US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

DontTreadOnMe wrote:

ican711nm wrote:

Malignancy Advocates Apologists and Defenders (MAAD).

ican711nm wrote:

You and the rest of the MAAD and TOMNOM...

this does not apply to me, so why don't ya drop it. you are behaving like one of the people that decides that if another person is against the war in iraq, they simply must love and adore the jihadists.

get a grip.

When you repeatedly repeat TOMNOM falsities to the effect that the US and Britain are responsible for the murders of Iraqi civilians perpetrated by malignancy, you qualify as a member of MAAD.

"Get a grip," remain opposed to the Iraq war ifyou like, but stop repeating such TOMNOM falsities.

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 30 - A car bomb detonated Friday near a fruit and vegetable market in Hilla, a Shiite town south of Baghdad, killing at least 8 people and wounding 41. It was the second attack in two days of bloodletting that has left 110 people dead.

The bomb, packed into a Mercedes sedan, was remotely detonated at 10:15 a.m. in Al Sharia market in central Hilla, tearing into a crowd of people shopping for food, a police official said. Two of the dead were children younger than 10 and two were women, said Dr. Baha al-Din Eqbal, a doctor at Hilla Hospital.

About 30 minutes after the first explosion, another car bomb detonated outside an American military base in the northern part of the city. There were no reports of casualties and the connection to the first bombing, if any, was unknown.

The first attack was similar to one just 16 hours before in Balad, 50 miles north of Baghdad, where three truck bombs exploded in quick succession, two in a crowded marketplace frequented mostly by Shiites. In that attack the death toll, initially reported as 62, rose sharply overnight and by Friday afternoon had reached 102, including 18 children, according to Dr. Qasim al-Qaisi, the manager of Balad Hospital. In all, 150 people were wounded, he said.

Most of the killing seems to be centered on Shiites, it seems to me this is turning into a not admitted civil war. If we had not invaded, the three sectors would not be killing each other to gain power in Iraq. That is a fact. One can agrue that not invading would have enventually caused more death in the world if Saddam Hussien would have built up his weapons or would have joined up with AQ or other terrorist groups but you can't deny that this invasion set off a chain of killing and death between Iraqis which did not previously take place.

... It boggles the mind how any one person can destroy so many things. .

ican, Your comparisons of Bush to those other tyrants is ironic - to say the least. ROFLMAO
Gotta slot Bush up there in the top ten.

But Bush isn't finished with his destruction....

"Behind whom?" Take your pick. You made the list/

"Ahead of whom?" Take your pick. You made the list.

Why" Because you made the list that makes sense.

Your ad hominems only shows the weakness of your arguments.

McTag wrote:

ican711nm wrote:

McTag wrote:

ican711nm wrote:

DontTreadOnMe wrote:

just wait. the phrase "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" is gonna come up.

This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Here you made that phrase come up all by yourself.

Malignancy Advocates Apologists and Defenders (MAAD), while refusing to acknowledge what they themselves are actually doing, blame others for the horrific crimes committed by malignancy.

I blame the deaths of civilians and innocents in Iraq on the fact that an occupying force has been dropping bombs and firing bullets at them.

You and the rest of the MAAD and TOMNOM not withstanding, the murderers of Iraqi civilians and innocents are the malignancy.

If the malignancy were to stop murdering Iraqi civilians and innocents, the US and British military would be asked by the Iraqi government to leave, and the US and British military would be happy to leave.

So the big new embassy/ administration complex and the military bases were built for nothing, nothing at all, and the US would be happy to leave Iraq and its oilfields if the Iraqi govenment were to ask. And leave all that American money and Iraqi oil behind. I see.

You "see!" Congratulations!

Then we agree!

"The big new embassy/ administration complex and the military bases were built for nothing, nothing at all" is TOMNOM invention, and are MAAD repetitions.

The American embassy in Iraq is a converted Saddam palace.

The American military bases in Iraq are currently housing the more than 100 thousand US troops in Iraq. When the US military vacates Iraq these same bases can be used by the Iraqis own military.

All the US desires regarding Iraqi oil is that it flow unimpeded, sell at prevailing free market prices, and its net revenues flow to the Iraqi people.

All the malignancy has to do to get the Iraqi government to ask the US and British military to leave is to stop murdering Iraqi civilians.

Since nothing, nothing, nothing can justify murdering civilians, those who doubt All the malignancy has to do to get the Iraqi government to ask the US and British military to leave is to stop murdering Iraqi civilians ought to at least be willing to give it a try for a year.

ofcoarse it's senseless - only to you! You develop a list, and don't understand what you wrote. Makes sense to me! LOL

A few nuggets

... Wrong. The bases in Iraq are intended for a premanent American garrison there, with the compliance of a puppet government which would depend on their presence for its survival. From there, military control of the ME can be achieved.

Silly Bunk! Every American embassy in the world has a small marine contingent whose only job is to protect the residents of that embassy. Military control of the ME is not a USA goal.

That was the original plan, which is still being pursued, and which might yet come unstuck if they can't stop fighters and bombers coming in from Iran and Syria.

More Silly Bunk!

This is what they're attempting to do at the moment by the current military operation.

More Silly Bunk!