Its getting hard work to catch up every morning!
Overnight I seem to have missed out on quite a bit, including a dinner invite in Washington (who was paying?). But this is my 2 pence worth for today. First a quote
Quote:from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/international/iraq_judgement.shtml
THE JUDGMENT - Professor Vaughan Lowe
121. My conclusion, therefore, is that under present circumstances it would be contrary to international law for the United Kingdom to engage in military action against Iraq, or assist any other State in taking such action, unless it was expressly authorised to do so by the United Nations Security Council.
122. It follows from this that the United Kingdom would incur responsibility not only if United Kingdom forces themselves engaged in an unauthorised armed attack upon Iraq, but even if the United Kingdom merely provided material assistance to the United States. As Article 16 of the International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility, adopted in 2001, makes clear, States are responsible not only for the wrongs that they themselves do, but also for helping other States to do wrong. Since an unauthorised attack by the United States would be unlawful for the reasons given above, if the United Kingdom were in any way materially to facilitate such an attack it would be internationally responsible for the assistance that it gave.
Perception
"group that consists only of administration bashing". Fine it needs a good bashing
"(anywhere but a French restaurant)" What on earth have you got against French cuisine, I wonder. Vive La France Vive Chirac Vive Dominique de Villepin!
TIMBER
"I am deeply concerned by the prospect of violence arising from this weekend's demonstrations".
Pity you don't seem as concerned about the violence due to kick off the week after.
"Journalists enjoy no special exemption from death if they elect to go in harm's way".
Seems harm's way is filing something the US military doesn't want filed. Journalists are clearly being threatened to conform or risk death.
TW
"Yours are just self-congratulatory, masturbatory fluff".
Hope you feel embarrassed by your comments quoted back.
Kara
"I'll admit there is some enticement there...meeting Steve, who would not nod woodenly when I extemporized".
Well I'm sure that would be a pleasure reciprocated! I might nod, though not woodenly (I've never been known as a wooden nodder). You could interpret it as being in genuine agreement with your pearls of wisdom, or it might be in agreement with the excellent Bordeaux so kindly supplied by Mr and Mrs P. (!)
Or are we reduced to sharing a sandwich on the bus to Washington?
Blatham
"The reputation of the US has been deeply damaged already. If the administration continues on its path without England, England ... England".
Britain please. Or GRANDE BRETAGNE as we are so proud to call ourselves these days. Alternatively The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
There are Scots Welsh and Irishmen (and women) who get quite excited when England is used to mean Britain. (Me? I'm quite relaxed actually, they don't really count, we are just being polite)
Snood
"exhausted by the mental exertion, the wizened sage paused to thoughtfully stroke his long white beard, then turned and started back up the mountain to his mysterious sanctum..."
Brilliant, especially when I first mis read it as scrotum.
hiama
Have you ever known a time like this? UN smashed EU smashed NATO smashed British Government smashed and Prime Minister likely to find himself before the ICC on charges of war crimes?