Sorry to interrupt -I don't know why I got a notification to this post on this thread, but I did, and this is just so blatantly intellectually dishonest (though you say you're being honest):
Quote:If you are not a Christian you are anti-Christian
.
Does this apply to all states of being? Does that mean that in your mind, if you're not Jewish, you are anti-Jew? If you're not Spanish, are you anti-Spanish? If you're not a child, are you anti-child? ...
You have to
be something in order not to be
against it?
I can see how one might say, "If you're not a Christian, you cannot fully understand what it means to be a Christian", and that would apply to all other states of being...especially if you're unwilling to listen and learn what it might mean beyond your outsider's perception about what it may mean, and stubbornly stick with your preconceived and possibly false views of what you
think it means.
But what you've stated here is just as blatantly false.
Quote:It's in the nature of the case.
Just curious
how it's the nature of
what case?