wandeljw wrote:UK UPDATE
The Association for Science Education, an organization for UK science teachers has issued the following statement on Intelligent Design:
This should be interesting.
I can name several well known scientific principles that evolution violates.
wandeljw wrote:or explanations to support it.
I'm the first to admit that I can't explain HOW creation was done.
How is that different from when evolutionists say: 'well we may not know HOW evolution happened, but we just KNOW that it did.' ?
wandeljw wrote:Furthermore it is not accepted as a competing scientific theory by the international science community
An appeal to authority, quite nicely done. By this logic, no idea that goes against the status quo can be entertained. Quite a few major scientific advances would be out in the cold on this score.
wandeljw wrote:nor is it part of the science curriculum.
My personal favorite here. Great circular reasoning. 'It should not be part of the curriculum because it's not part of the curriculum.'
wandeljw wrote:It is not science at all.
This is what evolutionists do best. Just say it's not open to discussion.