Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

I don't consider that serious Joe. I think it is a pile of pigshit designed to draw attention away from an inability to answer the question. Piles of pigshit do have that effect.

Sorry--I forgot to say that I do not already know the answer and I am confident that neither does anybody else.

Im trying to figure out whether Flaubert ever built a curragh out of indigenous materials in a barn in pennsylvania, or whether he was subject to the vicissitudes of the psychosomatic realm.

He kept one of Louise's slippers in a desk drawer. If that helps.

And there was a stuffed parrot as well as oriental dressing gowns and blowing smoke rings in the brothel doing doggie with an ugly as a performance for his pals.

Thomas Hardy had a better trick but I'll refrain from going into details because I can't do it myself.

as did Laurlan Hardy

Pig ****. Ahem.
Spendius, your claim to not know the answer to your question is the real pig **** here. Oh, and "no one else does either". (That seems more like horseshit to me, but unlike you, I'm no expert on scatology.)

Do you seriously think that any of us believe you when you say such things? Given all that you have said here regarding your vast studies? Are you telling us now that you do not know how the sciences involved in fossil study work? You do know about such things, right? Otherwise you would not be proffering an honest opinion on the matter. That would be pigshit upon pigshit.

So, let me ask you. What do you know about your question other than your ridiculous claim of ignorance of it's answer?

Joe(Shovel in Hand)Nation

This is the question I was referring to Joe.

I don't know the answer.

Who is the "we" who don't know. It's the pigs shitting in the pigsty and apparently refers to PSXXX's buddies in the pub. He "saw the video" on the NSF's evolution site and that's all that there is to be stated about the intent of the NSF. There's nothing else on the site to encourage people to learn more about evolution, something PSXXX doesn't care to do as he's already made up his mind. Flaubert has all the answers he needs, except the shoe is not in the drawer but up his ass.

We all know and understand that spendi spews **** all the time; it's a wonder he can't smell the stench himself.

Any decisive view on the question boys?

"We" are all those that the hype about the Ardi was intended to influence.

It's a rhetorical "we." No analysis needed.

Was Ardi perhaps influential in the political or business world? Just what is "hyped" influence? He doesn't have the slightest idea but watch him try and fake it.

It was put out that Ardi was the missing link. Which is to say a step to us. It was not mentioned that it might have been being selected out when it carked it and fell into the mud. In which case it would be the opposite to the missing link.

As usual, you are full of it:

Move over, Lucy. And kiss the missing link goodbye.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

What are you reading for your science today -- those right wing blogs that get everything wrong?

I notice effemm hasn't thought fit to offer a definitive judgment.

"Sex for food". I guess they weren't so different from us after all

According to spendi, ardipithecus ramidus created complex civilizations that crumbled into the dirt and were lost for all time. Not just once, but probable multiple times.

That's not what I said. I am merely exposing how you have been led to accept something that isn't necessarily true so that you can make psuedo-scientific conversation in order to aggressively show off your superiority over us poor numbskulls.

So true! "Numbskull" befits you perfectly.

That could be expressed in reverse and be on target:

Why aren't we so different from them in basic instincts -- how slow is evolution? Obviously, painfully slow. While we congratulate ourselves for technological advances, we haven't basically haven't separated ourselves very much from our most primitive ancestors. We have made a technological advance in weaponry so we can more efficiently do away with animals and, unfortunately, ourselves.

Of course, today it's more refined as "the dinner date."
I forgot who recently quipped (might have been Wanda Sykes on Jay Leno) that the sex should come before the dinner date so both parties could determine whether it was worth the price of the restaurant.