97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 11:40 am
pssst....."hi"
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 12:10 pm
uh B... B... Buh.... Buh.... B...Buh...Byeh...uhh... BOO
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 12:36 pm
Goodness. It's that pale-skinned Radley boy, and out in the daylight, no less.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 12:38 pm
guys...take a look at this bit from the New Yorker. It is funny.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=60699&start=180
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 12:42 pm
Hi Bernie-

How's it going.You ain't scared of a crew of IDers in some remote backswood is you?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 03:25 pm
hi spendie

No. Just been a bit heartsick lately (women or god are causal, it's uncertain). Thought I'd toss in a few words on the matter from my buddy Noam...

Quote:
President George W. Bush favours teaching both evolution and "Intelligent Design" in schools, "so people can know what the debate is about." To proponents, Intelligent Design is the notion that the universe is too complex to have developed without a nudge from a higher power than evolution or natural selection.

To detractors, Intelligent Design is creationism --the literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis-- in a thin guise, or simply vacuous, about as interesting as "I don't understand," as has always been true in the sciences before understanding is reached. Accordingly, there cannot be a "debate."

In the interest of fairness, perhaps the president's speechwriters should take him seriously when they have him say that schools should be open-minded and teach all points of view. So far, however, the curriculum has not encompassed one obvious point of view: Malignant Design.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 8 Nov, 2005 03:27 pm
ps... I'll see you later over on george's Hofstadter thread. He's got a bit of it wrong but I'm terribly pleased he has that book in his library now.
0 Replies
 
crashlanded vr2
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 12:56 am
Time for a change: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/09/national/09dover.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 03:21 am
All eight of the idiots gone. An appropriate consequence.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 06:43 am
There are many more idiots in the wings.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 07:09 am
And some of them have wings too.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 07:36 am
well, its a good first step. My appreciation for the people of Dover has risen by orders of magnitude.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 07:51 am
farmerman wrote:
well, its a good first step. My appreciation for the people of Dover has risen by orders of magnitude.


Meanwhile the people of Kansas are going the other way. It's chaos I tell ya, cats and dogs living together, fire and brimstone.... end of the world type stuff. Smile
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 07:58 am
Okay Vinkman
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 08:12 am
rosborne,

An important thing to note about Kansas: the new state science standards do not take effect until 2007. Kansas will have an election for new board members in 2006. It is very possible that the new state science policy will be reversed before it goes into effect.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 08:17 am
Thanks for the link, crashlanded! Here is a summary:
Quote:
All eight members of the Pennsylvania school board that introduced intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in biology class were swept out of office.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 08:24 am
Silly me--i thought i might be the first here with the news when i looked into this thread at 7:30 (EST). For whoever announces it, it is good news about the good sense of the voters in Dover.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 08:53 am
According to the brief reports on our news the cause is the usual mid-term blues associated with the national leadership.

And an item on a chat radio programme today said that it was illegal in Pa for a wife to sweep dust under the carpet without informing her husband.They may have said "partner" but it definitely wasn't "furniture" which is the word used in that nightmare SD scenario of Soylent Green for the female who provides domestic services.

When SD sweeps to power no doubt more laughs will be forthcoming.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 08:57 am
Setanta wrote-

Quote:
Silly me


He's noticed himself.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Wed 9 Nov, 2005 09:13 am
spendius wrote:
According to the brief reports on our news the cause is the usual mid-term blues associated with the national leadership.

And an item on a chat radio programme today said that it was illegal in Pa for a wife to sweep dust under the carpet without informing her husband.They may have said "partner" but it definitely wasn't "furniture" which is the word used in that nightmare SD scenario of Soylent Green for the female who provides domestic services.

When SD sweeps to power no doubt more laughs will be forthcoming.


[SARCASM] A powerful argument! [END SARCASM]
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 05/16/2025 at 12:25:28