Everything in ID requires that some piece of objective science be ignored or dismissed .
All the arguments (like Irreduciblecomplexity) have been debunked over and over.
Yes, and the ID/Creationist crowd wishes to have these pseudoscience/anti-science beliefs taught is schools without having done the rigorous work of demonstrating principles and subjecting them to peer-review until the principle has been accepted as established.
Thus, when you talk intelligence without relying/using my new discovery of the real intelligence, you are talking a natural phenomenon and not the actual intelligence, thus, you are surely wrong scientifically.
OK, why it is naturen? If we based our Probability Calculation and its limit (0 < P < 1), we can see that any event to occur has always a probability of 1. Which mean, any natural event or natural phenomenon or natural process will always have the ratio of 1. Both reality and probability agreed that all natural event or natural phenomenon or natural processes have always a ratio of 1.
The little racist shows up..
Just saying a lot of crap, as usual.
You leave aside any other possibility, like those who are not Manichean enough to care about the existence of gods.
You are like any other theist or strong atheist, you firmly believe you own the truth.
What a load of bollocks!
Well, you are good but only at showing your stupidity.
Knowledge and reasoning are not your cup of tea.
Maine’s ultra-conservative governor appoints creationist buddy as education commissioner
Why do you post this crap about knowing what other people think?
Why are you so terribly dumb as to persist in posting these inanities?
Your shallowness is impressive..