You never consider, do you, or you conveniently ignore the fact, that "terrorist" attacks on the west are the RESULT of what the west is doing in the ME, and has been doing for 100 years or more, and not the CAUSE of it.


What a load of horseshyt. Do you actually believe that?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:04 am
Winning the War in Iraq
Senator John McCain

The past weeks in Iraq have filled our news with numbers. 10 million Iraqis streaming to the polls to determine their future democratically. A new constitution, enshrining fundamental rights, approved across the country by a 4 to 1 margin. Two Sunni-dominated provinces dissenting. Over 2,000 Americans killed in action since the war began.

It's all being counted: the number of safe areas, daily attacks, billions spent per month, days left until the December 15 elections. And yet, as has been so often the case in Iraq, these numbers cannot indicate where that country is heading, because the figures themselves point in different directions. There is, at the same time, both great difficulty and great hope. And just as we'd be unwise to focus solely on the hopeful signs, so too would we be foolish merely to dwell upon the difficulties.

I mention this not because I seek to whitewash the situation in Iraq. On the contrary, not all is well there. But as we look on events there, let us not forget that the Iraqi people are in the midst of something unprecedented in their history.

The world has witnessed Iraqis of all stripes exercising those very democratic habits that critics predicted could never take root in a country with little democratic tradition. They voted in January for an interim government. They put Saddam on trial and dictators throughout the world on notice. They produced a landmark constitution that, while not perfect, nevertheless enshrines critical rights that go far beyond the standards elsewhere in the region. On October 15, they braved explicit death threats from Zarqawi and his ilk in order to determine their future democratically. Try as they might, the terrorists and the insurgents in Iraq got no veto. Instead, an Arab country adopted a democratic constitution by a free vote for the first time in history

Despite the daily bombings and attacks, the terrorists have not achieved their goals. They have failed to incite a civil war, because Kurds and Shia still have faith in the future and in American and Iraqi security efforts. The insurgents have not prevented Iraqis from joining the military and police, in spite of horrific attacks at recruiting centers. Oil exports continue, despite concerted efforts at sabotage. And the insurgents have not stopped the political process, even while they assassinate government officials and attack polling places.

So while I would like to offer thoughts today about events in Iraq, the stakes for the United States, and current American policy, I do so remembering just how far the people there have come. With our help, the dictator who ruled their lives is gone from power, and with our aid the Iraqi people are establishing a true democracy. The Middle East will be forever changed by the choices we have made, and by those we continue to make over the next months. We must get Iraq right.

--continued in link--
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:28 am
Prewar CIA report questioned al Qaeda-Iraq ties

Quote:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A January 2003 CIA report raised doubts about claims that al Qaeda sent operatives to Iraq to acquire chemical and biological weapons -- dramatic assertions that were repeated weeks later by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell to the United Nations in making the case for the invasion of Iraq.

CNN on Thursday obtained a CIA document that outlined the history of the claim, which originated in 2002 with a captured al Qaeda operative who recanted two years later.

The CIA report appears to support a recently declassified document that revealed the Defense Intelligence Agency thought in February 2002 that the source, Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, was lying to interrogators.

Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, this week released the DIA report in alleging the administration cited faulty intelligence to argue for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

In February 2003, al-Libi, a senior military trainer for al Qaeda in Afghanistan, claimed the terrorist network "sent operatives to Iraq" to acquire weapons. His claim was reported in a CIA paper seven months later entitled, "Iraqi Support for Terrorism."

The January 2003 updated version of the report added a key point: "That the detainee was not in a position to know if any training had taken place."

The document obtained by CNN was provided recently to Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who have been pressing for an investigation into the ways in which the Bush administration used intelligence on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the war.

In January and February 2003 President Bush and Powell each made dramatic assertions that Iraq had ties to al Qaeda and argued for military action to prevent Baghdad from providing its suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

In his speech to the U.N. Security Council, Powell did not name al-Libi, but described the U.S. source as a senior terrorist operative.

"My colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources," Powell told the world body.

He said the al Qaeda operative told interrogators that al Qaeda labs in Afghanistan were not capable of manufacturing chemical or biological agents.

"Where did they go? Where did they look? They went to Iraq," Powell said. "None of this should come as a surprise to any of us. Terrorism has been a tool used by Saddam [Hussein] for decades."

No such stockpiles turned up after the U.S.-led invasion, and the independent commission investigating al Qaeda's 2001 attacks on New York and Washington found no evidence of a collaborative relationship between the two entities.

Al-Libi recanted in January 2004 a number of claims he made while in custody, according to the CIA document. His reversal prompted the CIA to order all prior intelligence suggesting Iraq trained al Qaeda personnel in chemical and biological warfare "recalled and re-issued" in February 2004.

A U.S. intelligence official said the information from al-Libi used by the president and Powell in early 2003 was "the best we had at the time" and that the CIA informed policymakers as soon as he recanted his claims.

Another official, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, told reporters Thursday that the intelligence used to support the war had been developed over a "long period of time."

"We all looked at the same intelligence, and most people -- on the intelligence -- reached the same conclusion," Hadley said, referring to the present and previous administrations and to Congress.

A senior administration official said Bush would "directly take on some of these false attacks by some Democratic leaders" during a Veterans Day speech Friday.

CNN's David Ensor contributed to this report


source

This is what I think, if in fact the democrats and other policy makers had the same information but were going around making unqualified statements before the war in order to bolster support for the war simply because it was politically popular to be seen as tough on terrorism and all that, then they are just at fault as the Bush administration in not sharing the doubts that did exist within the intelligence community about the AQ connection and WMD so that the American could have made an informed decision on whether to support the war or not support war. It was the omissions of all the truth which makes the whole bunch guilty of lying in order to get their way.

I think the question now is did the congress have the same information as did the administration? If they did then they are as guilty as the administration. Nevertheless, we have to work with who we have and in order to find out the truth so these investigations are needleful.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:35 am
The whole history of the middle east over the last 100 years, just as McTag says, has been dominated by our interests in oil. In fact its more than an interest, its a dependency, a habit, we are hooked on the stuff.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:37 am
No fair, Steve, that don't count . . . to have such a perspective, one would be obliged to remove one's head from one's posterior and actually pick up books and read them. You demand too much . . .
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:54 am
Yes ... the ME has oil, and the US needs oil. That explains Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. It's the US' fault.

Right?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 09:00 am
No, it's more the fault of England, but we've taken over that dodge, and we've got an idiot in the White House who's taken us down a disasterous road. Of course, he won't pay the price, nor will any of his cronies, nor their children. Other peoples children have to die, and tens of thousands of Iraqis who die just don't count to that too live crew . . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 09:02 am
And while you're pouting and sneering, why not run over to any good library and do the research to find out who trained and equipped bin Laden's boys in Al Qaeda in Afghanistan a generation ago . . .
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 09:07 am
Setanta wrote:
And while you're pouting and sneering, why not run over to any good library and do the research to find out who trained and equipped bin Laden's boys in Al Qaeda in Afghanistan a generation ago . . .


Hmm. Seems to me you're the one doing the pouting ...


But are you saying that because the US trained and equipped bin Laden, the US is responsible for global Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/10/2025 at 10:45:18