@FBM,
Quote:Before the scientific revolution of the last four centuries, such arguments were commonplace and widely accepted, presumably because the "gaps" were large and showing no signs of shrinking. A lightning bolt crashes down, the peasants working in the field cross themselves... "
Hawkings theories/pronouncements notwithstanding, the big bang and abiogenesis are the exceptions to the 'gaps' argument. And by that I mean that these gaps show no signs of shrinking. Scientists frequently admit to this for various reasons. For instance, abiogenesis may always remain a mystery because the evidence for it has been lost to time and degeneration of the evidence and we may never be able to look back past the big bang because of the limitations of laws of physics. You can try and deny this by refering to the absurd explainations of Hawking (the universe created itself from nothing) but the fact remains that science does not have a clue about the origin of these things.
This may not always be the case. We may find a way to solve these mysteries in the future but until you have evidence of these 'gaps' closing, you don't have your 'debunking evidence'. Just because Hawking has a plausible theory about why the CBR is the same in all directions is a far cry from that. And saying that science will someday find the answers is no more persuasive to me than me telling you that someday God will reveal what the truth really is.